↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : RNG008-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:05:28 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.26s 0.56s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   65 (  65 unt;   0 nHn;  18 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   65 (  64 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   75 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(multiply_additive_inverse1,axiom,
    multiply(X1,additive_inverse(X2)) = additive_inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/RNG002-0.ax',multiply_additive_inverse1) ).

cnf(boolean_ring,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',boolean_ring) ).

cnf(associative_multiplication,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/RNG002-0.ax',associative_multiplication) ).

cnf(a_times_b_is_c,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,b) = c,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_times_b_is_c) ).

cnf(additive_inverse_additive_inverse,axiom,
    additive_inverse(additive_inverse(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/RNG002-0.ax',additive_inverse_additive_inverse) ).

cnf(multiply_additive_inverse2,axiom,
    multiply(additive_inverse(X1),X2) = additive_inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/RNG002-0.ax',multiply_additive_inverse2) ).

cnf(distribute2,axiom,
    multiply(add(X1,X2),X3) = add(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/RNG002-0.ax',distribute2) ).

cnf(commutative_addition,axiom,
    add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/RNG002-0.ax',commutative_addition) ).

cnf(right_inverse,axiom,
    add(X1,additive_inverse(X1)) = additive_identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',right_inverse) ).

cnf(multiply_additive_id2,axiom,
    multiply(additive_identity,X1) = additive_identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/RNG002-0.ax',multiply_additive_id2) ).

cnf(multiply_additive_id1,axiom,
    multiply(X1,additive_identity) = additive_identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/RNG002-0.ax',multiply_additive_id1) ).

cnf(distribute1,axiom,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/RNG002-0.ax',distribute1) ).

cnf(right_identity,axiom,
    add(X1,additive_identity) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',right_identity) ).

cnf(associative_addition,axiom,
    add(add(X1,X2),X3) = add(X1,add(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/RNG002-0.ax',associative_addition) ).

cnf(left_identity,axiom,
    add(additive_identity,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/RNG002-0.ax',left_identity) ).

cnf(prove_commutativity,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(b,a) != c,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_commutativity) ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    multiply(X1,additive_inverse(X2)) = additive_inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),
    multiply_additive_inverse1 ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,X1) = X1,
    boolean_ring ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    associative_multiplication ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,b) = c,
    a_times_b_is_c ).

cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,additive_inverse(X1)) = additive_inverse(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    additive_inverse(additive_inverse(X1)) = X1,
    additive_inverse_additive_inverse ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    multiply(additive_inverse(X1),X2) = additive_inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),
    multiply_additive_inverse2 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,multiply(b,X1)) = multiply(c,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
    multiply(additive_inverse(X1),X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    multiply(additive_inverse(X1),X2) = multiply(X1,additive_inverse(X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
    multiply(add(X1,X2),X3) = add(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(X2,X3)),
    distribute2 ).

cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
    multiply(c,b) = c,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_17]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
    add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
    commutative_addition ).

cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
    add(X1,additive_inverse(X1)) = additive_identity,
    right_inverse ).

cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
    additive_inverse(X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,hypothesis,
    add(c,multiply(X1,b)) = multiply(add(X1,c),b),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    add(X1,X1) = additive_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(add(a,c),b) = additive_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_19]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,axiom,
    multiply(additive_identity,X1) = additive_identity,
    multiply_additive_id2 ).

cnf(c_0_35,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(X1,X2))) = multiply(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(add(a,c),multiply(b,X1)) = additive_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_33]),c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,axiom,
    multiply(X1,additive_identity) = additive_identity,
    multiply_additive_id1 ).

cnf(c_0_38,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X1,X2)) = multiply(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,axiom,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    distribute1 ).

cnf(c_0_40,hypothesis,
    multiply(c,multiply(b,X1)) = multiply(c,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,hypothesis,
    multiply(b,add(a,c)) = additive_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,c) = c,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,hypothesis,
    add(X1,multiply(X1,X2)) = multiply(X1,add(X2,X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_17]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,hypothesis,
    multiply(c,add(a,c)) = additive_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,axiom,
    add(X1,additive_identity) = X1,
    right_identity ).

cnf(c_0_46,axiom,
    add(add(X1,X2),X3) = add(X1,add(X2,X3)),
    associative_addition ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    add(c,multiply(a,X1)) = multiply(a,add(X1,c)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_42]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,hypothesis,
    multiply(c,a) = c,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),c_0_45]),c_0_46]),c_0_32]),c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,hypothesis,
    multiply(a,add(a,c)) = add(a,c),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_17]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,add(X1,c)) = multiply(a,add(X1,b)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_19]),c_0_28]),c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,hypothesis,
    multiply(c,multiply(a,X1)) = multiply(c,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,hypothesis,
    multiply(a,add(a,b)) = add(a,c),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,hypothesis,
    multiply(c,add(a,b)) = additive_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]),c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,axiom,
    add(additive_identity,X1) = X1,
    left_identity ).

cnf(c_0_55,hypothesis,
    multiply(c,multiply(add(a,b),X1)) = additive_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_53]),c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    add(X1,add(X1,X2)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_32]),c_0_54]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(b,multiply(c,a)) = multiply(b,a),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(b,a) != c,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
    add(c,multiply(X1,c)) = multiply(add(X1,a),c),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_42]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,hypothesis,
    multiply(add(a,b),c) = additive_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_55]),c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    add(X1,add(X2,X1)) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(b,c) = multiply(b,a),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(b,a) != c,
    c_0_58 ).

cnf(c_0_64,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_60]),c_0_45]),c_0_46]),c_0_61]),c_0_62]),c_0_63]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : RNG008-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.42  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.42  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.43  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 04:12:28 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.43  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.50  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/0.56  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.26/0.56  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.56  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.56  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.56  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.56  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.56  % new_bool_1 with pid 941428 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.56  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.26/0.56  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.56  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.56  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.56  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.56  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.26/0.56  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.26/0.56  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.56  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.56  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.56  % SubtermCWHack with pid 941434 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.56  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.26/0.56  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.56  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.56  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.56  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.56  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.26/0.56  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.26/0.56  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.56  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.56  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.56  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.26/0.56  
% 0.26/0.56  % Proof found!
% 0.26/0.56  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.26/0.56  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.56  % Parsed axioms                        : 19
% 0.26/0.56  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.26/0.56  % Initial clauses                      : 19
% 0.26/0.56  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.26/0.56  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 19
% 0.26/0.56  % Processed clauses                    : 168
% 0.26/0.56  % ...of these trivial                  : 23
% 0.26/0.56  % ...subsumed                          : 58
% 0.26/0.56  % ...remaining for further processing  : 87
% 0.26/0.56  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.26/0.56  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.26/0.56  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.26/0.56  % Backward-rewritten                   : 18
% 0.26/0.56  % Generated clauses                    : 1790
% 0.26/0.56  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1061
% 0.26/0.56  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.26/0.56  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.26/0.56  % Paramodulations                      : 1790
% 0.26/0.56  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.26/0.56  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.26/0.56  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.26/0.56  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.26/0.56  % Total rewrite steps                  : 2441
% 0.26/0.56  % ...of those cached                   : 1743
% 0.26/0.56  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.26/0.56  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.26/0.56  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/0.56  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.26/0.56  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/0.56  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.26/0.56  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.26/0.56  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.26/0.56  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.26/0.56  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.26/0.56  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.26/0.56  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.26/0.56  % Current number of processed clauses  : 69
% 0.26/0.56  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 62
% 0.26/0.56  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 6
% 0.26/0.56  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.26/0.56  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.26/0.56  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 891
% 0.26/0.56  % ...number of literals in the above   : 891
% 0.26/0.56  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.26/0.56  % Current number of archived clauses   : 18
% 0.26/0.56  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.26/0.56  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/0.56  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.26/0.56  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
% 0.26/0.56  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.26/0.56  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 90
% 0.26/0.56  % BW rewrite match successes           : 61
% 0.26/0.56  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.26/0.56  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.26/0.56  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 17322
% 0.26/0.56  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.26/0.56  
% 0.26/0.56  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.56  % User time                : 0.027 s
% 0.26/0.56  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.26/0.56  % Total time               : 0.034 s
% 0.26/0.56  % Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 0.26/0.56  
% 0.26/0.56  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.56  % User time                : 0.028 s
% 0.26/0.56  % System time              : 0.014 s
% 0.26/0.56  % Total time               : 0.042 s
% 0.26/0.56  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.26/0.56  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------