↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SCT131+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:07:56 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.94s 1.84s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   33 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   28 (  12   ~;  10   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;   8 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (   1 sgn  13   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_0,conjecture,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Product__Type_OPair(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),v_b____),v_b_H____)),hAPP(v_F,v_Q____))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

fof(fact_unanimity__def,axiom,
    ! [X26] :
      ( c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Ounanimity(X26)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_fun(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oindi,tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_HOL_Obool))),X3),c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_OProf))
         => ! [X33,X34] :
              ( ! [X13] : hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Product__Type_OPair(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),X33),X34)),hAPP(X3,X13)))
             => hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Product__Type_OPair(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),X33),X34)),hAPP(X26,X3))) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_unanimity__def) ).

fof(fact__096_B_Bi_O_Ab_A_060_092_060_094bsub_062Q_Ai_092_060_094esub_062_Ab_H_096,axiom,
    ! [X4] : hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Product__Type_OPair(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),v_b____),v_b_H____)),hAPP(v_Q____,X4))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact__096_B_Bi_O_Ab_A_060_092_060_094bsub_062Q_Ai_092_060_094esub_062_Ab_H_096) ).

fof(fact__096Q_A_058_AProf_096,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_fun(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oindi,tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_HOL_Obool))),v_Q____),c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_OProf)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact__096Q_A_058_AProf_096) ).

fof(fact_u,axiom,
    c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Ounanimity(v_F),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_u) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Product__Type_OPair(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),v_b____),v_b_H____)),hAPP(v_F,v_Q____))),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Product__Type_OPair(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),v_b____),v_b_H____)),hAPP(v_F,v_Q____))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X221,X222,X223,X224,X226,X230] :
      ( ( c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Ounanimity(X226)
        | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Product__Type_OPair(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),esk9_1(X226)),esk10_1(X226))),hAPP(X226,esk8_1(X226)))) )
      & ( c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Ounanimity(X226)
        | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Product__Type_OPair(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),esk9_1(X226)),esk10_1(X226))),hAPP(esk8_1(X226),X230))) )
      & ( c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Ounanimity(X226)
        | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_fun(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oindi,tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_HOL_Obool))),esk8_1(X226)),c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_OProf)) )
      & ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Product__Type_OPair(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),X223),X224)),hAPP(X221,X222)))
        | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Product__Type_OPair(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),X223),X224)),hAPP(X222,esk7_4(X221,X222,X223,X224))))
        | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_fun(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oindi,tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_HOL_Obool))),X222),c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_OProf))
        | ~ c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Ounanimity(X221) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_unanimity__def])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X88] : hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Product__Type_OPair(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),v_b____),v_b_H____)),hAPP(v_Q____,X88))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact__096_B_Bi_O_Ab_A_060_092_060_094bsub_062Q_Ai_092_060_094esub_062_Ab_H_096]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Product__Type_OPair(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),v_b____),v_b_H____)),hAPP(v_F,v_Q____))),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Product__Type_OPair(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),X3),X4)),hAPP(X2,esk7_4(X1,X2,X3,X4))))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_fun(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oindi,tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_HOL_Obool))),X2),c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_OProf))
    | ~ c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Ounanimity(X1)
    | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Product__Type_OPair(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),X3),X4)),hAPP(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Product__Type_OPair(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),v_b____),v_b_H____)),hAPP(v_Q____,X1))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_fun(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oindi,tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_HOL_Obool))),v_Q____),c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_OProf)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact__096Q_A_058_AProf_096]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Product__Type_OPair(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),v_b____),v_b_H____)),hAPP(v_F,v_Q____))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Ounanimity(X1)
    | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Product__Type_OPair(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),v_b____),v_b_H____)),hAPP(X1,v_Q____))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Ounanimity(v_F),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_u]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SCT131+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.21/0.45  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.21/0.45  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.21/0.45  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.21/0.45  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.21/0.45  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.21/0.46  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.21/0.46  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.21/0.46  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 04:33:34 UTC 2026
% 0.21/0.46  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.46  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/0.53  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/0.53  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.94/1.84  % Version: 3.5.1
% 3.94/1.84  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 3.94/1.84  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.94/1.84  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.94/1.84  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.94/1.84  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.94/1.84  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 3.94/1.84  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 3141878 completed with status 0
% 3.94/1.84  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 3.94/1.84  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 3.94/1.84  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.94/1.84  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.94/1.84  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 3.94/1.84  % No SInE strategy applied
% 3.94/1.84  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 3.94/1.84  % Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.94/1.84  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 3.94/1.84  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 3.94/1.84  % Starting U----_206b_01_C11_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 3.94/1.84  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 3.94/1.84  % Starting G-E--_208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 3.94/1.84  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 3141886 completed with status 0
% 3.94/1.84  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 3.94/1.84  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 3.94/1.84  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.94/1.84  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.94/1.84  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 3.94/1.84  % No SInE strategy applied
% 3.94/1.84  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 3.94/1.84  % Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.94/1.84  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 3.94/1.84  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 3.94/1.84  % Preprocessing time       : 0.027 s
% 3.94/1.84  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 3.94/1.84  
% 3.94/1.84  % Proof found!
% 3.94/1.84  % SZS status Theorem
% 3.94/1.84  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.94/1.84  % Parsed axioms                        : 535
% 3.94/1.84  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 3.94/1.84  % Initial clauses                      : 819
% 3.94/1.84  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 32
% 3.94/1.84  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 787
% 3.94/1.84  % Processed clauses                    : 1763
% 3.94/1.84  % ...of these trivial                  : 32
% 3.94/1.84  % ...subsumed                          : 201
% 3.94/1.84  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1530
% 3.94/1.84  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 109
% 3.94/1.84  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 3.94/1.84  % Backward-subsumed                    : 16
% 3.94/1.84  % Backward-rewritten                   : 14
% 3.94/1.84  % Generated clauses                    : 17990
% 3.94/1.84  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 16436
% 3.94/1.84  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 3.94/1.84  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 3.94/1.84  % Paramodulations                      : 17880
% 3.94/1.84  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 3.94/1.84  % NegExts                              : 0
% 3.94/1.84  % Equation resolutions                 : 119
% 3.94/1.84  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 3.94/1.84  % Total rewrite steps                  : 3598
% 3.94/1.84  % ...of those cached                   : 2749
% 3.94/1.84  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 3.94/1.84  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 3.94/1.84  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 3.94/1.84  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 3.94/1.84  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 3.94/1.84  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 3.94/1.84  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 3.94/1.84  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 3.94/1.84  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 3.94/1.84  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 3.94/1.84  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 3.94/1.84  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 3.94/1.84  % Current number of processed clauses  : 792
% 3.94/1.84  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 207
% 3.94/1.84  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 8
% 3.94/1.84  %    Negative unit clauses             : 56
% 3.94/1.84  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 521
% 3.94/1.84  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 15806
% 3.94/1.84  % ...number of literals in the above   : 44396
% 3.94/1.84  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 3.94/1.84  % Current number of archived clauses   : 677
% 3.94/1.84  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 117431
% 3.94/1.84  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 62865
% 3.94/1.84  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 150
% 3.94/1.84  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3861
% 3.94/1.84  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 4
% 3.94/1.84  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1560
% 3.94/1.84  % BW rewrite match successes           : 126
% 3.94/1.84  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 3.94/1.84  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 3.94/1.84  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 559781
% 3.94/1.84  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 13188
% 3.94/1.84  
% 3.94/1.84  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.94/1.84  % User time                : 1.140 s
% 3.94/1.84  % System time              : 0.054 s
% 3.94/1.84  % Total time               : 1.194 s
% 3.94/1.84  % Maximum resident set size: 7788 pages
% 3.94/1.84  
% 3.94/1.84  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.94/1.84  % User time                : 5.336 s
% 3.94/1.84  % System time              : 0.271 s
% 3.94/1.84  % Total time               : 5.607 s
% 3.94/1.84  % Maximum resident set size: 5632 pages
% 3.94/1.84  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------