%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : ROB008-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ug51Fe0Mlg true
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:50:38 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Unsatisfiable 53.84s 8.27s
% Output : Refutation 53.84s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : ROB008-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ug51Fe0Mlg true
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 12:24:23 EDT 2025
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.33 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.11/0.33 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.33 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.11/0.33 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.11/0.33 % Running in FO mode
% 0.42/0.59 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.42/0.59 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.42/0.59 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.48/0.68 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.48/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.48/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.48/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.48/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.48/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.48/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 53.84/8.27 % Solved by fo/fo7.sh.
% 53.84/8.27 % done 214 iterations in 7.540s
% 53.84/8.27 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 53.84/8.27 % SZS output start Refutation
% 53.84/8.27 thf(negate_type, type, negate: $i > $i).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(add_type, type, add: $i > $i > $i).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(condition, axiom,
% 53.84/8.27 (( negate @ ( add @ a @ ( negate @ ( add @ b @ c ) ) ) ) =
% 53.84/8.27 ( negate @ ( add @ a @ ( add @ b @ ( negate @ c ) ) ) ))).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 53.84/8.27 (((negate @ (add @ a @ (negate @ (add @ b @ c))))
% 53.84/8.27 = (negate @ (add @ a @ (add @ b @ (negate @ c)))))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condition])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(commutativity_of_add, axiom, (( add @ X @ Y ) = ( add @ Y @ X ))).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 53.84/8.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 53.84/8.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl118, plain,
% 53.84/8.27 (((negate @ (add @ a @ (negate @ (add @ c @ b))))
% 53.84/8.27 = (negate @ (add @ a @ (add @ (negate @ c) @ b))))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 53.84/8.27 [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 53.84/8.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(associativity_of_add, axiom,
% 53.84/8.27 (( add @ ( add @ X @ Y ) @ Z ) = ( add @ X @ ( add @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 53.84/8.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 53.84/8.27 ((add @ (add @ X0 @ X1) @ X2) = (add @ X0 @ (add @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_add])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 53.84/8.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 53.84/8.27 ((add @ (add @ X1 @ X0) @ X2) = (add @ X0 @ (add @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 53.84/8.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 53.84/8.27 ((add @ (add @ X0 @ X1) @ X2) = (add @ X0 @ (add @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_add])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain,
% 53.84/8.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 53.84/8.27 ((add @ X2 @ (add @ X1 @ X0)) = (add @ X1 @ (add @ X2 @ X0)))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl119, plain,
% 53.84/8.27 (((negate @ (add @ a @ (negate @ (add @ c @ b))))
% 53.84/8.27 = (negate @ (add @ (negate @ c) @ (add @ a @ b))))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl118, zip_derived_cl17])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 53.84/8.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 53.84/8.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(robbins_axiom, axiom,
% 53.84/8.27 (( negate @
% 53.84/8.27 ( add @
% 53.84/8.27 ( negate @ ( add @ X @ Y ) ) @
% 53.84/8.27 ( negate @ ( add @ X @ ( negate @ Y ) ) ) ) ) =
% 53.84/8.27 ( X ))).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 53.84/8.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 53.84/8.27 ((negate @
% 53.84/8.27 (add @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ X1)) @
% 53.84/8.27 (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ X1)))))
% 53.84/8.27 = (X0))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [robbins_axiom])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl412, plain,
% 53.84/8.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 53.84/8.27 ((negate @
% 53.84/8.27 (add @ (negate @ (add @ X1 @ X0)) @
% 53.84/8.27 (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ X1)))))
% 53.84/8.27 = (X0))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl1242, plain,
% 53.84/8.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 53.84/8.27 ((negate @
% 53.84/8.27 (add @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ X1))) @
% 53.84/8.27 (negate @ (add @ X1 @ X0))))
% 53.84/8.27 = (X0))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl412])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl5158, plain,
% 53.84/8.27 (((negate @
% 53.84/8.27 (add @ (negate @ (add @ (negate @ c) @ (add @ a @ b))) @
% 53.84/8.27 (negate @ (add @ (add @ c @ b) @ a))))
% 53.84/8.27 = (a))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl119, zip_derived_cl1242])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 53.84/8.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 53.84/8.27 ((add @ (add @ X0 @ X1) @ X2) = (add @ X0 @ (add @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_add])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 53.84/8.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 53.84/8.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 53.84/8.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 53.84/8.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 53.84/8.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 53.84/8.27 ((negate @
% 53.84/8.27 (add @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ X1)) @
% 53.84/8.27 (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ X1)))))
% 53.84/8.27 = (X0))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [robbins_axiom])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl402, plain,
% 53.84/8.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 53.84/8.27 ((negate @
% 53.84/8.27 (add @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ X1)) @
% 53.84/8.27 (negate @ (add @ (negate @ X1) @ X0))))
% 53.84/8.27 = (X0))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl1186, plain,
% 53.84/8.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 53.84/8.27 ((negate @
% 53.84/8.27 (add @ (negate @ (add @ X1 @ X0)) @
% 53.84/8.27 (negate @ (add @ (negate @ X1) @ X0))))
% 53.84/8.27 = (X0))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl402])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl5225, plain, (((add @ a @ b) = (a))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 53.84/8.27 [zip_derived_cl5158, zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0,
% 53.84/8.27 zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl1186])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(prove_result, conjecture, (( add @ a @ b ) = ( a ))).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( add @ a @ b ) != ( a )),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_result])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain, (((add @ a @ b) != (a))),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 53.84/8.27 thf(zip_derived_cl5226, plain, ($false),
% 53.84/8.27 inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 53.84/8.27 [zip_derived_cl5225, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 53.84/8.27
% 53.84/8.27 % SZS output end Refutation
% 53.84/8.27
% 53.84/8.27
% 53.84/8.27 % Terminating...
% 54.05/8.33 % Runner terminated.
% 54.05/8.34 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------