↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SET002-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 14:19:56 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.54s 0.82s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem    : SET002-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 18:04:54 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.54/0.58  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.54/0.82  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.82  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.54/0.82  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.54/0.82  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.54/0.82  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.54/0.82  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.54/0.82  
% 0.54/0.82  % Result      :Theorem 0.190000s
% 0.54/0.82  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.190000s
% 0.54/0.82  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.82  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.82  % File     : SET002-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.54/0.82  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.54/0.82  % Problem  : Idempotency of union
% 0.54/0.82  % Version  : [LS74] axioms.
% 0.54/0.82  % English  :
% 0.54/0.82  
% 0.54/0.82  % Refs     : [LS74]  Lawrence & Starkey (1974), Experimental Tests of Resol
% 0.54/0.82  %          : [WM76]  Wilson & Minker (1976), Resolution, Refinements, and S
% 0.54/0.82  % Source   : [SPRFN]
% 0.54/0.82  % Names    : ls103 [LS74]
% 0.54/0.82  %          : ls103 [WM76]
% 0.54/0.82  
% 0.54/0.82  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.54/0.82  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.0.0, 0.07 v4.1.0, 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.54/0.82  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   14 (   2 unt;   3 nHn;  12 RR)
% 0.54/0.82  %            Number of literals    :   36 (   0 equ;  18 neg)
% 0.54/0.82  %            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
% 0.54/0.82  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.54/0.82  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 0.54/0.82  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
% 0.54/0.82  %            Number of variables   :   34 (   2 sgn)
% 0.54/0.82  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 0.54/0.82  
% 0.54/0.82  % Comments :
% 0.54/0.82  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.82  %----Include the member and subset axioms
% 0.54/0.82  include('Axioms/SET001-0.ax').
% 0.54/0.82  %----Include the member and union axioms
% 0.54/0.82  include('Axioms/SET001-1.ax').
% 0.54/0.82  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.82  cnf(a_union_a_is_aUa,hypothesis,
% 0.54/0.82      union(a,a,aUa) ).
% 0.54/0.82  
% 0.54/0.82  cnf(prove_a_equals_aUa,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.82      ~ equal_sets(aUa,a) ).
% 0.54/0.82  
% 0.54/0.82  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.82  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.82  % Proof found
% 0.54/0.82  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.54/0.82  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.54/0.83  %ClaNum:14(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.54/0.83  %VarNum:90(SingletonVarNum:34)
% 0.54/0.83  %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.54/0.83  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.54/0.83  %SharedTerms:4
% 0.54/0.83  %goalClause: 2
% 0.54/0.83  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.54/0.83  [1]P1(a1,a1,a2)
% 0.54/0.83  [2]~P2(a2,a1)
% 0.54/0.83  [3]~P2(x32,x31)+P3(x31,x32)
% 0.54/0.83  [4]~P2(x41,x42)+P3(x41,x42)
% 0.54/0.83  [5]P3(x51,x52)+P4(f3(x51,x52),x51)
% 0.54/0.83  [8]P3(x81,x82)+~P4(f3(x81,x82),x82)
% 0.54/0.83  [7]~P3(x71,x72)+~P3(x72,x71)+P2(x71,x72)
% 0.54/0.83  [6]~P3(x63,x62)+P4(x61,x62)+~P4(x61,x63)
% 0.54/0.83  [13]P1(x131,x132,x133)+~P4(f4(x131,x132,x133),x133)+~P4(f4(x131,x132,x133),x132)
% 0.54/0.83  [14]P1(x141,x142,x143)+~P4(f4(x141,x142,x143),x143)+~P4(f4(x141,x142,x143),x141)
% 0.54/0.83  [9]P4(x91,x92)+~P1(x94,x93,x92)+~P4(x91,x93)
% 0.54/0.83  [10]P4(x101,x102)+~P1(x103,x104,x102)+~P4(x101,x103)
% 0.54/0.83  [12]P1(x121,x122,x123)+P4(f4(x121,x122,x123),x123)+P4(f4(x121,x122,x123),x122)+P4(f4(x121,x122,x123),x121)
% 0.54/0.83  [11]~P1(x113,x112,x114)+P4(x111,x112)+P4(x111,x113)+~P4(x111,x114)
% 0.54/0.83  %EqnAxiom
% 0.54/0.83  
% 0.54/0.83  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.83  cnf(17,plain,
% 0.54/0.83     (~P3(a2,a1)+P4(f3(a1,a2),a1)),
% 0.54/0.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,5,7])).
% 0.54/0.83  cnf(24,plain,
% 0.54/0.83     (~P3(x241,x242)+P3(x241,x243)+P4(f3(x241,x243),x242)),
% 0.54/0.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,5])).
% 0.54/0.83  cnf(25,plain,
% 0.54/0.83     (P4(f3(a1,a2),a2)+~P3(a2,a1)),
% 0.54/0.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,10,17])).
% 0.54/0.83  cnf(26,plain,
% 0.54/0.83     (P3(a1,a2)+~P3(a2,a1)),
% 0.54/0.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[25,8])).
% 0.54/0.83  cnf(27,plain,
% 0.54/0.83     (~P3(a2,a1)),
% 0.54/0.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,26,7])).
% 0.54/0.83  cnf(49,plain,
% 0.54/0.83     (P4(f3(a2,a1),x491)+~P2(x491,a2)),
% 0.54/0.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[27,3,24])).
% 0.54/0.83  cnf(50,plain,
% 0.54/0.83     (P4(f3(a2,a1),a1)+~P2(a2,a2)),
% 0.54/0.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,49,11])).
% 0.54/0.83  cnf(51,plain,
% 0.54/0.83     (~P3(a2,a2)+P4(f3(a2,a1),a1)),
% 0.54/0.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[50,7])).
% 0.54/0.83  cnf(52,plain,
% 0.54/0.83     (P4(f3(a2,a2),a2)+P4(f3(a2,a1),a1)),
% 0.54/0.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[51,5])).
% 0.54/0.83  cnf(53,plain,
% 0.54/0.83     (P3(a2,a2)+P4(f3(a2,a1),a1)),
% 0.54/0.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[52,8])).
% 0.54/0.83  cnf(54,plain,
% 0.54/0.83     (P4(f3(a2,a1),a1)),
% 0.54/0.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[53,51])).
% 0.54/0.83  cnf(56,plain,
% 0.54/0.83     ($false),
% 0.54/0.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[27,54,8]),
% 0.54/0.83     ['proof']).
% 0.54/0.83  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.54/0.83  % Total time :0.190000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------