%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : RNG116+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:25:02 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.85s 2.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.85s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 24 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 24 RR)
% Number of literals : 45 ( 14 equ; 24 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_90,plain,
( sdtasdt0(X1,esk18_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X3
| X2 != slsdtgt0(X1)
| ~ aElement0(X1)
| ~ aElementOf0(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-d5q3nryn/input.p',i_0_90) ).
cnf(i_0_91,plain,
( aElement0(esk18_3(X1,X2,X3))
| X2 != slsdtgt0(X1)
| ~ aElement0(X1)
| ~ aElementOf0(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-d5q3nryn/input.p',i_0_91) ).
cnf(i_0_111,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xl,slsdtgt0(xb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-d5q3nryn/input.p',i_0_111) ).
cnf(i_0_94,hypothesis,
aElement0(xb),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-d5q3nryn/input.p',i_0_94) ).
cnf(i_0_113,negated_conjecture,
( sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xa,X1),sdtasdt0(xb,X2)) != xu
| ~ aElement0(X2)
| ~ aElement0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-d5q3nryn/input.p',i_0_113) ).
cnf(i_0_112,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xk,slsdtgt0(xa)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-d5q3nryn/input.p',i_0_112) ).
cnf(i_0_95,hypothesis,
aElement0(xa),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-d5q3nryn/input.p',i_0_95) ).
cnf(i_0_110,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(xk,xl) = xu,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-d5q3nryn/input.p',i_0_110) ).
cnf(c_0_122,plain,
( sdtasdt0(X1,esk18_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X3
| X2 != slsdtgt0(X1)
| ~ aElement0(X1)
| ~ aElementOf0(X3,X2) ),
i_0_90 ).
cnf(c_0_123,plain,
( aElement0(esk18_3(X1,X2,X3))
| X2 != slsdtgt0(X1)
| ~ aElement0(X1)
| ~ aElementOf0(X3,X2) ),
i_0_91 ).
cnf(c_0_124,plain,
( sdtasdt0(X1,esk18_3(X1,slsdtgt0(X1),X2)) = X2
| ~ aElementOf0(X2,slsdtgt0(X1))
| ~ aElement0(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_122]) ).
cnf(c_0_125,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xl,slsdtgt0(xb)),
i_0_111 ).
cnf(c_0_126,hypothesis,
aElement0(xb),
i_0_94 ).
cnf(c_0_127,plain,
( aElement0(esk18_3(X1,slsdtgt0(X1),X2))
| ~ aElementOf0(X2,slsdtgt0(X1))
| ~ aElement0(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_123]) ).
cnf(c_0_128,negated_conjecture,
( sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xa,X1),sdtasdt0(xb,X2)) != xu
| ~ aElement0(X2)
| ~ aElement0(X1) ),
i_0_113 ).
cnf(c_0_129,hypothesis,
sdtasdt0(xb,esk18_3(xb,slsdtgt0(xb),xl)) = xl,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_124,c_0_125]),c_0_126])]) ).
cnf(c_0_130,hypothesis,
aElement0(esk18_3(xb,slsdtgt0(xb),xl)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_127,c_0_125]),c_0_126])]) ).
cnf(c_0_131,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xk,slsdtgt0(xa)),
i_0_112 ).
cnf(c_0_132,hypothesis,
aElement0(xa),
i_0_95 ).
cnf(c_0_133,negated_conjecture,
( sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xa,X1),xl) != xu
| ~ aElement0(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_128,c_0_129]),c_0_130])]) ).
cnf(c_0_134,hypothesis,
sdtasdt0(xa,esk18_3(xa,slsdtgt0(xa),xk)) = xk,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_124,c_0_131]),c_0_132])]) ).
cnf(c_0_135,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(xk,xl) = xu,
i_0_110 ).
cnf(c_0_136,hypothesis,
aElement0(esk18_3(xa,slsdtgt0(xa),xk)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_127,c_0_131]),c_0_132])]) ).
cnf(c_0_137,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_133,c_0_134]),c_0_135]),c_0_136])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : RNG116+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 30 13:00:36 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.85/2.45 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.85/2.45 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.85/2.45 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.85/2.45 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d
% 7.85/2.45 # and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp.
% 7.85/2.45 #
% 7.85/2.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 7.85/2.45 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.85/2.45
% 7.85/2.45 # Proof found!
% 7.85/2.45 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.85/2.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.85/2.45 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.85/2.45
% 7.85/2.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.85/2.45 # User time : 0.035 s
% 7.85/2.45 # System time : 0.004 s
% 7.85/2.45 # Total time : 0.040 s
% 7.85/2.45 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.85/2.45
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------