↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : RNG077+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:05:45 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   65 (  23 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   69 (  30   ~;  24   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;  10 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   1 sgn  10   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
    sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtasdt0(xH,xH)) = sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xE,xH),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xH,xE),sdtasdt0(xH,xH))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

fof(mArith,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( aScalar0(X3)
        & aScalar0(X2)
        & aScalar0(X1) )
     => ( sdtasdt0(X1,X2) = sdtasdt0(X2,X1)
        & sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),X3) = sdtasdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(X2,X3))
        & sdtpldt0(X1,X2) = sdtpldt0(X2,X1)
        & sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2),X3) = sdtpldt0(X1,sdtpldt0(X2,X3)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mArith) ).

fof(m__1949,hypothesis,
    ( xN = sdtasdt0(xR,xS)
    & aScalar0(xN) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1949) ).

fof(m__1911,hypothesis,
    ( xP = sdtasdt0(xE,xH)
    & aScalar0(xP) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1911) ).

fof(m__1820,hypothesis,
    ( xE = sdtasasdt0(xp,xq)
    & aScalar0(xE) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1820) ).

fof(m__1873,hypothesis,
    ( xH = sdtasdt0(xA,xB)
    & aScalar0(xH) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1873) ).

fof(mMulSc,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( aScalar0(X2)
        & aScalar0(X1) )
     => aScalar0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mMulSc) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtasdt0(xH,xH)) != sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xE,xH),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xH,xE),sdtasdt0(xH,xH))),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X55,X56,X57] :
      ( ( ~ aScalar0(X57)
        | ~ aScalar0(X56)
        | ~ aScalar0(X55)
        | sdtasdt0(X55,X56) = sdtasdt0(X56,X55) )
      & ( ~ aScalar0(X57)
        | ~ aScalar0(X56)
        | ~ aScalar0(X55)
        | sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X55,X56),X57) = sdtasdt0(X55,sdtasdt0(X56,X57)) )
      & ( ~ aScalar0(X57)
        | ~ aScalar0(X56)
        | ~ aScalar0(X55)
        | sdtpldt0(X55,X56) = sdtpldt0(X56,X55) )
      & ( ~ aScalar0(X57)
        | ~ aScalar0(X56)
        | ~ aScalar0(X55)
        | sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(X55,X56),X57) = sdtpldt0(X55,sdtpldt0(X56,X57)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mArith])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtasdt0(xH,xH)) != sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xE,xH),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xH,xE),sdtasdt0(xH,xH))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ aScalar0(X3)
    | ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1)
    | sdtasdt0(X1,X2) = sdtasdt0(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xN),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1949]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtasdt0(xH,xH)) != sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xE,xH),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xH,xE),sdtasdt0(xH,xH))),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    xP = sdtasdt0(xE,xH),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1911]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    ( ~ aScalar0(X1)
    | ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | sdtasdt0(X1,X2) = sdtasdt0(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xE),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1820]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xH),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1873]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtasdt0(xH,xH)) != sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xE,xH),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xH,xE),sdtasdt0(xH,xH))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(xH,xE) = xP,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtasdt0(xH,xH)) != sdtpldt0(xP,sdtpldt0(xP,sdtasdt0(xH,xH))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_13]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ aScalar0(X3)
    | ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1)
    | sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2),X3) = sdtpldt0(X1,sdtpldt0(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xP),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1911]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X25,X26] :
      ( aScalar0(sdtasdt0(X25,X26))
      | ~ aScalar0(X26)
      | ~ aScalar0(X25) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mMulSc])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xH,xH)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1)
    | aScalar0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_16])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : RNG077+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.53  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.53  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.53  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.53  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.53  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.54  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.54  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.54  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 04:16:07 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.54  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.54  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.58  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.58  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.62  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.62  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.62  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.62  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.62  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.62  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.62  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.62  % new_bool_1 with pid 154168 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.62  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.14/0.62  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.62  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.62  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.62  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.62  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.62  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.62  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.62  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.62  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.62  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.62  % SubtermCWHack with pid 154174 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.62  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.62  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.62  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.62  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.62  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.62  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.62  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.62  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.62  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.62  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.62  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.62  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.62  
% 0.14/0.62  % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.62  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.62  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.62  % Parsed axioms                        : 59
% 0.14/0.62  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 4
% 0.14/0.62  % Initial clauses                      : 85
% 0.14/0.62  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 5
% 0.14/0.62  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 80
% 0.14/0.62  % Processed clauses                    : 320
% 0.14/0.62  % ...of these trivial                  : 4
% 0.14/0.62  % ...subsumed                          : 90
% 0.14/0.62  % ...remaining for further processing  : 226
% 0.14/0.62  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 5
% 0.14/0.62  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.62  % Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.14/0.62  % Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 0.14/0.62  % Generated clauses                    : 824
% 0.14/0.62  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 680
% 0.14/0.62  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.62  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.14/0.62  % Paramodulations                      : 816
% 0.14/0.62  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.14/0.62  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.62  % Equation resolutions                 : 8
% 0.14/0.62  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.14/0.62  % Total rewrite steps                  : 770
% 0.14/0.62  % ...of those cached                   : 726
% 0.14/0.62  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.62  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.62  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.62  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.62  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.62  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.62  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.62  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.62  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.62  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.62  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.62  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.62  % Current number of processed clauses  : 218
% 0.14/0.62  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 61
% 0.14/0.62  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.62  %    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.14/0.62  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 154
% 0.14/0.62  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 414
% 0.14/0.62  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1829
% 0.14/0.62  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.62  % Current number of archived clauses   : 5
% 0.14/0.62  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7314
% 0.14/0.62  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5483
% 0.14/0.62  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 90
% 0.14/0.62  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 771
% 0.14/0.62  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.62  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.14/0.62  % BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.14/0.62  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.62  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.62  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 17780
% 0.14/0.62  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 920
% 0.14/0.62  
% 0.14/0.62  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.62  % User time                : 0.016 s
% 0.14/0.62  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.62  % Total time               : 0.021 s
% 0.14/0.62  % Maximum resident set size: 3960 pages
% 0.14/0.62  
% 0.14/0.62  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.62  % User time                : 0.020 s
% 0.14/0.62  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.14/0.62  % Total time               : 0.027 s
% 0.14/0.62  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.14/0.62  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------