↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : ROB016-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:26:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.09s 0.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   23 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   13 (   8   ~;   5   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn   7   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(commutativity_of_add,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : add(VAR_0,VAR_1) = add(VAR_1,VAR_0),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_add) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    add(A,B) = add(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_add]) ).

fof(robbins_axiom,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : negate(add(negate(add(VAR_0,VAR_1)),negate(add(VAR_0,negate(VAR_1))))) = VAR_0,
    file('theBenchmark.p',robbins_axiom) ).

cnf(c_3,plain,
    negate(add(negate(add(A,B)),negate(add(A,negate(B))))) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[robbins_axiom]) ).

fof(condition,axiom,
    negate(add(d,e)) = negate(e),
    file('theBenchmark.p',condition) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    negate(add(d,e)) = negate(e),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[condition]) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    negate(add(e,d)) = negate(e),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_8]) ).

fof(k_positive,axiom,
    positive_integer(k),
    file('theBenchmark.p',k_positive) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    positive_integer(k),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[k_positive]) ).

fof(lemma_3_6,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
      ( negate(add(VAR_0,multiply(VAR_2,add(VAR_1,negate(add(VAR_1,negate(VAR_0))))))) = negate(VAR_0)
      | ~ positive_integer(VAR_2)
      | negate(add(negate(VAR_0),negate(add(VAR_1,negate(VAR_0))))) != VAR_1 ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',lemma_3_6) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    ( negate(add(A,multiply(C,add(B,negate(add(B,negate(A))))))) = negate(A)
    | ~ positive_integer(C)
    | negate(add(negate(A),negate(add(B,negate(A))))) != B ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[lemma_3_6]) ).

fof(prove_result,axiom,
    negate(add(e,multiply(k,add(d,negate(add(d,negate(e))))))) != negate(e),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_result) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    negate(add(e,multiply(k,add(d,negate(add(d,negate(e))))))) != negate(e),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_result]) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    negate(add(negate(add(A,B)),negate(add(B,negate(A))))) = B,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_48,plain,
    ( negate(add(A,multiply(k,add(B,negate(add(B,negate(A))))))) = negate(A)
    | negate(add(negate(A),negate(add(B,negate(A))))) != B ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_11,c_10]) ).

cnf(c_27,plain,
    negate(add(negate(e),negate(add(d,negate(e))))) != d,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_48,c_12]) ).

cnf(c_46,plain,
    negate(add(negate(e),negate(add(d,negate(e))))) = d,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_9,c_15]) ).

cnf(c_47,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_46,c_27]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ROB016-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 06:15:19 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.37  % Process 584418 was started by sandbox2 on n019,
% 0.09/0.37  % Sat Sep 26 06:15:19 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.38  
% 0.09/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.09/0.39  
% 0.09/0.39  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.39  
% 0.09/0.39  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.09/0.39  % Length of proof is 11.
% 0.09/0.39  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.09/0.39  % Maximum clause weight is 28.000.
% 0.09/0.39  % Given clauses 18.
% 0.09/0.39  
% 0.09/0.39  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------