↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : RNG040-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:25:19 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 41.54s 11.58s
% Output   : Refutation 41.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   25
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   51 (  27 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  107 (   8 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  420 (  54   ~;  56   |;   0   &; 310   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   8 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   16 (  14 usr;   9 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  128 (   0   ^; 128   !;   0   ?; 128   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sum_decl,type,
    sum: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(b_decl,type,
    b: $i ).

thf(c_decl,type,
    c: $i ).

thf(d_decl,type,
    d: $i ).

thf(product_decl,type,
    product: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(a_decl,type,
    a: $i ).

thf(additive_identity_decl,type,
    additive_identity: $i ).

thf(l_decl,type,
    l: $i ).

thf(n_decl,type,
    n: $i ).

thf(multiply_decl,type,
    multiply: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(multiplicative_identity_decl,type,
    multiplicative_identity: $i ).

thf(add_decl,type,
    add: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(additive_inverse_decl,type,
    additive_inverse: $i > $i ).

thf(h_decl,type,
    h: $i > $i ).

thf(19,axiom,
    ! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( F @ ( E @ ( A @ sum ) ) )
      | ~ ( F @ ( D @ ( C @ sum ) ) )
      | ~ ( E @ ( D @ ( B @ sum ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ sum ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_addition1) ).

thf(56,plain,
    ! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( F @ ( E @ ( A @ sum ) ) )
      | ~ ( F @ ( D @ ( C @ sum ) ) )
      | ~ ( E @ ( D @ ( B @ sum ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ sum ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C = D )
      | ~ ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiplication_is_well_defined) ).

thf(42,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C = D )
      | ~ ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(22,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A = additive_identity )
      | ( multiplicative_identity @ ( A @ h @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause30) ).

thf(60,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A = additive_identity )
      | ( multiplicative_identity @ ( A @ h @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[22]) ).

thf(17,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ add ) @ ( B @ ( A @ sum ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',closure_of_addition) ).

thf(53,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ add ) @ ( B @ ( A @ sum ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ multiply ) @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',closure_of_multiplication) ).

thf(41,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ multiply ) @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(24,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( multiplicative_identity @ ( A @ product ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',right_multiplicative_identity) ).

thf(66,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( multiplicative_identity @ ( A @ product ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[24]) ).

thf(23,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A = additive_identity )
      | ( multiplicative_identity @ ( A @ ( A @ h @ product ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause31) ).

thf(63,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A = additive_identity )
      | ( multiplicative_identity @ ( A @ ( A @ h @ product ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[23]) ).

thf(25,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ ( additive_identity @ sum ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_identity1) ).

thf(67,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ ( additive_identity @ sum ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[25]) ).

thf(5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( additive_identity @ ( n @ ( l @ sum ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_equation) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ~ ( additive_identity @ ( n @ ( l @ sum ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(20,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( additive_identity @ ( A @ additive_inverse @ ( A @ sum ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_inverse2) ).

thf(58,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( additive_identity @ ( A @ additive_inverse @ ( A @ sum ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[20]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( A @ ( B @ product ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',product_symmetry) ).

thf(47,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( A @ ( B @ product ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( additive_identity @ ( A @ sum ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_identity2) ).

thf(46,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( additive_identity @ ( A @ sum ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(3,negated_conjecture,
    l @ ( a @ ( b @ product ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_plus_a) ).

thf(29,plain,
    l @ ( a @ ( b @ product ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    additive_identity @ ( a @ ( d @ product ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d_plus_a) ).

thf(28,plain,
    additive_identity @ ( a @ ( d @ product ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C = D )
      | ~ ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ sum ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ sum ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',addition_is_well_defined) ).

thf(38,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C = D )
      | ~ ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ sum ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ sum ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ ( multiplicative_identity @ product ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',left_multiplicative_identity) ).

thf(45,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ ( multiplicative_identity @ product ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( F @ ( D @ ( C @ product ) ) )
      | ~ ( F @ ( E @ ( A @ product ) ) )
      | ~ ( E @ ( D @ ( B @ product ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_multiplication2) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( F @ ( D @ ( C @ product ) ) )
      | ~ ( F @ ( E @ ( A @ product ) ) )
      | ~ ( E @ ( D @ ( B @ product ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [G: $i,F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( G @ ( E @ ( C @ sum ) ) )
      | ~ ( G @ ( F @ ( A @ product ) ) )
      | ~ ( F @ ( D @ ( B @ sum ) ) )
      | ~ ( E @ ( D @ ( A @ product ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',distributivity1) ).

thf(34,plain,
    ! [G: $i,F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( G @ ( E @ ( C @ sum ) ) )
      | ~ ( G @ ( F @ ( A @ product ) ) )
      | ~ ( F @ ( D @ ( B @ sum ) ) )
      | ~ ( E @ ( D @ ( A @ product ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(21,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( additive_identity @ ( A @ ( A @ additive_inverse @ sum ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_inverse1) ).

thf(59,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( additive_identity @ ( A @ ( A @ additive_inverse @ sum ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[21]) ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    d @ ( c @ ( b @ sum ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_plus_c) ).

thf(27,plain,
    d @ ( c @ ( b @ sum ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(18,axiom,
    ! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( F @ ( E @ ( A @ product ) ) )
      | ~ ( F @ ( D @ ( C @ product ) ) )
      | ~ ( E @ ( D @ ( B @ product ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_multiplication1) ).

thf(54,plain,
    ! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( F @ ( E @ ( A @ product ) ) )
      | ~ ( F @ ( D @ ( C @ product ) ) )
      | ~ ( E @ ( D @ ( B @ product ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(15,axiom,
    ! [G: $i,F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( G @ ( F @ ( A @ product ) ) )
      | ~ ( G @ ( E @ ( C @ sum ) ) )
      | ~ ( F @ ( D @ ( B @ sum ) ) )
      | ~ ( E @ ( D @ ( A @ product ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',distributivity2) ).

thf(49,plain,
    ! [G: $i,F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( G @ ( F @ ( A @ product ) ) )
      | ~ ( G @ ( E @ ( C @ sum ) ) )
      | ~ ( F @ ( D @ ( B @ sum ) ) )
      | ~ ( E @ ( D @ ( A @ product ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ product ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( F @ ( D @ ( C @ sum ) ) )
      | ~ ( F @ ( E @ ( A @ sum ) ) )
      | ~ ( E @ ( D @ ( B @ sum ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ sum ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_addition2) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( F @ ( D @ ( C @ sum ) ) )
      | ~ ( F @ ( E @ ( A @ sum ) ) )
      | ~ ( E @ ( D @ ( B @ sum ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ sum ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(4,negated_conjecture,
    n @ ( a @ ( c @ product ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_plus_a) ).

thf(30,plain,
    n @ ( a @ ( c @ product ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( A @ ( B @ sum ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ sum ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_addition) ).

thf(51,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( A @ ( B @ sum ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ sum ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(7414,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[56,42,60,53,41,66,63,67,26,58,47,46,29,28,38,45,32,34,59,27,54,49,36,30,51]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : RNG040-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/0.39  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.39  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 05:54:10 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.40  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.86/0.99  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.21/1.18  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (189ms). 
% 1.21/1.20  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.02/1.60  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.02/1.61  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.21/1.71  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 20 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.21/1.77  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 20 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.40/1.81  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 2.40/1.81  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.40/1.82  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 41.54/11.57  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 41.54/11.57  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 41.54/11.57  % Time passed: 11031ms (effective reasoning time: 10371ms)
% 41.54/11.58  % Axioms used in derivation (20): addition_is_well_defined, closure_of_addition, commutativity_of_addition, additive_identity2, multiplication_is_well_defined, associativity_of_addition2, associativity_of_multiplication1, clause31, additive_inverse2, distributivity2, associativity_of_addition1, right_multiplicative_identity, additive_identity1, left_multiplicative_identity, associativity_of_multiplication2, additive_inverse1, distributivity1, product_symmetry, closure_of_multiplication, clause30
% 41.54/11.58  % No. of inferences in proof: 51
% 41.54/11.58  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 11031 ms resp. 10371 ms w/o parsing
% 41.20/11.62  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 41.20/11.62  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------