↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : ROB009-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.u79cjdEs63 true

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:50:38 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.26s 0.70s
% Output   : Refutation 1.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.06  % Problem  : ROB009-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.07  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.u79cjdEs63 true
% 0.06/0.25  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.25  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.25  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.25  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.06/0.25  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.06/0.26  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.26  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.06/0.26  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 12:25:23 EDT 2025
% 0.06/0.26  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.06/0.26  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.06/0.26  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.26  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.06/0.26  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.06/0.26  % Running in FO mode
% 0.10/0.52  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.10/0.52  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.10/0.52  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.67/0.62  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.11/0.65  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.11/0.65  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 1.11/0.65  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 1.11/0.65  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 1.11/0.65  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.11/0.66  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.26/0.70  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 1.26/0.70  % BCE start: 5
% 1.26/0.70  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 1.26/0.70  % PE start: 5
% 1.26/0.70  logic: eq
% 1.26/0.70  % PE eliminated: 0
% 1.26/0.70  % done 8 iterations in 0.039s
% 1.26/0.70  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.26/0.70  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.26/0.70  thf(negate_type, type, negate: $i > $i).
% 1.26/0.70  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 1.26/0.70  thf(add_type, type, add: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.26/0.70  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 1.26/0.70  thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 1.26/0.70  thf(condition, axiom,
% 1.26/0.70    (( negate @ ( add @ a @ ( negate @ ( add @ b @ c ) ) ) ) =
% 1.26/0.70     ( negate @ ( add @ b @ ( negate @ ( add @ a @ c ) ) ) ))).
% 1.26/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 1.26/0.70      (((negate @ (add @ a @ (negate @ (add @ b @ c))))
% 1.26/0.70         = (negate @ (add @ b @ (negate @ (add @ a @ c)))))),
% 1.26/0.70      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condition])).
% 1.26/0.70  thf(robbins_axiom, axiom,
% 1.26/0.70    (( negate @
% 1.26/0.70       ( add @
% 1.26/0.70         ( negate @ ( add @ X @ Y ) ) @ 
% 1.26/0.70         ( negate @ ( add @ X @ ( negate @ Y ) ) ) ) ) =
% 1.26/0.70     ( X ))).
% 1.26/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 1.26/0.70      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.26/0.70         ((negate @ 
% 1.26/0.70           (add @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ X1)) @ 
% 1.26/0.70            (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ X1)))))
% 1.26/0.70           = (X0))),
% 1.26/0.70      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [robbins_axiom])).
% 1.26/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl50, plain,
% 1.26/0.70      (((negate @ 
% 1.26/0.70         (add @ (negate @ (add @ b @ (add @ a @ c))) @ 
% 1.26/0.70          (negate @ (add @ a @ (negate @ (add @ b @ c))))))
% 1.26/0.70         = (b))),
% 1.26/0.70      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 1.26/0.70  thf(associativity_of_add, axiom,
% 1.26/0.70    (( add @ ( add @ X @ Y ) @ Z ) = ( add @ X @ ( add @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 1.26/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 1.26/0.70      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.26/0.70         ((add @ (add @ X0 @ X1) @ X2) = (add @ X0 @ (add @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 1.26/0.70      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_add])).
% 1.26/0.70  thf(commutativity_of_add, axiom, (( add @ X @ Y ) = ( add @ Y @ X ))).
% 1.26/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.26/0.70      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 1.26/0.70      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 1.26/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 1.26/0.70      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.26/0.70         ((add @ X0 @ (add @ X2 @ X1)) = (add @ X2 @ (add @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 1.26/0.70      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.26/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.26/0.70      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 1.26/0.70      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 1.26/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 1.26/0.70      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.26/0.70         ((negate @ 
% 1.26/0.70           (add @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ X1)) @ 
% 1.26/0.70            (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ X1)))))
% 1.26/0.70           = (X0))),
% 1.26/0.70      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [robbins_axiom])).
% 1.26/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl64, plain, (((a) = (b))),
% 1.26/0.70      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 1.26/0.70                [zip_derived_cl50, zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl0, 
% 1.26/0.70                 zip_derived_cl2])).
% 1.26/0.70  thf(prove_result, conjecture, (( a ) = ( b ))).
% 1.26/0.70  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( a ) != ( b )),
% 1.26/0.70    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_result])).
% 1.26/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain, (((a) != (b))),
% 1.26/0.70      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.26/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl65, plain, ($false),
% 1.26/0.70      inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 1.26/0.70                [zip_derived_cl64, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 1.26/0.70  
% 1.26/0.70  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.26/0.70  
% 1.26/0.70  
% 1.26/0.70  % Terminating...
% 1.48/0.76  % Runner terminated.
% 1.48/0.77  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------