↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : ROB011-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.6FRbg95qE2 true

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:50:39 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.57s 0.77s
% Output   : Refutation 0.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.13  % Problem  : ROB011-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.6FRbg95qE2 true
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 12:24:08 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.54/0.65  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.54/0.65  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.54/0.65  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.55/0.71  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.55/0.71  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.55/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.55/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.55/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.55/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.55/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.57/0.77  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.57/0.77  % BCE start: 9
% 0.57/0.77  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.57/0.77  % PE start: 9
% 0.57/0.77  logic: eq
% 0.57/0.77  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.57/0.77  % done 13 iterations in 0.041s
% 0.57/0.77  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.57/0.77  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.57/0.77  thf(negate_type, type, negate: $i > $i).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(multiply_type, type, multiply: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(add_type, type, add: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(one_type, type, one: $i).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(condition, axiom, (( negate @ ( add @ a @ ( negate @ b ) ) ) = ( c ))).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain, (((negate @ (add @ a @ (negate @ b))) = (c))),
% 0.57/0.77      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condition])).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(robbins_axiom, axiom,
% 0.57/0.77    (( negate @
% 0.57/0.77       ( add @
% 0.57/0.77         ( negate @ ( add @ X @ Y ) ) @ 
% 0.57/0.77         ( negate @ ( add @ X @ ( negate @ Y ) ) ) ) ) =
% 0.57/0.77     ( X ))).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.57/0.77      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.77         ((negate @ 
% 0.57/0.77           (add @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ X1)) @ 
% 0.57/0.77            (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ X1)))))
% 0.57/0.77           = (X0))),
% 0.57/0.77      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [robbins_axiom])).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl64, plain,
% 0.57/0.77      (((negate @ (add @ (negate @ (add @ a @ b)) @ c)) = (a))),
% 0.57/0.77      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(commutativity_of_add, axiom, (( add @ X @ Y ) = ( add @ Y @ X ))).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.57/0.77      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.57/0.77      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl78, plain,
% 0.57/0.77      (((negate @ (add @ c @ (negate @ (add @ a @ b)))) = (a))),
% 0.57/0.77      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl64, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.57/0.77      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.77         ((negate @ 
% 0.57/0.77           (add @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ X1)) @ 
% 0.57/0.77            (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ X1)))))
% 0.57/0.77           = (X0))),
% 0.57/0.77      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [robbins_axiom])).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl97, plain,
% 0.57/0.77      (((negate @ (add @ (negate @ (add @ c @ (add @ a @ b))) @ a)) = (c))),
% 0.57/0.77      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl78, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(associativity_of_add, axiom,
% 0.57/0.77    (( add @ ( add @ X @ Y ) @ Z ) = ( add @ X @ ( add @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.57/0.77      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.77         ((add @ (add @ X0 @ X1) @ X2) = (add @ X0 @ (add @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 0.57/0.77      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_add])).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.57/0.77      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.57/0.77      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain,
% 0.57/0.77      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.77         ((add @ X0 @ (add @ X2 @ X1)) = (add @ X2 @ (add @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.57/0.77      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.57/0.77      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.57/0.77      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl99, plain,
% 0.57/0.77      (((negate @ (add @ a @ (negate @ (add @ a @ (add @ b @ c))))) = (c))),
% 0.57/0.77      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.57/0.77                [zip_derived_cl97, zip_derived_cl18, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(prove_base_step, conjecture,
% 0.57/0.77    (( negate @
% 0.57/0.77       ( add @
% 0.57/0.77         a @ ( negate @ ( add @ b @ ( multiply @ one @ ( add @ a @ c ) ) ) ) ) ) =
% 0.57/0.77     ( c ))).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.57/0.77    (( negate @
% 0.57/0.77       ( add @
% 0.57/0.77         a @ ( negate @ ( add @ b @ ( multiply @ one @ ( add @ a @ c ) ) ) ) ) ) !=
% 0.57/0.77     ( c )),
% 0.57/0.77    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_base_step])).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 0.57/0.77      (((negate @ 
% 0.57/0.77         (add @ a @ (negate @ (add @ b @ (multiply @ one @ (add @ a @ c))))))
% 0.57/0.77         != (c))),
% 0.57/0.77      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(one_times_x, axiom, (( multiply @ one @ X ) = ( X ))).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((multiply @ one @ X0) = (X0))),
% 0.57/0.77      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [one_times_x])).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain,
% 0.57/0.77      (((negate @ (add @ a @ (negate @ (add @ b @ (add @ a @ c))))) != (c))),
% 0.57/0.77      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain,
% 0.57/0.77      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.77         ((add @ X0 @ (add @ X2 @ X1)) = (add @ X2 @ (add @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.57/0.77      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.57/0.77      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.57/0.77      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl26, plain,
% 0.57/0.77      (((negate @ (add @ a @ (negate @ (add @ a @ (add @ b @ c))))) != (c))),
% 0.57/0.77      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.57/0.77                [zip_derived_cl17, zip_derived_cl18, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl105, plain, ($false),
% 0.57/0.77      inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 0.57/0.77                [zip_derived_cl99, zip_derived_cl26])).
% 0.57/0.77  
% 0.57/0.77  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.57/0.77  
% 0.57/0.77  
% 0.57/0.77  % Terminating...
% 0.57/0.85  % Runner terminated.
% 1.85/0.86  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------