↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : RNG038-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:40:38 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.40s 0.58s
% Output   : Refutation 0.40s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   21 (   3 equ;  14 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(additive_identity1,axiom,
    sum(additive_identity,X,X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/RNG001-0.ax',additive_identity1) ).

cnf(left_inverse,axiom,
    sum(additive_inverse(X),X,additive_identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/RNG001-0.ax',left_inverse) ).

cnf(associativity_of_addition1,axiom,
    ( ~ sum(X,Y,Z)
    | ~ sum(Y,U,V)
    | ~ sum(Z,U,W)
    | sum(X,V,W) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/RNG001-0.ax',associativity_of_addition1) ).

cnf(distributivity3,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X,Y,Z)
    | ~ product(U,Y,V)
    | ~ sum(X,U,W)
    | ~ product(W,Y,X1)
    | sum(Z,V,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/RNG001-0.ax',distributivity3) ).

cnf(addition_is_well_defined,axiom,
    ( ~ sum(X,Y,Z)
    | ~ sum(X,Y,U)
    | Z = U ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/RNG001-0.ax',addition_is_well_defined) ).

cnf(some_property,hypothesis,
    ( X != additive_identity
    | product(X,h(X,Y),Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',some_property) ).

cnf(prove_b_is_additive_identity,negated_conjecture,
    b != additive_identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_b_is_additive_identity) ).

cnf(20,plain,
    ~ sum(additive_identity,b,additive_identity),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[addition_is_well_defined,additive_identity1,prove_b_is_additive_identity]) ).

cnf(74,plain,
    ~ sum(b,X,X),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[associativity_of_addition1,20,left_inverse,left_inverse]) ).

cnf(87,plain,
    ~ product(additive_identity,X,b),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[distributivity3,74,additive_identity1]) ).

cnf(119,plain,
    $false,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[some_property,87,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : RNG038-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Mon May 30 08:37:27 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.47  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.49  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.49   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.49   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.49   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.49   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  "."
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-30T08:37:27
% 0.21/0.49  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n018.cluster.edu at 2022-05-30T08:37:27
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  ; Recognized possible left identity assertion (|sum| |additive_identity| ?X ?X).
% 0.21/0.51  ; Recognized possible right identity assertion (|sum| ?X |additive_identity| ?X).
% 0.21/0.51  ; Recognized relation function assertion (|product| ?X ?Y (|multiply| ?X ?Y)).
% 0.21/0.51  ; Recognized relation function assertion (|sum| ?X ?Y (|add| ?X ?Y)).
% 0.21/0.51  ; Recognized possible left inverse assertion (|sum| (|additive_inverse| ?X) ?X |additive_identity|).
% 0.21/0.51  ; Recognized possible right inverse assertion (|sum| ?X (|additive_inverse| ?X) |additive_identity|).
% 0.21/0.51  ; Recognized possible associativity assertion (OR (NOT (|sum| ?X ?Y ?Z)) (NOT (|sum| ?Y ?U ?V)) (NOT (|sum| ?Z ?U ?W)) (|sum| ?X ?V ?W)).
% 0.21/0.51  ; Recognized possible associativity assertion (OR (NOT (|sum| ?X ?Y ?Z)) (NOT (|sum| ?Y ?U ?V)) (NOT (|sum| ?X ?V ?W)) (|sum| ?Z ?U ?W)).
% 0.21/0.51  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (OR (NOT (|sum| ?X ?Y ?Z)) (|sum| ?Y ?X ?Z)).
% 0.21/0.51  ; Recognized possible associativity assertion (OR (NOT (|product| ?X ?Y ?Z)) (NOT (|product| ?Y ?U ?V)) (NOT (|product| ?Z ?U ?W)) (|product| ?X ?V ?W)).
% 0.21/0.51  ; Recognized possible associativity assertion (OR (NOT (|product| ?X ?Y ?Z)) (NOT (|product| ?Y ?U ?V)) (NOT (|product| ?X ?V ?W)) (|product| ?Z ?U ?W)).
% 0.21/0.51  ; Recognized relation functionality assertion (OR (NOT (|sum| ?X ?Y ?Z)) (NOT (|sum| ?X ?Y ?U)) (= ?Z ?U)).
% 0.21/0.51  ; Recognized relation functionality assertion (OR (NOT (|product| ?X ?Y ?Z)) (NOT (|product| ?X ?Y ?U)) (= ?Z ?U)).
% 0.21/0.51  ; Declaring sum to be commutative.
% 0.21/0.51  ; Declaring add to be commutative.
% 0.40/0.58  ; Declaring add to be associative-commutative.
% 0.40/0.58  
% 0.40/0.58  #||
% 0.40/0.58  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/0.58  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.40/0.58  ||#
% 0.40/0.58  
% 0.40/0.58  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.40/0.58  ;      1164 formulas have been input or derived (from 32 formulas).
% 0.40/0.58  ;       119 (10%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.40/0.58  ;            8 ( 7%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.40/0.58  ;          111 (93%) are still being kept.
% 0.40/0.58  ; 
% 0.40/0.58  ; Run time in seconds:
% 0.40/0.58  ;     0.005   5%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.40/0.58  ;     0.001   1%   Assert                       (21 calls)
% 0.40/0.58  ;     0.011  12%   Process new row              (810 calls)
% 0.40/0.58  ;     0.036  38%   Resolution                   (62 calls)
% 0.40/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Paramodulation               (31 calls)
% 0.40/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Embedding                    (2 calls)
% 0.40/0.58  ;     0.002   2%   Condensing                   (11 calls)
% 0.40/0.58  ;     0.001   1%   Forward subsumption          (11 calls)
% 0.40/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (10 calls)
% 0.40/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (7 calls)
% 0.40/0.58  ;     0.012  13%   Forward simplification       (749 calls)
% 0.40/0.58  ;     0.001   1%   Backward simplification      (118 calls)
% 0.40/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering                     (22 calls)
% 0.40/0.58  ;     0.001   1%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.40/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.40/0.58  ;     0.024  26%   Other
% 0.40/0.58  ;     0.094        Total
% 0.40/0.58  ;     0.095        Real time
% 0.40/0.58  ; 
% 0.40/0.58  ; Term-hash-array has 197 terms in all.
% 0.40/0.58  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 10 entries (10 at peak, 10 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.40/0.59  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 17 nodes (17 at peak, 17 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.40/0.59  ;  Retrieved 4 possibly forward subsuming rows in 11 calls.
% 0.40/0.59  ;  Retrieved 3 possibly backward subsumed rows in 10 calls.
% 0.40/0.59  ; Path-index has 192 entries (192 at peak, 200 added, 8 deleted).
% 0.40/0.59  ; Path-index has 245 nodes (245 at peak, 245 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.40/0.59  ; Trie-index has 192 entries (192 at peak, 200 added, 8 deleted).
% 0.40/0.59  ; Trie-index has 351 nodes (351 at peak, 359 added, 8 deleted).
% 0.40/0.59  ; Retrieved 1,906 generalization terms in 1,802 calls.
% 0.40/0.59  ; Retrieved 121 instance terms in 107 calls.
% 0.40/0.59  ; Retrieved 19,511 unifiable terms in 2,393 calls.
% 0.40/0.59  ; 
% 0.40/0.59  ; The agenda of rows to process has 11 entries:
% 0.40/0.59  ;     1 with value 8               3 with value 12               2 with value 16
% 0.40/0.59  ;     1 with value 11              4 with value 14
% 0.40/0.59  ; The agenda of rows to give has 81 entries:
% 0.40/0.59  ;     3 with value (4 8)          11 with value (4 11)           7 with value (4 14)
% 0.40/0.59  ;     7 with value (4 9)          12 with value (4 12)           4 with value (4 15)
% 0.40/0.59  ;    17 with value (4 10)         14 with value (4 13)           6 with value (4 16)
% 0.40/0.59  Evaluation took:
% 0.40/0.59    0.095 seconds of real time
% 0.40/0.59    0.085093 seconds of user run time
% 0.40/0.59    0.010044 seconds of system run time
% 0.40/0.59    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.40/0.59    0 page faults and
% 0.40/0.59    5,032,168 bytes consed.
% 0.40/0.59  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.40/0.59  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-30T08:37:27
% 0.40/0.59  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.40/0.59  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------