↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : ROB016-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:55:18 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 246.21s 266.97s
% Output   : Proof 246.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   31 (  20 unt;   0 nHn;  29 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   48 (  34 equ;  19 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(robbins_axiom,axiom,
    negate(add(negate(add(X,Y)),negate(add(X,negate(Y))))) = X,
    file('ROB001-0.ax',robbins_axiom) ).

cnf(condition,hypothesis,
    negate(add(d,e)) = negate(e),
    file('theBenchmark.p',condition) ).

cnf(k_positive,axiom,
    positive_integer(k),
    file('theBenchmark.p',k_positive) ).

cnf(lemma_3_6,axiom,
    ( negate(add(Y,multiply(Vk,add(X,negate(add(X,negate(Y))))))) = negate(Y)
    | ~ positive_integer(Vk)
    | negate(add(negate(Y),negate(add(X,negate(Y))))) != X ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',lemma_3_6) ).

cnf(prove_result,negated_conjecture,
    negate(add(e,multiply(k,add(d,negate(add(d,negate(e))))))) != negate(e),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_result) ).

cnf(equality_1,axiom,
    Eq_x_0 = Eq_x_0,
    theory(equality,[reflexivity]) ).

cnf(equality_2,axiom,
    ( Eq_x_1 = Eq_x_0
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_x_1 ),
    theory(equality,[symmetry]) ).

cnf(equality_3,axiom,
    ( Eq_x_0 = Eq_x_2
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_x_2
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_x_1 ),
    theory(equality,[transitivity]) ).

cnf(equality_4,axiom,
    ( add(Eq_x_0,Eq_x_1) = add(Eq_y_0,Eq_y_1)
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_y_1
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_functions]) ).

cnf(equality_5,axiom,
    ( negate(Eq_x_0) = negate(Eq_y_0)
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_functions]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    negate(add(e,multiply(k,add(d,negate(add(d,negate(e))))))) != negate(e),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[prove_result]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( ~ positive_integer(k)
    | negate(add(negate(e),negate(add(d,negate(e))))) != d
    | negate(add(e,multiply(k,add(d,negate(add(d,negate(e))))))) = negate(e) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[lemma_3_6]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    ( negate(add(negate(e),negate(add(d,negate(e))))) != negate(add(negate(add(d,e)),negate(add(d,negate(e)))))
    | negate(add(negate(add(d,e)),negate(add(d,negate(e))))) != d
    | negate(add(negate(e),negate(add(d,negate(e))))) = d ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[equality_3]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    negate(add(negate(add(d,e)),negate(add(d,negate(e))))) = d,
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:2)],[robbins_axiom]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t4:2]) ).

cnf(t8,plain,
    ( add(negate(e),negate(add(d,negate(e)))) != add(negate(add(d,e)),negate(add(d,negate(e))))
    | negate(add(negate(e),negate(add(d,negate(e))))) = negate(add(negate(add(d,e)),negate(add(d,negate(e))))) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:3)],[equality_5]) ).

cnf(t9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t4:3]) ).

cnf(t10,plain,
    ( negate(add(d,negate(e))) != negate(add(d,negate(e)))
    | negate(e) != negate(add(d,e))
    | add(negate(e),negate(add(d,negate(e)))) = add(negate(add(d,e)),negate(add(d,negate(e)))) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t8:2)],[equality_4]) ).

cnf(t11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t10:1)],[t10:1,t8:2]) ).

cnf(t12,plain,
    ( negate(add(d,e)) != negate(e)
    | negate(e) = negate(add(d,e)) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t10:2)],[equality_2]) ).

cnf(t13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t12:1)],[t12:1,t10:2]) ).

cnf(t14,plain,
    negate(add(d,e)) = negate(e),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t12:2)],[condition]) ).

cnf(t15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t14:1)],[t14:1,t12:2]) ).

cnf(t16,plain,
    ( add(d,negate(e)) != add(d,negate(e))
    | negate(add(d,negate(e))) = negate(add(d,negate(e))) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t10:3)],[equality_5]) ).

cnf(t17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t16:1)],[t16:1,t10:3]) ).

cnf(t18,plain,
    add(d,negate(e)) = add(d,negate(e)),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t16:2)],[equality_1]) ).

cnf(t19,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t18:1)],[t18:1,t16:2]) ).

cnf(t20,plain,
    positive_integer(k),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:3)],[k_positive]) ).

cnf(t21,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t20:1)],[t20:1,t2:3]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : ROB016-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.02  This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN problem
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.34   % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.34   % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.34   % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.34   % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.34   % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/20.82  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/20.82  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.03/20.82  % DateTime : Sat Sep 19 21:01:05 UTC 2026
% 0.03/20.82  % CPUTime  : 
% 246.21/266.97  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 246.21/266.97  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------