↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : RNG055+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:05:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   88 (  25 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  111 (  54   ~;  42   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;  10 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   31 (  13 sgn  10   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
    sdtasdt0(xP,xP) = sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xH,xH),sdtasdt0(xE,xE)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

fof(mArith,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( aScalar0(X3)
        & aScalar0(X2)
        & aScalar0(X1) )
     => ( sdtasdt0(X1,X2) = sdtasdt0(X2,X1)
        & sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),X3) = sdtasdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(X2,X3))
        & sdtpldt0(X1,X2) = sdtpldt0(X2,X1)
        & sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2),X3) = sdtpldt0(X1,sdtpldt0(X2,X3)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mArith) ).

fof(m__1820,hypothesis,
    ( xE = sdtasasdt0(xp,xq)
    & aScalar0(xE) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1820) ).

fof(m__1911,hypothesis,
    ( xP = sdtasdt0(xE,xH)
    & aScalar0(xP) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1911) ).

fof(m__1873,hypothesis,
    ( xH = sdtasdt0(xA,xB)
    & aScalar0(xH) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1873) ).

fof(mMulSc,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( aScalar0(X2)
        & aScalar0(X1) )
     => aScalar0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mMulSc) ).

fof(m__1949,hypothesis,
    ( xN = sdtasdt0(xR,xS)
    & aScalar0(xN) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1949) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    sdtasdt0(xP,xP) != sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xH,xH),sdtasdt0(xE,xE)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    sdtasdt0(xP,xP) != sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xH,xH),sdtasdt0(xE,xE)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    sdtasdt0(xP,xP) != sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xH,xH),sdtasdt0(xE,xE)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X21,X22,X23] :
      ( ( ~ aScalar0(X23)
        | ~ aScalar0(X22)
        | ~ aScalar0(X21)
        | sdtasdt0(X21,X22) = sdtasdt0(X22,X21) )
      & ( ~ aScalar0(X23)
        | ~ aScalar0(X22)
        | ~ aScalar0(X21)
        | sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X21,X22),X23) = sdtasdt0(X21,sdtasdt0(X22,X23)) )
      & ( ~ aScalar0(X23)
        | ~ aScalar0(X22)
        | ~ aScalar0(X21)
        | sdtpldt0(X21,X22) = sdtpldt0(X22,X21) )
      & ( ~ aScalar0(X23)
        | ~ aScalar0(X22)
        | ~ aScalar0(X21)
        | sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(X21,X22),X23) = sdtpldt0(X21,sdtpldt0(X22,X23)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mArith])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    sdtasdt0(xP,xP) != sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xH,xH),sdtasdt0(xE,xE)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ aScalar0(X3)
    | ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1)
    | sdtasdt0(X1,X2) = sdtasdt0(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ aScalar0(X1)
    | ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE))
    | ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xH,xH))
    | sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE),sdtasdt0(xH,xH)) != sdtasdt0(xP,xP) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ aScalar0(X3)
    | ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1)
    | sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),X3) = sdtasdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xE),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1820]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    xP = sdtasdt0(xE,xH),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1911]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xH),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1873]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ aScalar0(X1)
    | ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE))
    | ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xH,xH))
    | sdtasdt0(xE,sdtasdt0(xE,sdtasdt0(xH,xH))) != sdtasdt0(xP,xP) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
    ( ~ aScalar0(X1)
    | sdtasdt0(xE,sdtasdt0(xH,X1)) = sdtasdt0(xP,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ aScalar0(X1)
    | ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE))
    | ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xH,xH))
    | sdtasdt0(xE,sdtasdt0(xP,xH)) != sdtasdt0(xP,xP) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xP),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1911]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1)
    | ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE))
    | ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xH,xH))
    | sdtasdt0(xE,sdtasdt0(xH,xP)) != sdtasdt0(xP,xP) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_12]),c_0_17]),c_0_21])]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X17,X18] :
      ( aScalar0(sdtasdt0(X17,X18))
      | ~ aScalar0(X18)
      | ~ aScalar0(X17) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mMulSc])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
    ( ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1)
    | ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE))
    | ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xH,xH)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_19]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1)
    | aScalar0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
    ( ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1)
    | ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
    ( ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_25]),c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xN),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1949]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
    ~ aScalar0(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_29]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : RNG055+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 04:11:26 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.35  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.51  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1397840 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.14/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.51  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.51  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.51  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % new_bool_3 with pid 1397851 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.14/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.51  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.51  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.51  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.51  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.51  
% 0.14/0.51  % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.51  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.51  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.51  % Parsed axioms                        : 57
% 0.14/0.51  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Initial clauses                      : 95
% 0.14/0.51  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 5
% 0.14/0.51  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 90
% 0.14/0.51  % Processed clauses                    : 218
% 0.14/0.51  % ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.14/0.51  % ...subsumed                          : 14
% 0.14/0.51  % ...remaining for further processing  : 203
% 0.14/0.51  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 5
% 0.14/0.51  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Backward-subsumed                    : 35
% 0.14/0.51  % Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.14/0.51  % Generated clauses                    : 378
% 0.14/0.51  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 311
% 0.14/0.51  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Paramodulations                      : 355
% 0.14/0.51  % Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.14/0.51  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Equation resolutions                 : 8
% 0.14/0.51  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Total rewrite steps                  : 328
% 0.14/0.51  % ...of those cached                   : 297
% 0.14/0.51  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.51  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.51  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.51  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.51  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.51  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.51  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.51  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.51  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.51  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.51  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.51  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.51  % Current number of processed clauses  : 61
% 0.14/0.51  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 39
% 0.14/0.51  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.51  %    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.14/0.51  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 19
% 0.14/0.51  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 272
% 0.14/0.51  % ...number of literals in the above   : 879
% 0.14/0.51  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Current number of archived clauses   : 139
% 0.14/0.51  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1610
% 0.14/0.51  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 572
% 0.14/0.51  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 28
% 0.14/0.51  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 29
% 0.14/0.51  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.14/0.51  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.14/0.51  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 11394
% 0.14/0.51  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 913
% 0.14/0.51  
% 0.14/0.51  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.51  % User time                : 0.018 s
% 0.14/0.51  % System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.14/0.51  % Total time               : 0.027 s
% 0.14/0.51  % Maximum resident set size: 3648 pages
% 0.14/0.51  
% 0.14/0.51  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.51  % User time                : 0.203 s
% 0.14/0.51  % System time              : 0.035 s
% 0.14/0.51  % Total time               : 0.238 s
% 0.14/0.51  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.14/0.51  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------