%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : RNG105+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:05:52 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 32 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 98 ( 21 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 32 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 113 ( 47 ~; 45 |; 16 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 19 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 0 sgn 18 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(mDefPrIdeal,axiom,
! [X1] :
( aElement0(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( X2 = slsdtgt0(X1)
<=> ( ! [X3] :
( aElementOf0(X3,X2)
<=> ? [X4] :
( sdtasdt0(X1,X4) = X3
& aElement0(X4) ) )
& aSet0(X2) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDefPrIdeal) ).
fof(m__,conjecture,
( aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(xz,xx),slsdtgt0(xc))
& aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),slsdtgt0(xc)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).
fof(m__2010,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(xx,xy) = sdtasdt0(xc,sdtpldt0(xu,xv)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2010) ).
fof(m__1905,hypothesis,
aElement0(xc),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1905) ).
fof(m__2043,hypothesis,
sdtasdt0(xz,xx) = sdtasdt0(xc,sdtasdt0(xu,xz)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2043) ).
fof(mSortsB,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( aElement0(X2)
& aElement0(X1) )
=> aElement0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mSortsB) ).
fof(m__1979,hypothesis,
( sdtasdt0(xc,xv) = xy
& aElement0(xv) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1979) ).
fof(m__1956,hypothesis,
( sdtasdt0(xc,xu) = xx
& aElement0(xu) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1956) ).
fof(mSortsB_02,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( aElement0(X2)
& aElement0(X1) )
=> aElement0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mSortsB_02) ).
fof(m__1933,hypothesis,
( aElement0(xz)
& aElementOf0(xy,slsdtgt0(xc))
& aElementOf0(xx,slsdtgt0(xc)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1933) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X14,X15,X16,X18,X19,X20,X22] :
( ( ~ aElement0(X14)
| X20 = slsdtgt0(X14)
| ~ aSet0(X20)
| aElementOf0(esk4_2(X14,X20),X20)
| sdtasdt0(X14,esk5_2(X14,X20)) = esk4_2(X14,X20) )
& ( ~ aElement0(X14)
| X20 = slsdtgt0(X14)
| ~ aSet0(X20)
| aElementOf0(esk4_2(X14,X20),X20)
| aElement0(esk5_2(X14,X20)) )
& ( ~ aElement0(X14)
| X20 = slsdtgt0(X14)
| ~ aSet0(X20)
| sdtasdt0(X14,X22) != esk4_2(X14,X20)
| ~ aElement0(X22)
| ~ aElementOf0(esk4_2(X14,X20),X20) )
& ( ~ aElement0(X14)
| X15 != slsdtgt0(X14)
| aElementOf0(X18,X15)
| sdtasdt0(X14,X19) != X18
| ~ aElement0(X19) )
& ( ~ aElement0(X14)
| X15 != slsdtgt0(X14)
| ~ aElementOf0(X16,X15)
| sdtasdt0(X14,esk3_3(X14,X15,X16)) = X16 )
& ( ~ aElement0(X14)
| X15 != slsdtgt0(X14)
| ~ aElementOf0(X16,X15)
| aElement0(esk3_3(X14,X15,X16)) )
& ( ~ aElement0(X14)
| X15 != slsdtgt0(X14)
| aSet0(X15) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mDefPrIdeal])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ ( aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(xz,xx),slsdtgt0(xc))
& aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),slsdtgt0(xc)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ aElement0(X2)
| X4 != slsdtgt0(X2)
| sdtasdt0(X2,X1) != X3
| ~ aElement0(X1)
| aElementOf0(X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(xz,xx),slsdtgt0(xc))
| ~ aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),slsdtgt0(xc)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ aElement0(X2)
| ~ aElement0(X1)
| aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),slsdtgt0(X1)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(xx,xy) = sdtasdt0(xc,sdtpldt0(xu,xv)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__2010]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
aElement0(xc),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1905]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(xz,xx),slsdtgt0(xc))
| ~ aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),slsdtgt0(xc)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
( ~ aElement0(sdtpldt0(xu,xv))
| aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),slsdtgt0(xc)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
sdtasdt0(xz,xx) = sdtasdt0(xc,sdtasdt0(xu,xz)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__2043]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
( ~ aElement0(sdtpldt0(xu,xv))
| ~ aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(xz,xx),slsdtgt0(xc)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
( ~ aElement0(sdtasdt0(xu,xz))
| aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(xz,xx),slsdtgt0(xc)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_19]),c_0_16])]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
! [X34,X35] :
( aElement0(sdtpldt0(X34,X35))
| ~ aElement0(X35)
| ~ aElement0(X34) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mSortsB])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
( ~ aElement0(sdtasdt0(xu,xz))
| ~ aElement0(sdtpldt0(xu,xv)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ aElement0(X2)
| ~ aElement0(X1)
| aElement0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
aElement0(xv),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1979]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
aElement0(xu),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1956]) ).
fof(c_0_27,plain,
! [X24,X25] :
( aElement0(sdtasdt0(X24,X25))
| ~ aElement0(X25)
| ~ aElement0(X24) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mSortsB_02])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,hypothesis,
~ aElement0(sdtasdt0(xu,xz)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ aElement0(X2)
| ~ aElement0(X1)
| aElement0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
aElement0(xz),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1933]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30]),c_0_26])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : RNG105+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.06 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.45 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.45 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.45 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.45 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.45 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.45 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.45 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.45 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 04:19:35 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.22/0.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.60 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.22/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.60 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.60 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.60 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.60 % new_bool_3 with pid 4123145 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.60 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.22/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.60 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.60 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.22/0.60 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.60 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.60 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.60 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.60 % SubtermCWHack with pid 4123153 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.60 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.22/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.60 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.60 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.22/0.60 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.60 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.60 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.60 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.60 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.60
% 0.22/0.60 % Proof found!
% 0.22/0.60 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.60 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.60 % Parsed axioms : 44
% 0.22/0.60 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 20
% 0.22/0.60 % Initial clauses : 47
% 0.22/0.60 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.22/0.60 % Initial clauses in saturation : 45
% 0.22/0.60 % Processed clauses : 94
% 0.22/0.60 % ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.22/0.60 % ...subsumed : 26
% 0.22/0.60 % ...remaining for further processing : 66
% 0.22/0.60 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.22/0.60 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.60 % Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.22/0.60 % Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.22/0.60 % Generated clauses : 136
% 0.22/0.60 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 100
% 0.22/0.60 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.60 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/0.60 % Paramodulations : 134
% 0.22/0.60 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.60 % NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.60 % Equation resolutions : 3
% 0.22/0.60 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.22/0.60 % Total rewrite steps : 150
% 0.22/0.60 % ...of those cached : 136
% 0.22/0.60 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.60 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.60 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.60 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.60 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.60 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.60 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.60 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.60 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.60 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.60 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.60 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.60 % Current number of processed clauses : 56
% 0.22/0.60 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 20
% 0.22/0.60 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.60 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.22/0.60 % Non-unit-clauses : 35
% 0.22/0.60 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 35
% 0.22/0.60 % ...number of literals in the above : 134
% 0.22/0.60 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.60 % Current number of archived clauses : 8
% 0.22/0.60 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 125
% 0.22/0.60 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 103
% 0.22/0.60 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 26
% 0.22/0.60 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.22/0.60 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.60 % BW rewrite match attempts : 5
% 0.22/0.60 % BW rewrite match successes : 5
% 0.22/0.60 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.60 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.60 % Termbank termtop insertions : 5029
% 0.22/0.60 % Search garbage collected termcells : 898
% 0.22/0.60
% 0.22/0.60 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.60 % User time : 0.012 s
% 0.22/0.60 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.60 % Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.22/0.60 % Maximum resident set size: 3692 pages
% 0.22/0.60
% 0.22/0.60 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.60 % User time : 0.016 s
% 0.22/0.60 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.22/0.60 % Total time : 0.024 s
% 0.22/0.60 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.22/0.60 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------