↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : ROB030-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.gCJ8cE6e09 true

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:50:41 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.56s 0.76s
% Output   : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : ROB030-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.gCJ8cE6e09 true
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 12:24:23 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.55/0.65  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.55/0.65  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.55/0.65  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.55/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.76  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.56/0.76  % BCE start: 5
% 0.56/0.76  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.56/0.76  % PE start: 5
% 0.56/0.76  logic: eq
% 0.56/0.76  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.56/0.76  % done 2 iterations in 0.009s
% 0.56/0.76  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.56/0.76  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.56/0.76  thf(negate_type, type, negate: $i > $i).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(add_type, type, add: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(absorbtion, axiom, (( add @ c @ d ) = ( d ))).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, (((add @ c @ d) = (d))),
% 0.56/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [absorbtion])).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(prove_absorption_within_negation, conjecture,
% 0.56/0.76    (( negate @ ( add @ A @ B ) ) = ( negate @ B ))).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.56/0.76    (( negate @ ( add @ A @ B ) ) != ( negate @ B )),
% 0.56/0.76    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_absorption_within_negation])).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.56/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((negate @ (add @ X1 @ X0)) != (negate @ X0))),
% 0.56/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain, (((negate @ d) != (negate @ d))),
% 0.56/0.76      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain, ($false),
% 0.56/0.76      inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7])).
% 0.56/0.76  
% 0.56/0.76  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.56/0.76  
% 0.56/0.76  
% 0.56/0.76  % Terminating...
% 1.60/0.86  % Runner terminated.
% 1.61/0.88  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------