↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : RNG015-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:26:21 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 10.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  33 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   33 (  32 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    4 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   53 (   1 sgn  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(left_additive_identity,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : add(additive_identity,VAR_0) = VAR_0,
    file('theBenchmark.p',left_additive_identity) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    add(additive_identity,A) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[left_additive_identity]) ).

fof(right_multiplicative_zero,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : multiply(VAR_0,additive_identity) = additive_identity,
    file('theBenchmark.p',right_multiplicative_zero) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    multiply(A,additive_identity) = additive_identity,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[right_multiplicative_zero]) ).

fof(right_additive_inverse,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : add(VAR_0,additive_inverse(VAR_0)) = additive_identity,
    file('theBenchmark.p',right_additive_inverse) ).

cnf(c_6,plain,
    add(A,additive_inverse(A)) = additive_identity,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[right_additive_inverse]) ).

fof(additive_inverse_additive_inverse,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : additive_inverse(additive_inverse(VAR_0)) = VAR_0,
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_inverse_additive_inverse) ).

cnf(c_7,plain,
    additive_inverse(additive_inverse(A)) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_inverse_additive_inverse]) ).

fof(distribute1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] : multiply(VAR_0,add(VAR_1,VAR_2)) = add(multiply(VAR_0,VAR_1),multiply(VAR_0,VAR_2)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',distribute1) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    multiply(A,add(B,C)) = add(multiply(A,B),multiply(A,C)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[distribute1]) ).

fof(commutativity_for_addition,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : add(VAR_0,VAR_1) = add(VAR_1,VAR_0),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_for_addition) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    add(A,B) = add(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_for_addition]) ).

fof(associativity_for_addition,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] : add(VAR_0,add(VAR_1,VAR_2)) = add(add(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_2),
    file('theBenchmark.p',associativity_for_addition) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    add(A,add(B,C)) = add(add(A,B),C),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[associativity_for_addition]) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    add(add(A,B),C) = add(A,add(B,C)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_11]) ).

fof(prove_distributivity,axiom,
    multiply(x,add(y,additive_inverse(z))) != add(multiply(x,y),additive_inverse(multiply(x,z))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_distributivity) ).

cnf(c_18,plain,
    multiply(x,add(y,additive_inverse(z))) != add(multiply(x,y),additive_inverse(multiply(x,z))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_distributivity]) ).

cnf(c_19,plain,
    add(multiply(x,y),multiply(x,additive_inverse(z))) != add(multiply(x,y),additive_inverse(multiply(x,z))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_18]) ).

cnf(c_75,plain,
    multiply(A,additive_identity) = add(multiply(A,B),multiply(A,additive_inverse(B))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_76,plain,
    additive_identity = add(multiply(A,B),multiply(A,additive_inverse(B))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_75]) ).

cnf(c_21,plain,
    add(multiply(A,B),multiply(A,additive_inverse(B))) = additive_identity,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_76]) ).

cnf(c_77,plain,
    add(additive_identity,A) = add(B,add(additive_inverse(B),A)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_12]) ).

cnf(c_78,plain,
    A = add(B,add(additive_inverse(B),A)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_77]) ).

cnf(c_25,plain,
    add(A,add(additive_inverse(A),B)) = B,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_78]) ).

cnf(c_36,plain,
    add(A,add(B,additive_inverse(A))) = B,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_25]) ).

cnf(c_38,plain,
    add(additive_inverse(A),add(B,A)) = B,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_7,c_36]) ).

cnf(c_79,plain,
    add(additive_inverse(multiply(A,additive_inverse(B))),additive_identity) = multiply(A,B),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_21,c_38]) ).

cnf(c_80,plain,
    add(additive_identity,additive_inverse(multiply(A,additive_inverse(B)))) = multiply(A,B),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_79]) ).

cnf(c_64,plain,
    additive_inverse(multiply(A,additive_inverse(B))) = multiply(A,B),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_80]) ).

cnf(c_81,plain,
    additive_inverse(multiply(A,B)) = multiply(A,additive_inverse(B)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_7]) ).

cnf(c_72,plain,
    multiply(A,additive_inverse(B)) = additive_inverse(multiply(A,B)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_81]) ).

cnf(c_82,plain,
    add(multiply(x,y),additive_inverse(multiply(x,z))) != add(multiply(x,y),additive_inverse(multiply(x,z))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_72,c_19]) ).

cnf(c_74,plain,
    $false,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_82]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : RNG015-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/10.37  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/10.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/10.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/10.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/10.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/10.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/10.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/10.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 05:47:09 UTC 2026
% 0.10/10.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/10.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/10.37  % Process 2906675 was started by sandbox on n008,
% 0.10/10.37  % Sat Sep 26 05:47:09 2026
% 0.10/10.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.10/10.38  
% 0.10/10.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.13/10.40  
% 0.13/10.40  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.13/10.40  
% 0.13/10.40  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.13/10.40  % Length of proof is 17.
% 0.13/10.40  % Level of proof is 7.
% 0.13/10.40  % Maximum clause weight is 17.000.
% 0.13/10.40  % Given clauses 23.
% 0.13/10.40  
% 0.13/10.40  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------