↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : RNG090+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:05:48 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   44 (  24 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  107 (  21 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   99 (  36   ~;  29   |;  23   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  11  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (   0 sgn  30   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
    sdtpldt0(xx,xy) = sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xk,xm),sdtpldt0(xl,xn)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

fof(mEOfElem,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aSet0(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( aElementOf0(X2,X1)
         => aElement0(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mEOfElem) ).

fof(m__870,hypothesis,
    ( aIdeal0(xJ)
    & ! [X1] :
        ( aElementOf0(X1,xJ)
       => ( ! [X2] :
              ( aElement0(X2)
             => aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(X2,X1),xJ) )
          & ! [X2] :
              ( aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
             => aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2),xJ) ) ) )
    & aSet0(xJ)
    & aIdeal0(xI)
    & ! [X1] :
        ( aElementOf0(X1,xI)
       => ( ! [X2] :
              ( aElement0(X2)
             => aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(X2,X1),xI) )
          & ! [X2] :
              ( aElementOf0(X2,xI)
             => aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2),xI) ) ) )
    & aSet0(xI) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__870) ).

fof(mAddAsso,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( aElement0(X3)
        & aElement0(X2)
        & aElement0(X1) )
     => sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2),X3) = sdtpldt0(X1,sdtpldt0(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mAddAsso) ).

fof(m__967,hypothesis,
    ( xy = sdtpldt0(xm,xn)
    & aElementOf0(xn,xJ)
    & aElementOf0(xm,xI) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__967) ).

fof(m__994,hypothesis,
    ( aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xl,xn),xJ)
    & aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xk,xm),xI) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__994) ).

fof(m__934,hypothesis,
    ( xx = sdtpldt0(xk,xl)
    & aElementOf0(xl,xJ)
    & aElementOf0(xk,xI) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__934) ).

fof(mAddComm,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( aElement0(X2)
        & aElement0(X1) )
     => sdtpldt0(X1,X2) = sdtpldt0(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mAddComm) ).

fof(mSortsB,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( aElement0(X2)
        & aElement0(X1) )
     => aElement0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mSortsB) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    sdtpldt0(xx,xy) != sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xk,xm),sdtpldt0(xl,xn)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X34,X35] :
      ( aElement0(X35)
      | ~ aElementOf0(X35,X34)
      | ~ aSet0(X34) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mEOfElem])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    ! [X70,X71,X72,X73,X74,X75] :
      ( aIdeal0(xJ)
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X73,xJ)
        | aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(X75,X73),xJ)
        | ~ aElement0(X75) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X73,xJ)
        | aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X73,X74),xJ)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X74,xJ) )
      & aSet0(xJ)
      & aIdeal0(xI)
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X70,xI)
        | aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(X72,X70),xI)
        | ~ aElement0(X72) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X70,xI)
        | aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X70,X71),xI)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X71,xI) )
      & aSet0(xI) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[m__870])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    sdtpldt0(xx,xy) != sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xk,xm),sdtpldt0(xl,xn)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X15,X16,X17] :
      ( sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(X15,X16),X17) = sdtpldt0(X15,sdtpldt0(X16,X17))
      | ~ aElement0(X17)
      | ~ aElement0(X16)
      | ~ aElement0(X15) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mAddAsso])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(X2,X1)
    | ~ aSet0(X1)
    | aElement0(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xn,xJ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__967]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    aSet0(xJ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xm,xI),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__967]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
    aSet0(xI),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    sdtpldt0(xx,xy) != sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xk,xm),sdtpldt0(xl,xn)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xl,xn),xJ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__994]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xk,xI),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__934]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ aElement0(X3)
    | ~ aElement0(X2)
    | ~ aElement0(X1)
    | sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2),X3) = sdtpldt0(X1,sdtpldt0(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
    xy = sdtpldt0(xm,xn),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__967]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xn),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xm),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X13,X14] :
      ( sdtpldt0(X13,X14) = sdtpldt0(X14,X13)
      | ~ aElement0(X14)
      | ~ aElement0(X13) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mAddComm])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    sdtpldt0(xx,xy) != sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xk,xm),sdtpldt0(xl,xn)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,hypothesis,
    aElement0(sdtpldt0(xl,xn)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_20]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xk),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_21]),c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
    ( ~ aElement0(X1)
    | sdtpldt0(xm,sdtpldt0(xn,X1)) = sdtpldt0(xy,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]),c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ aElement0(X2)
    | ~ aElement0(X1)
    | sdtpldt0(X1,X2) = sdtpldt0(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xl,xJ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__934]) ).

fof(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X9,X10] :
      ( aElement0(sdtpldt0(X9,X10))
      | ~ aElement0(X10)
      | ~ aElement0(X9) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mSortsB])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    sdtpldt0(xk,sdtpldt0(xm,sdtpldt0(xl,xn))) != sdtpldt0(xx,xy),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_22]),c_0_28]),c_0_25]),c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,hypothesis,
    ( ~ aElement0(X1)
    | sdtpldt0(xm,sdtpldt0(X1,xn)) = sdtpldt0(xy,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xl),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_32]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ aElement0(X2)
    | ~ aElement0(X1)
    | aElement0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    sdtpldt0(xk,sdtpldt0(xy,xl)) != sdtpldt0(xx,xy),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xy),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_23]),c_0_24]),c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,hypothesis,
    xx = sdtpldt0(xk,xl),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__934]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    sdtpldt0(xk,sdtpldt0(xl,xy)) != sdtpldt0(xx,xy),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_31]),c_0_36]),c_0_39])]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,hypothesis,
    ( ~ aElement0(X1)
    | sdtpldt0(xk,sdtpldt0(xl,X1)) = sdtpldt0(xx,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_40]),c_0_36]),c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_39])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : RNG090+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 04:20:46 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.45  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 3390247 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.14/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.45  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.45  % Search class: FGUSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.45  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_B07----D_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % new_bool_3 with pid 3390257 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.14/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.45  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.45  % Search class: FGUSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.45  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_B07----D_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.45  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.45  
% 0.14/0.45  % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.45  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.45  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.46  % Parsed axioms                        : 31
% 0.14/0.46  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Initial clauses                      : 82
% 0.14/0.46  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.14/0.46  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 80
% 0.14/0.46  % Processed clauses                    : 207
% 0.14/0.46  % ...of these trivial                  : 6
% 0.14/0.46  % ...subsumed                          : 4
% 0.14/0.46  % ...remaining for further processing  : 197
% 0.14/0.46  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 10
% 0.14/0.46  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.14/0.46  % Generated clauses                    : 375
% 0.14/0.46  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 346
% 0.14/0.46  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Paramodulations                      : 366
% 0.14/0.46  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Equation resolutions                 : 10
% 0.14/0.46  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Total rewrite steps                  : 270
% 0.14/0.46  % ...of those cached                   : 243
% 0.14/0.46  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.46  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.46  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.46  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.46  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.46  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.46  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.46  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.46  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.46  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.46  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.46  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.46  % Current number of processed clauses  : 106
% 0.14/0.46  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 50
% 0.14/0.46  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.46  %    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 0.14/0.46  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 51
% 0.14/0.46  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 299
% 0.14/0.46  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1151
% 0.14/0.46  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Current number of archived clauses   : 82
% 0.14/0.46  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 865
% 0.14/0.46  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 300
% 0.14/0.46  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
% 0.14/0.46  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 91
% 0.14/0.46  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.14/0.46  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.14/0.46  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 11521
% 0.14/0.46  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1124
% 0.14/0.46  
% 0.14/0.46  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.46  % User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.14/0.46  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.46  % Total time               : 0.019 s
% 0.14/0.46  % Maximum resident set size: 3676 pages
% 0.14/0.46  
% 0.14/0.46  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.46  % User time                : 0.057 s
% 0.14/0.46  % System time              : 0.017 s
% 0.14/0.46  % Total time               : 0.074 s
% 0.14/0.46  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.14/0.46  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------