↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.CAX-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : RNG125+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:25:31 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : ContradictoryAxioms 17.95s 5.64s
% Output   : Refutation 17.95s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   6 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   74 (  18 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  177 (  25   ~;  24   |;  28   &; 100   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   13 (  10 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (   0   ^;   2   !;  10   ?;  14   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   2  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(aElement0_decl,type,
    aElement0: $i > $o ).

thf(sdtasdt0_decl,type,
    sdtasdt0: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(doDivides0_decl,type,
    doDivides0: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(aDivisorOf0_decl,type,
    aDivisorOf0: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(xa_decl,type,
    xa: $i ).

thf(xb_decl,type,
    xb: $i ).

thf(xu_decl,type,
    xu: $i ).

thf(sk48_decl,type,
    sk48: $o ).

thf(sk51_decl,type,
    sk51: $i ).

thf(sk52_decl,type,
    sk52: $i ).

thf(sk51_def,definition,
    ( sk51
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ( ( ( A @ ( xu @ sdtasdt0 ) )
            = xa )
          & ( A @ aElement0 ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk52_def,definition,
    ( sk52
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ( ( ( A @ ( xu @ sdtasdt0 ) )
            = xb )
          & ( A @ aElement0 ) ) ) ) ).

thf(48,axiom,
    ~ ( ( ( xb @ ( xu @ aDivisorOf0 ) )
        | ( xb @ ( xu @ doDivides0 ) )
        | ? [A: $i] :
            ( ( ( A @ ( xu @ sdtasdt0 ) )
              = xb )
            & ( A @ aElement0 ) ) )
      & ( ( xa @ ( xu @ aDivisorOf0 ) )
        | ( xa @ ( xu @ doDivides0 ) )
        | ? [A: $i] :
            ( ( ( A @ ( xu @ sdtasdt0 ) )
              = xa )
            & ( A @ aElement0 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2383) ).

thf(433,plain,
    ~ ( ( ( xb @ ( xu @ aDivisorOf0 ) )
        | ( xb @ ( xu @ doDivides0 ) )
        | ? [A: $i] :
            ( ( ( A @ ( xu @ sdtasdt0 ) )
              = xb )
            & ( A @ aElement0 ) ) )
      & ( ( xa @ ( xu @ aDivisorOf0 ) )
        | ( xa @ ( xu @ doDivides0 ) )
        | ? [A: $i] :
            ( ( ( A @ ( xu @ sdtasdt0 ) )
              = xa )
            & ( A @ aElement0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[48]) ).

thf(434,plain,
    ~ ( ( ( xb @ ( xu @ aDivisorOf0 ) )
        | ( xb @ ( xu @ doDivides0 ) )
        | ? [A: $i] :
            ( ( ( A @ ( xu @ sdtasdt0 ) )
              = xb )
            & ( A @ aElement0 ) ) )
      & ( ( xa @ ( xu @ aDivisorOf0 ) )
        | ( xa @ ( xu @ doDivides0 ) )
        | ? [A: $i] :
            ( ( ( A @ ( xu @ sdtasdt0 ) )
              = xa )
            & ( A @ aElement0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[433]) ).

thf(435,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( xb @ ( xu @ aDivisorOf0 ) )
        | sk48 )
      & ( ~ ( xb @ ( xu @ doDivides0 ) )
        | sk48 )
      & ( ( ( B @ ( xu @ sdtasdt0 ) )
         != xb )
        | ~ ( B @ aElement0 )
        | sk48 )
      & ( ~ sk48
        | ~ ( xa @ ( xu @ aDivisorOf0 ) ) )
      & ( ~ sk48
        | ~ ( xa @ ( xu @ doDivides0 ) ) )
      & ( ~ sk48
        | ( ( A @ ( xu @ sdtasdt0 ) )
         != xa )
        | ~ ( A @ aElement0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[434]) ).

thf(438,plain,
    ( ~ ( xb @ ( xu @ doDivides0 ) )
    | sk48 ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[435]) ).

thf(439,plain,
    ( ~ sk48
    | ~ ( xa @ ( xu @ doDivides0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[435]) ).

thf(50,axiom,
    ~ ~ ( ( xa @ ( xu @ doDivides0 ) )
        & ? [A: $i] :
            ( ( ( A @ ( xu @ sdtasdt0 ) )
              = xa )
            & ( A @ aElement0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2479) ).

thf(452,plain,
    ( ( xa @ ( xu @ doDivides0 ) )
    & ? [A: $i] :
        ( ( ( A @ ( xu @ sdtasdt0 ) )
          = xa )
        & ( A @ aElement0 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[50]) ).

thf(453,plain,
    ( ( xa @ ( xu @ doDivides0 ) )
    & ( ( sk51 @ ( xu @ sdtasdt0 ) )
      = xa )
    & ( sk51 @ aElement0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[452]) ).

thf(456,plain,
    xa @ ( xu @ doDivides0 ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[453]) ).

thf(852,plain,
    ( ~ sk48
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[439,456]) ).

thf(853,plain,
    ~ sk48,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[852]) ).

thf(51,axiom,
    ~ ~ ( ( xb @ ( xu @ doDivides0 ) )
        & ? [A: $i] :
            ( ( ( A @ ( xu @ sdtasdt0 ) )
              = xb )
            & ( A @ aElement0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2612) ).

thf(458,plain,
    ( ( xb @ ( xu @ doDivides0 ) )
    & ? [A: $i] :
        ( ( ( A @ ( xu @ sdtasdt0 ) )
          = xb )
        & ( A @ aElement0 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[51]) ).

thf(459,plain,
    ( ( xb @ ( xu @ doDivides0 ) )
    & ( ( sk52 @ ( xu @ sdtasdt0 ) )
      = xb )
    & ( sk52 @ aElement0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[458]) ).

thf(462,plain,
    xb @ ( xu @ doDivides0 ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[459]) ).

thf(2990,plain,
    ( ~ $true
    | $false ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[438,853,462]) ).

thf(2991,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[2990]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : RNG125+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.11/0.40  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.40  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 06:14:05 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.41  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.86/0.99  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.43/1.25  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (252ms). 
% 1.43/1.26  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.24/1.66  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.24/1.67  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.47/1.76  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.47/1.77  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.47/1.78  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.47/1.78  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.47/1.79  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.47/1.79  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.68/1.80  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.68/1.80  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.68/1.80  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.68/1.84  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 49 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.68/1.87  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 49 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.68/1.88  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.68/1.88  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.68/1.88  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.68/1.88  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.68/1.88  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.68/1.89  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.68/1.89  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.68/1.89  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.68/1.89  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.90/1.97  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 2.90/1.98  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.90/1.99  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 17.95/5.64  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 17.95/5.64  % Time passed: 5085ms (effective reasoning time: 4372ms)
% 17.95/5.64  % Axioms used in derivation (3): m__2383, m__2479, m__2612
% 17.95/5.64  % No. of inferences in proof: 18
% 17.95/5.64  % SZS status ContradictoryAxioms for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 5085 ms resp. 4372 ms w/o parsing
% 17.95/5.66  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 17.95/5.66  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------