↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : RNG037-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:26:28 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   36 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   35 (  19   ~;  16   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   31 (   1 sgn  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(additive_inverse2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : sum(VAR_0,additive_inverse(VAR_0),additive_identity),
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_inverse2) ).

cnf(c_13,plain,
    sum(A,additive_inverse(A),additive_identity),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_inverse2]) ).

fof(commutativity_of_addition,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
      ( sum(VAR_1,VAR_0,VAR_2)
      | ~ sum(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_addition) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    ( sum(B,A,C)
    | ~ sum(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_addition]) ).

fof(distributivity1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4,VAR_5,VAR_6] :
      ( sum(VAR_2,VAR_4,VAR_6)
      | ~ product(VAR_0,VAR_5,VAR_6)
      | ~ sum(VAR_1,VAR_3,VAR_5)
      | ~ product(VAR_0,VAR_3,VAR_4)
      | ~ product(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',distributivity1) ).

cnf(c_19,plain,
    ( sum(C,E,V6)
    | ~ product(A,F,V6)
    | ~ sum(B,D,F)
    | ~ product(A,D,E)
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[distributivity1]) ).

fof(multiplicative_identity2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : product(VAR_0,additive_identity,additive_identity),
    file('theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_identity2) ).

cnf(c_26,plain,
    product(A,additive_identity,additive_identity),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_identity2]) ).

fof(a_times_b,axiom,
    product(a,b,d),
    file('theBenchmark.p',a_times_b) ).

cnf(c_27,plain,
    product(a,b,d),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[a_times_b]) ).

fof(a_inverse_times_b,axiom,
    product(a,additive_inverse(b),c),
    file('theBenchmark.p',a_inverse_times_b) ).

cnf(c_28,plain,
    product(a,additive_inverse(b),c),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[a_inverse_times_b]) ).

fof(prove_sum_is_additive_identity,axiom,
    ~ sum(c,d,additive_identity),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_sum_is_additive_identity) ).

cnf(c_29,plain,
    ~ sum(c,d,additive_identity),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_sum_is_additive_identity]) ).

cnf(c_280,plain,
    ( sum(d,B,D)
    | ~ product(a,C,D)
    | ~ sum(b,A,C)
    | ~ product(a,A,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_19,c_27]) ).

cnf(c_281,plain,
    ( sum(d,c,B)
    | ~ product(a,A,B)
    | ~ sum(b,additive_inverse(b),A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_280,c_28]) ).

cnf(c_282,plain,
    ( sum(d,c,A)
    | ~ product(a,additive_identity,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_281,c_13]) ).

cnf(c_255,plain,
    sum(d,c,additive_identity),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_282,c_26]) ).

cnf(c_278,plain,
    ~ sum(d,c,additive_identity),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_29,c_16]) ).

cnf(c_279,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_278,c_255]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : RNG037-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.39  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.39  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 05:51:00 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.39  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.12/0.39  % Process 3931543 was started by sandbox2 on n011,
% 0.12/0.39  % Sat Sep 26 05:51:00 2026
% 0.12/0.39  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.12/0.44  
% 0.12/0.44  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.44  
% 0.12/0.44  % Proof 1 at 0.03 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.12/0.44  % Length of proof is 10.
% 0.12/0.44  % Level of proof is 2.
% 0.12/0.44  % Maximum clause weight is 20.000.
% 0.12/0.44  % Given clauses 29.
% 0.12/0.44  
% 0.12/0.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------