↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SCT075-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 22:10:37 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.78s 0.95s
% Output   : Refutation 0.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   3 unt;   2 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   12 (   3 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   2 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_complete__Lin_1,axiom,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(X,Y,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),v_sko__Arrow__Order__Mirabelle__Xcomplete__Lin__1(X,Y),tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt))
    | X = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_complete__Lin_1) ).

cnf(cls_complete__Lin_0,axiom,
    ( c_in(v_sko__Arrow__Order__Mirabelle__Xcomplete__Lin__1(X,Y),c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_OLin,tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_bool))
    | X = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_complete__Lin_0) ).

cnf(cls_that_0,axiom,
    ( v_thesis____
    | ~ c_in(X,c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_OLin,tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_bool))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_b____,v_a____,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),X,tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_that_0) ).

cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
    v_a____ != v_b____,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(499,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X,c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_OLin,tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_bool))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_b____,v_a____,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),X,tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_that_0,cls_conjecture_0]) ).

cnf(994,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[499,cls_complete__Lin_0,cls_complete__Lin_1]),cls_CHAINED_0]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : SCT075-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Jul  2 08:44:23 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.49  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.50  * 
% 0.22/0.50  * 
% 0.22/0.51  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.22/0.51   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.22/0.51   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.22/0.51   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.22/0.51   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  "."
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-02T08:44:23
% 0.22/0.51  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n008.cluster.edu at 2022-07-02T08:44:23
% 0.48/0.66  WARNING:
% 0.48/0.66     |class_Orderings_Olinorder| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.78/0.95  
% 0.78/0.95  
% 0.78/0.95  #||
% 0.78/0.95  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.78/0.95  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.78/0.95  ||#
% 0.78/0.95  
% 0.78/0.95  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.78/0.95  ;      1881 formulas have been input or derived (from 271 formulas).
% 0.78/0.95  ;       994 (53%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.78/0.95  ;           36 ( 4%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.78/0.95  ;          958 (96%) are still being kept.
% 0.78/0.95  ; 
% 0.78/0.95  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.78/0.95  ;     0.128  29%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.78/0.95  ;     0.010   2%   Assert                       (549 calls)
% 0.78/0.95  ;     0.086  20%   Process new row              (1,672 calls)
% 0.78/0.95  ;     0.032   7%   Resolution                   (540 calls)
% 0.78/0.95  ;     0.011   3%   Paramodulation               (270 calls)
% 0.78/0.95  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (7 calls)
% 0.78/0.95  ;     0.028   6%   Condensing                   (712 calls)
% 0.78/0.95  ;     0.027   6%   Forward subsumption          (712 calls)
% 0.78/0.95  ;     0.013   3%   Backward subsumption         (568 calls)
% 0.78/0.95  ;     0.005   1%   Clause clause subsumption    (693 calls)
% 0.78/0.95  ;     0.035   8%   Forward simplification       (1,671 calls)
% 0.78/0.95  ;     0.008   2%   Backward simplification      (988 calls)
% 0.78/0.95  ;     0.018   4%   Ordering                     (1,845 calls)
% 0.78/0.95  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.78/0.95  ;     0.001   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.78/0.95  ;     0.032   7%   Other
% 0.78/0.95  ;     0.434        Total
% 0.78/0.95  ;     0.436        Real time
% 0.78/0.95  ; 
% 0.78/0.95  ; Term-hash-array has 2,329 terms in all.
% 0.78/0.95  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 557 entries (557 at peak, 568 added, 11 deleted).
% 0.78/0.95  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 2,960 nodes (2,960 at peak, 3,070 added, 110 deleted).
% 0.78/0.95  ;  Retrieved 673 possibly forward subsuming rows in 712 calls.
% 0.78/0.95  ;  Retrieved 304 possibly backward subsumed rows in 568 calls.
% 0.78/0.95  ; Path-index has 2,268 entries (2,268 at peak, 2,367 added, 99 deleted).
% 0.78/0.95  ; Path-index has 11,362 nodes (11,362 at peak, 11,715 added, 353 deleted).
% 0.78/0.95  ; Trie-index has 2,268 entries (2,268 at peak, 2,367 added, 99 deleted).
% 0.78/0.95  ; Trie-index has 13,369 nodes (13,369 at peak, 14,456 added, 1,087 deleted).
% 0.78/0.95  ; Retrieved 2,984 generalization terms in 5,348 calls.
% 0.78/0.95  ; Retrieved 798 instance terms in 460 calls.
% 0.78/0.95  ; Retrieved 32,371 unifiable terms in 1,729 calls.
% 0.78/0.95  ; 
% 0.78/0.95  ; The agenda of rows to process has 1 entry:
% 0.78/0.95  ;     1 with value 13
% 0.78/0.95  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 210 entries:
% 0.78/0.95  ;    21 with value 24             10 with value 35               8 with value 46
% 0.78/0.95  ;    16 with value 25              3 with value 36               5 with value 50
% 0.78/0.95  ;    11 with value 26              7 with value 37               1 with value 51
% 0.78/0.95  ;    12 with value 27              6 with value 38               1 with value 52
% 0.78/0.95  ;     7 with value 28              1 with value 39               1 with value 53
% 0.78/0.95  ;     8 with value 29             10 with value 40               2 with value 54
% 0.78/0.95  ;    17 with value 30              1 with value 41               4 with value 62
% 0.78/0.95  ;     9 with value 31              6 with value 42               1 with value 64
% 0.78/0.95  ;    11 with value 32              5 with value 43               1 with value 68
% 0.78/0.95  ;    11 with value 33              2 with value 44               2 with value 70
% 0.78/0.95  ;     6 with value 34              3 with value 45               1 with value 95
% 0.78/0.95  ; The agenda of rows to give has 478 entries:
% 0.78/0.95  ;     1 with value (4 5)          14 with value (4 22)          13 with value (4 38)
% 0.78/0.95  ;     3 with value (4 6)          35 with value (4 23)           9 with value (4 40)
% 0.78/0.95  ;    13 with value (4 7)          11 with value (4 24)           4 with value (4 42)
% 0.78/0.95  ;     4 with value (4 8)          16 with value (4 25)           3 with value (4 43)
% 0.78/0.95  ;     2 with value (4 9)          25 with value (4 26)           3 with value (4 44)
% 0.78/0.95  ;     5 with value (4 10)         18 with value (4 27)           1 with value (4 45)
% 0.78/0.95  ;     4 with value (4 11)         16 with value (4 28)           2 with value (4 46)
% 0.78/0.95  ;     5 with value (4 12)         10 with value (4 29)           3 with value (4 48)
% 0.78/0.95  ;    12 with value (4 13)         25 with value (4 30)           2 with value (4 49)
% 0.78/0.95  ;    14 with value (4 14)          5 with value (4 31)           1 with value (4 51)
% 0.78/0.95  ;    21 with value (4 15)          9 with value (4 32)           2 with value (4 54)
% 0.78/0.95  ;    14 with value (4 16)          3 with value (4 33)           1 with value (4 55)
% 0.78/0.95  ;    12 with value (4 17)          5 with value (4 34)           2 with value (4 56)
% 0.78/0.95  ;    35 with value (4 18)          5 with value (4 35)           2 with value (4 59)
% 0.78/0.95  ;    29 with value (4 19)         12 with value (4 36)           1 with value (4 63)
% 0.78/0.95  ;    10 with value (4 20)          3 with value (4 37)           1 with value (4 72)
% 0.78/0.95  ;    32 with value (4 21)
% 0.78/0.95  Evaluation took:
% 0.78/0.95    0.437 seconds of real time
% 0.78/0.95    0.410593 seconds of user run time
% 0.78/0.95    0.025954 seconds of system run time
% 0.78/0.95    [Run times include 0.029 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.78/0.95    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.78/0.95    0 page faults and
% 0.78/0.95    26,913,192 bytes consed.
% 0.78/0.95  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.78/0.95  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-02T08:44:23
% 0.78/0.95  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.78/0.95  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------