↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : RNG079+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:26:50 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.32s 23.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.32s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   41 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   29 (  11   ~;   8   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;  10 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   0 sgn   8   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(mDistr2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ( aScalar0(X1)
        & aScalar0(X2)
        & aScalar0(X3)
        & aScalar0(X4) )
     => sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2),sdtpldt0(X3,X4)) = sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X3),sdtasdt0(X1,X4)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(X2,X3),sdtasdt0(X2,X4))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',mDistr2) ).

fof(m__,conjecture,
    sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xE,xH),sdtpldt0(xE,xH)),sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xC,xF),sdtpldt0(xD,xG))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__) ).

fof(m__2905,hypothesis,
    sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE),sdtasdt0(xE,xH)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xH,xE),sdtasdt0(xH,xH))),sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xC,xD),sdtasdt0(xC,xG)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xF,xD),sdtasdt0(xF,xG)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__2905) ).

fof(m__1873,hypothesis,
    ( aScalar0(xH)
    & xH = sdtasdt0(xA,xB) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__1873) ).

fof(m__1820,hypothesis,
    ( aScalar0(xE)
    & xE = sdtasasdt0(xp,xq) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__1820) ).

fof(m__1854,hypothesis,
    ( aScalar0(xG)
    & xG = sdtasdt0(xB,xB) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__1854) ).

fof(m__1800,hypothesis,
    ( aScalar0(xD)
    & xD = sdtasasdt0(xq,xq) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__1800) ).

fof(m__1837,hypothesis,
    ( aScalar0(xF)
    & xF = sdtasdt0(xA,xA) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__1837) ).

fof(m__1783,hypothesis,
    ( aScalar0(xC)
    & xC = sdtasasdt0(xp,xp) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__1783) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ~ aScalar0(X5)
      | ~ aScalar0(X6)
      | ~ aScalar0(X7)
      | ~ aScalar0(X8)
      | sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(X5,X6),sdtpldt0(X7,X8)) = sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(X5,X7),sdtasdt0(X5,X8)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(X6,X7),sdtasdt0(X6,X8))) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mDistr2])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xE,xH),sdtpldt0(xE,xH)),sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xC,xF),sdtpldt0(xD,xG))),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE),sdtasdt0(xE,xH)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xH,xE),sdtasdt0(xH,xH))),sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xC,xD),sdtasdt0(xC,xG)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xF,xD),sdtasdt0(xF,xG)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__2905]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2),sdtpldt0(X3,X4)) = sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X3),sdtasdt0(X1,X4)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(X2,X3),sdtasdt0(X2,X4)))
    | ~ aScalar0(X4)
    | ~ aScalar0(X3)
    | ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xH),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1873]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xE),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1820]) ).

fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xE,xH),sdtpldt0(xE,xH)),sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xC,xF),sdtpldt0(xD,xG))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xE,xH),sdtpldt0(xE,xH)),sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xC,xD),sdtasdt0(xC,xG)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xF,xD),sdtasdt0(xF,xG)))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xG),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1854]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xD),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1800]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xF),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1837]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xC),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1783]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xE,xH),sdtpldt0(xE,xH)),sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xC,xF),sdtpldt0(xD,xG))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_12]),c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),c_0_21]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : RNG079+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon May 30 12:03:46 EDT 2022
% 0.18/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.32/23.39  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.32/23.40  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.32/23.40  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.32/23.40  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.32/23.51  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.32/23.51  
% 0.32/23.51  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.32/23.51  # OLD status Res
% 0.32/23.51  # Preprocessing time       : 0.017 s
% 0.32/23.51  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_773c90a94152ea2e8c9d3df9c4b1eb6152c40c03 for 23 seconds:
% 0.32/23.51  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,,100,1.0)
% 0.32/23.51  # Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
% 0.32/23.51  
% 0.32/23.51  # Proof found!
% 0.32/23.51  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.32/23.51  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.32/23.52  # Proof object total steps             : 23
% 0.32/23.52  # Proof object clause steps            : 11
% 0.32/23.52  # Proof object formula steps           : 12
% 0.32/23.52  # Proof object conjectures             : 4
% 0.32/23.52  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 1
% 0.32/23.52  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.32/23.52  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 9
% 0.32/23.52  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 9
% 0.32/23.52  # Proof object generating inferences   : 2
% 0.32/23.52  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 9
% 0.32/23.52  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.32/23.52  # Parsed axioms                        : 61
% 0.32/23.52  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 4
% 0.32/23.52  # Initial clauses                      : 83
% 0.32/23.52  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 5
% 0.32/23.52  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 78
% 0.32/23.52  # Processed clauses                    : 88
% 0.32/23.52  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.32/23.52  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.32/23.52  # ...remaining for further processing  : 88
% 0.32/23.52  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.32/23.52  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.32/23.52  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.32/23.52  # Backward-rewritten                   : 5
% 0.32/23.52  # Generated clauses                    : 204
% 0.32/23.52  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 198
% 0.32/23.52  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.32/23.52  # Paramodulations                      : 198
% 0.32/23.52  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.32/23.52  # Equation resolutions                 : 6
% 0.32/23.52  # Current number of processed clauses  : 83
% 0.32/23.52  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 40
% 0.32/23.52  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.32/23.52  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.32/23.52  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 41
% 0.32/23.52  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 188
% 0.32/23.52  # ...number of literals in the above   : 915
% 0.32/23.52  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.32/23.52  # Current number of archived clauses   : 5
% 0.32/23.52  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 786
% 0.32/23.52  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 208
% 0.32/23.52  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.32/23.52  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27
% 0.32/23.52  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.32/23.52  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.32/23.52  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.32/23.52  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.32/23.52  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.32/23.52  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 9734
% 0.32/23.52  
% 0.32/23.52  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.32/23.52  # User time                : 0.013 s
% 0.32/23.52  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.32/23.52  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 0.32/23.52  # Maximum resident set size: 3960 pages
% 0.32/46.42  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.32/46.43  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.32/46.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/46.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/46.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/46.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/46.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/46.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/46.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/46.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/46.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/46.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/46.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/46.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/46.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/46.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/46.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/46.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/46.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/46.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/46.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/46.50  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------