%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : RNG006-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:25:11 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 19.18s 5.99s
% Output : Refutation 19.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 25
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 51 ( 23 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 123 ( 4 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 528 ( 74 ~; 72 |; 0 &; 382 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 9 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 15 ( 13 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 160 ( 0 ^; 160 !; 0 ?; 160 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(product_decl,type,
product: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(a_decl,type,
a: $i ).
thf(bS_Ic_decl,type,
bS_Ic: $i ).
thf(aPb_S_IaPc_decl,type,
aPb_S_IaPc: $i ).
thf(sum_decl,type,
sum: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(additive_identity_decl,type,
additive_identity: $i ).
thf(additive_inverse_decl,type,
additive_inverse: $i > $i ).
thf(add_decl,type,
add: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(aPb_decl,type,
aPb: $i ).
thf(aPc_decl,type,
aPc: $i ).
thf(b_decl,type,
b: $i ).
thf(c_decl,type,
c: $i ).
thf(multiply_decl,type,
multiply: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(18,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C @ additive_inverse @ ( B @ additive_inverse @ ( A @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',product_lemma1) ).
thf(56,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C @ additive_inverse @ ( B @ additive_inverse @ ( A @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
thf(20,axiom,
! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( F @ ( E @ ( A @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( F @ ( D @ ( C @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( E @ ( D @ ( B @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_multiplication1) ).
thf(60,plain,
! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( F @ ( E @ ( A @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( F @ ( D @ ( C @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( E @ ( D @ ( B @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[20]) ).
thf(23,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ multiply ) @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',closure_of_multiplication) ).
thf(65,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ multiply ) @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[23]) ).
thf(16,axiom,
! [G: $i,F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( G @ ( F @ ( A @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( G @ ( E @ ( C @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( F @ ( D @ ( B @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( E @ ( D @ ( A @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',distributivity2) ).
thf(53,plain,
! [G: $i,F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( G @ ( F @ ( A @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( G @ ( E @ ( C @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( F @ ( D @ ( B @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( E @ ( D @ ( A @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ ( additive_identity @ sum ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_identity1) ).
thf(41,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ ( additive_identity @ sum ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(12,axiom,
! [G: $i,F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( G @ ( E @ ( C @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( G @ ( F @ ( A @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( F @ ( D @ ( B @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( E @ ( D @ ( A @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',distributivity1) ).
thf(44,plain,
! [G: $i,F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( G @ ( E @ ( C @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( G @ ( F @ ( A @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( F @ ( D @ ( B @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( E @ ( D @ ( A @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(24,axiom,
aPc @ ( c @ ( a @ product ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_times_c) ).
thf(66,plain,
aPc @ ( c @ ( a @ product ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[24]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( F @ ( E @ ( A @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( F @ ( D @ ( C @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( E @ ( D @ ( B @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ sum ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_addition1) ).
thf(35,plain,
! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( F @ ( E @ ( A @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( F @ ( D @ ( C @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( E @ ( D @ ( B @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ sum ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(14,axiom,
! [G: $i,F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( G @ ( B @ ( F @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( G @ ( E @ ( C @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( F @ ( D @ ( A @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( E @ ( B @ ( D @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',distributivity4) ).
thf(48,plain,
! [G: $i,F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( G @ ( B @ ( F @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( G @ ( E @ ( C @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( F @ ( D @ ( A @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( E @ ( B @ ( D @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
thf(19,axiom,
! [G: $i,F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( G @ ( E @ ( C @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( G @ ( B @ ( F @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( F @ ( D @ ( A @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( E @ ( B @ ( D @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',distributivity3) ).
thf(58,plain,
! [G: $i,F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( G @ ( E @ ( C @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( G @ ( B @ ( F @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( F @ ( D @ ( A @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( E @ ( B @ ( D @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C @ ( A @ ( B @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ sum ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_addition) ).
thf(30,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C @ ( A @ ( B @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ sum ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(21,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C @ additive_inverse @ ( B @ ( A @ additive_inverse @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',product_lemma2) ).
thf(62,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C @ additive_inverse @ ( B @ ( A @ additive_inverse @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[21]) ).
thf(11,axiom,
! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( F @ ( D @ ( C @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( F @ ( E @ ( A @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( E @ ( D @ ( B @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_multiplication2) ).
thf(42,plain,
! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( F @ ( D @ ( C @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( F @ ( E @ ( A @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( E @ ( D @ ( B @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
! [A: $i] : ( additive_identity @ ( A @ ( A @ additive_inverse @ sum ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',left_inverse) ).
thf(37,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( additive_identity @ ( A @ ( A @ additive_inverse @ sum ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(13,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C @ ( B @ additive_inverse @ ( A @ additive_inverse @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',product_lemma3) ).
thf(46,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C @ ( B @ additive_inverse @ ( A @ additive_inverse @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i] : ( additive_identity @ ( A @ additive_inverse @ ( A @ sum ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',right_inverse) ).
thf(29,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( additive_identity @ ( A @ additive_inverse @ ( A @ sum ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( F @ ( D @ ( C @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( F @ ( E @ ( A @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( E @ ( D @ ( B @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ sum ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_addition2) ).
thf(33,plain,
! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( F @ ( D @ ( C @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( F @ ( E @ ( A @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( E @ ( D @ ( B @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ sum ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(2,axiom,
! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( additive_identity @ ( A @ sum ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_identity2) ).
thf(28,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( additive_identity @ ( A @ sum ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C = D )
| ~ ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ sum ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',addition_is_well_defined) ).
thf(38,plain,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C = D )
| ~ ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ sum ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ sum ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ add ) @ ( B @ ( A @ sum ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',closure_of_addition) ).
thf(32,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ add ) @ ( B @ ( A @ sum ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(22,axiom,
bS_Ic @ ( c @ additive_inverse @ ( b @ sum ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_plus_inverse_c) ).
thf(64,plain,
bS_Ic @ ( c @ additive_inverse @ ( b @ sum ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[22]) ).
thf(15,axiom,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C = D )
| ~ ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiplication_is_well_defined) ).
thf(50,plain,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C = D )
| ~ ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
thf(25,axiom,
aPb @ ( b @ ( a @ product ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_times_b) ).
thf(67,plain,
aPb @ ( b @ ( a @ product ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[25]) ).
thf(1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( aPb_S_IaPc @ ( bS_Ic @ ( a @ product ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_a_times_bS_Ic_is_aPb_S__IaPc) ).
thf(26,plain,
~ ( aPb_S_IaPc @ ( bS_Ic @ ( a @ product ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
thf(17,axiom,
aPb_S_IaPc @ ( aPc @ additive_inverse @ ( aPb @ sum ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aPb_plus_IaPc) ).
thf(55,plain,
aPb_S_IaPc @ ( aPc @ additive_inverse @ ( aPb @ sum ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).
thf(3398,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[56,60,65,53,41,44,66,35,48,58,30,62,42,37,46,29,33,28,38,32,64,50,67,26,55]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : RNG006-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.14/0.41 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.41 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.41 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.41 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/0.41 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/0.41 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.41 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.41 % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 05:39:18 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.41 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.41 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.90/0.98 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.31/1.18 % [INFO] Parsing done (194ms).
% 1.31/1.19 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 2.00/1.59 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 2.20/1.60 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 2.20/1.69 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 24 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 2.37/1.75 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 24 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 2.37/1.79 % [INFO] Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF).
% 2.59/1.80 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.59/1.81 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 19.18/5.98 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 19.18/5.98 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 19.18/5.99 % Time passed: 5433ms (effective reasoning time: 4787ms)
% 19.18/5.99 % Axioms used in derivation (24): addition_is_well_defined, additive_identity1, associativity_of_multiplication2, distributivity1, closure_of_multiplication, associativity_of_addition2, a_times_b, associativity_of_multiplication1, distributivity4, product_lemma1, closure_of_addition, distributivity3, b_plus_inverse_c, commutativity_of_addition, product_lemma2, additive_identity2, distributivity2, associativity_of_addition1, left_inverse, multiplication_is_well_defined, product_lemma3, aPb_plus_IaPc, right_inverse, a_times_c
% 19.18/5.99 % No. of inferences in proof: 51
% 19.18/5.99 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 5433 ms resp. 4787 ms w/o parsing
% 19.18/6.03 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 19.18/6.03 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------