%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : RNG091+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:05:48 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.11s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 54 ( 15 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 16 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 64 ( 26 ~; 23 |; 15 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn 4 !; 8 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
( ( aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(xz,xx),sdtpldt1(xI,xJ))
| ? [X1,X2] :
( sdtpldt0(X1,X2) = sdtasdt0(xz,xx)
& aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
& aElementOf0(X1,xI) ) )
& ( aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt1(xI,xJ))
| ? [X1,X2] :
( sdtpldt0(X1,X2) = sdtpldt0(xx,xy)
& aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
& aElementOf0(X1,xI) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).
fof(m__1061,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(xx,xy) = sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xk,xm),sdtpldt0(xl,xn)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1061) ).
fof(m__994,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xl,xn),xJ)
& aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xk,xm),xI) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__994) ).
fof(m__1098,hypothesis,
sdtasdt0(xz,xx) = sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xz,xk),sdtasdt0(xz,xl)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1098) ).
fof(m__1021,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(xz,xl),xJ)
& aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(xz,xk),xI) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1021) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(xz,xx),sdtpldt1(xI,xJ))
| ? [X1,X2] :
( sdtpldt0(X1,X2) = sdtasdt0(xz,xx)
& aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
& aElementOf0(X1,xI) ) )
& ( aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt1(xI,xJ))
| ? [X1,X2] :
( sdtpldt0(X1,X2) = sdtpldt0(xx,xy)
& aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
& aElementOf0(X1,xI) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X80,X81,X82,X83] :
( ( ~ aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt1(xI,xJ))
| ~ aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(xz,xx),sdtpldt1(xI,xJ)) )
& ( ~ aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt1(xI,xJ))
| sdtpldt0(X82,X83) != sdtasdt0(xz,xx)
| ~ aElementOf0(X83,xJ)
| ~ aElementOf0(X82,xI) )
& ( sdtpldt0(X80,X81) != sdtpldt0(xx,xy)
| ~ aElementOf0(X81,xJ)
| ~ aElementOf0(X80,xI)
| ~ aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(xz,xx),sdtpldt1(xI,xJ)) )
& ( sdtpldt0(X80,X81) != sdtpldt0(xx,xy)
| ~ aElementOf0(X81,xJ)
| ~ aElementOf0(X80,xI)
| sdtpldt0(X82,X83) != sdtasdt0(xz,xx)
| ~ aElementOf0(X83,xJ)
| ~ aElementOf0(X82,xI) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( sdtpldt0(X3,X4) != sdtpldt0(xx,xy)
| ~ aElementOf0(X4,xJ)
| ~ aElementOf0(X3,xI)
| sdtpldt0(X1,X2) != sdtasdt0(xz,xx)
| ~ aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,xI) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(xx,xy) = sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xk,xm),sdtpldt0(xl,xn)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1061]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xl,xn),xJ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__994]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xk,xm),xI),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__994]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
( ~ aElementOf0(X1,xI)
| ~ aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
| sdtpldt0(X1,X2) != sdtasdt0(xz,xx) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
sdtasdt0(xz,xx) = sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xz,xk),sdtasdt0(xz,xl)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1098]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(xz,xl),xJ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1021]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(xz,xk),xI),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1021]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : RNG091+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 04:21:50 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2416096 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.45 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.45 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2SI with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2g with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_107_C48_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2g with pid 2416105 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2g
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.45 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.45 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2SI with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2g with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.11/0.45
% 0.11/0.45 % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.45 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.11/0.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 33
% 0.11/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Initial clauses : 87
% 0.11/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.11/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 85
% 0.11/0.45 % Processed clauses : 195
% 0.11/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 195
% 0.11/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 10
% 0.11/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 4
% 0.11/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Generated clauses : 400
% 0.11/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 389
% 0.11/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Paramodulations : 389
% 0.11/0.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 12
% 0.11/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 103
% 0.11/0.45 % ...of those cached : 85
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 97
% 0.11/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 58
% 0.11/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.11/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 36
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 349
% 0.11/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 640
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 89
% 0.11/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 874
% 0.11/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 320
% 0.11/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.11/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 85
% 0.11/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 10670
% 0.11/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1192
% 0.11/0.45
% 0.11/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45 % User time : 0.011 s
% 0.11/0.45 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3676 pages
% 0.11/0.45
% 0.11/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45 % User time : 0.061 s
% 0.11/0.45 % System time : 0.014 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Total time : 0.075 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.11/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------