↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SET008-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 14:19:57 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 58.81s 58.87s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 58.81s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : SET008-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 15:47:09 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 58.76/58.86  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.76/58.86  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 58.76/58.86  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 58.76/58.86  % Transform   :cnf
% 58.76/58.86  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 58.76/58.86  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 58.76/58.86  
% 58.76/58.86  % Result      :Theorem 58.230000s
% 58.76/58.86  % Output      :CNFRefutation 58.230000s
% 58.76/58.86  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.81/58.87  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.81/58.87  % File     : SET008-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 58.81/58.87  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 58.81/58.87  % Problem  : (X \ Y) ^ Y = the empty set
% 58.81/58.87  % Version  : [LS74] axioms.
% 58.81/58.87  % English  : The difference of two sets contains no members of the
% 58.81/58.87  %            subtracted set.
% 58.81/58.87  
% 58.81/58.87  % Refs     : [LS74]  Lawrence & Starkey (1974), Experimental Tests of Resol
% 58.81/58.87  %          : [WM76]  Wilson & Minker (1976), Resolution, Refinements, and S
% 58.81/58.87  % Source   : [SPRFN]
% 58.81/58.87  % Names    : ls115 [LS74]
% 58.81/58.87  %          : ls115 [WM76]
% 58.81/58.87  
% 58.81/58.87  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 58.81/58.87  % Rating   : 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.12 v6.3.0, 0.00 v2.2.1, 0.25 v2.1.0, 0.00 v2.0.0
% 58.81/58.87  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   21 (   3 unt;   7 nHn;  17 RR)
% 58.81/58.87  %            Number of literals    :   57 (   0 equ;  29 neg)
% 58.81/58.87  %            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
% 58.81/58.87  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 58.81/58.87  %            Number of predicates  :    5 (   5 usr;   0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 58.81/58.87  %            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
% 58.81/58.87  %            Number of variables   :   56 (   5 sgn)
% 58.81/58.87  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 58.81/58.87  
% 58.81/58.87  % Comments :
% 58.81/58.87  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.81/58.87  %----Include the member and subset axioms
% 58.81/58.87  include('Axioms/SET001-0.ax').
% 58.81/58.87  %----Include the member and intersection axioms
% 58.81/58.87  include('Axioms/SET001-2.ax').
% 58.81/58.87  %----Include the member and difference axioms
% 58.81/58.87  include('Axioms/SET001-3.ax').
% 58.81/58.87  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.81/58.87  cnf(b_minus_a,hypothesis,
% 58.81/58.87      difference(b,a,bDa) ).
% 58.81/58.87  
% 58.81/58.87  cnf(a_intersection_bDa,negated_conjecture,
% 58.81/58.87      ~ intersection(a,bDa,aI_bDa) ).
% 58.81/58.87  
% 58.81/58.87  cnf(prove_aI_bDa_is_empty,negated_conjecture,
% 58.81/58.87      ~ member(A,aI_bDa) ).
% 58.81/58.87  
% 58.81/58.87  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.81/58.87  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.81/58.87  % Proof found
% 58.81/58.87  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 58.81/58.87  % SZS output start Proof
% 58.81/58.88  %ClaNum:21(EqnAxiom:0)
% 58.81/58.88  %VarNum:151(SingletonVarNum:56)
% 58.81/58.88  %MaxLitNum:4
% 58.81/58.88  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 58.81/58.88  %SharedTerms:6
% 58.81/58.88  %goalClause: 2 3
% 58.81/58.88  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 58.81/58.88  [1]P1(a1,a2,a4)
% 58.81/58.88  [3]~P3(a2,a4,a3)
% 58.81/58.88  [2]~P2(x21,a3)
% 58.81/58.88  [4]~P4(x42,x41)+P5(x41,x42)
% 58.81/58.88  [5]~P4(x51,x52)+P5(x51,x52)
% 58.81/58.88  [6]P5(x61,x62)+P2(f5(x61,x62),x61)
% 58.81/58.88  [9]P5(x91,x92)+~P2(f5(x91,x92),x92)
% 58.81/58.88  [8]~P5(x81,x82)+~P5(x82,x81)+P4(x81,x82)
% 58.81/58.88  [7]~P5(x73,x72)+P2(x71,x72)+~P2(x71,x73)
% 58.81/58.88  [16]P3(x161,x162,x163)+P2(f6(x161,x162,x163),x163)+P2(f6(x161,x162,x163),x162)
% 58.81/58.88  [17]P3(x171,x172,x173)+P2(f6(x171,x172,x173),x173)+P2(f6(x171,x172,x173),x171)
% 58.81/58.88  [18]P1(x181,x182,x183)+P2(f7(x181,x182,x183),x183)+P2(f7(x181,x182,x183),x181)
% 58.81/58.88  [19]P1(x191,x192,x193)+P2(f7(x191,x192,x193),x193)+~P2(f7(x191,x192,x193),x192)
% 58.81/58.88  [10]P2(x101,x102)+~P3(x104,x102,x103)+~P2(x101,x103)
% 58.81/58.88  [11]P2(x111,x112)+~P3(x112,x114,x113)+~P2(x111,x113)
% 58.81/58.88  [12]P2(x121,x122)+~P1(x122,x124,x123)+~P2(x121,x123)
% 58.81/58.88  [13]~P2(x131,x132)+~P1(x134,x133,x132)+~P2(x131,x133)
% 58.81/58.88  [20]P1(x201,x202,x203)+P2(f7(x201,x202,x203),x202)+~P2(f7(x201,x202,x203),x203)+~P2(f7(x201,x202,x203),x201)
% 58.81/58.88  [21]P3(x211,x212,x213)+~P2(f6(x211,x212,x213),x213)+~P2(f6(x211,x212,x213),x212)+~P2(f6(x211,x212,x213),x211)
% 58.81/58.88  [14]~P1(x144,x143,x142)+P2(x141,x142)+P2(x141,x143)+~P2(x141,x144)
% 58.81/58.88  [15]~P3(x154,x153,x152)+P2(x151,x152)+~P2(x151,x153)+~P2(x151,x154)
% 58.81/58.88  %EqnAxiom
% 58.81/58.88  
% 58.81/58.88  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.81/58.89  cnf(22,plain,
% 58.81/58.89     (P5(a3,x221)),
% 58.81/58.89     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,6])).
% 58.81/58.89  cnf(500,plain,
% 58.81/58.89     (P2(f6(a2,a4,a3),a4)),
% 58.81/58.89     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,22,2,16,7])).
% 58.81/58.89  cnf(519,plain,
% 58.81/58.89     (P2(f6(a2,a4,a3),a2)),
% 58.81/58.89     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,22,2,17,7])).
% 58.81/58.89  cnf(12927,plain,
% 58.81/58.89     ($false),
% 58.81/58.89     inference(scs_inference,[],[519,500,1,13]),
% 58.81/58.89     ['proof']).
% 58.81/58.90  % SZS output end Proof
% 58.81/58.90  % Total time :58.230000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------