↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : RNG001-5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:26:17 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   63 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   71 (  38   ~;  33   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   80 (   0 sgn  26   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(product_substitution3,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
      ( product(VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_1)
      | ~ product(VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_0)
      | ~ equalish(VAR_0,VAR_1) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',product_substitution3) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    ( product(C,D,B)
    | ~ product(C,D,A)
    | ~ equalish(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[product_substitution3]) ).

fof(additive_identity1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : sum(additive_identity,VAR_0,VAR_0),
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_identity1) ).

cnf(c_13,plain,
    sum(additive_identity,A,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_identity1]) ).

fof(additive_identity2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : sum(VAR_0,additive_identity,VAR_0),
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_identity2) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    sum(A,additive_identity,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_identity2]) ).

fof(closure_of_multiplication,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : product(VAR_0,VAR_1,multiply(VAR_0,VAR_1)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',closure_of_multiplication) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    product(A,B,multiply(A,B)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[closure_of_multiplication]) ).

fof(right_inverse,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : sum(VAR_0,additive_inverse(VAR_0),additive_identity),
    file('theBenchmark.p',right_inverse) ).

cnf(c_18,plain,
    sum(A,additive_inverse(A),additive_identity),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[right_inverse]) ).

fof(associativity_of_addition1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4,VAR_5] :
      ( sum(VAR_0,VAR_4,VAR_5)
      | ~ sum(VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_5)
      | ~ sum(VAR_1,VAR_3,VAR_4)
      | ~ sum(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_addition1) ).

cnf(c_19,plain,
    ( sum(A,E,F)
    | ~ sum(C,D,F)
    | ~ sum(B,D,E)
    | ~ sum(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[associativity_of_addition1]) ).

fof(distributivity1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4,VAR_5,VAR_6] :
      ( sum(VAR_2,VAR_4,VAR_6)
      | ~ product(VAR_0,VAR_5,VAR_6)
      | ~ sum(VAR_1,VAR_3,VAR_5)
      | ~ product(VAR_0,VAR_3,VAR_4)
      | ~ product(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',distributivity1) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    ( sum(C,E,V6)
    | ~ product(A,F,V6)
    | ~ sum(B,D,F)
    | ~ product(A,D,E)
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[distributivity1]) ).

fof(addition_is_well_defined,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
      ( equalish(VAR_2,VAR_3)
      | ~ sum(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_3)
      | ~ sum(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',addition_is_well_defined) ).

cnf(c_28,plain,
    ( equalish(C,D)
    | ~ sum(A,B,D)
    | ~ sum(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[addition_is_well_defined]) ).

fof(prove_multiplicative_identity_axiom,axiom,
    ~ product(a,additive_identity,additive_identity),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_multiplicative_identity_axiom) ).

cnf(c_30,plain,
    ~ product(a,additive_identity,additive_identity),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_multiplicative_identity_axiom]) ).

cnf(c_277,plain,
    ( sum(multiply(A,D),C,F)
    | ~ product(A,E,F)
    | ~ sum(D,B,E)
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_15]) ).

cnf(c_278,plain,
    ( sum(multiply(D,A),multiply(D,B),E)
    | ~ product(D,C,E)
    | ~ sum(A,B,C) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_277,c_15]) ).

cnf(c_279,plain,
    ( sum(multiply(A,additive_identity),multiply(A,B),C)
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_278,c_13]) ).

cnf(c_109,plain,
    sum(multiply(A,additive_identity),multiply(A,B),multiply(A,B)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_279,c_15]) ).

cnf(c_280,plain,
    ( product(A,B,C)
    | ~ equalish(multiply(A,B),C) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_15]) ).

cnf(c_152,plain,
    ~ equalish(multiply(a,additive_identity),additive_identity),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_280,c_30]) ).

cnf(c_281,plain,
    ( equalish(A,B)
    | ~ sum(A,additive_identity,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_28,c_14]) ).

cnf(c_230,plain,
    ~ sum(multiply(a,additive_identity),additive_identity,additive_identity),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_281,c_152]) ).

cnf(c_282,plain,
    ( sum(A,additive_identity,D)
    | ~ sum(C,additive_inverse(B),D)
    | ~ sum(A,B,C) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_19,c_18]) ).

cnf(c_283,plain,
    ( sum(A,additive_identity,additive_identity)
    | ~ sum(A,B,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_282,c_18]) ).

cnf(c_275,plain,
    ~ sum(multiply(a,additive_identity),A,A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_283,c_230]) ).

cnf(c_276,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_275,c_109]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : RNG001-5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 05:45:21 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.37  % Process 3854630 was started by sandbox2 on n018,
% 0.09/0.37  % Sat Sep 26 05:45:21 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.38  
% 0.09/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.15/0.41  % Length of proof is 14.
% 0.15/0.41  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.15/0.41  % Maximum clause weight is 20.000.
% 0.15/0.41  % Given clauses 35.
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------