↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : SET014+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:55:54 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.35s 0.61s
% Output   : Proof 0.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   41 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  110 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  109 (  40   ~;  36   |;  28   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   62 (   0 sgn  40   !;  12   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(union_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C,D] :
      ( member(D,union(B,C))
    <=> ( member(D,C)
        | member(D,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',union_defn) ).

fof(subset_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( subset(B,C)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( member(D,B)
         => member(D,C) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).

fof(prove_union_subset,conjecture,
    ! [B,C,D] :
      ( ( subset(D,C)
        & subset(B,C) )
     => subset(union(B,D),C) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_union_subset) ).

fof(f_1_1,plain,
    ! [B,C,D] :
      ( ( member(D,union(B,C))
        | ( ~ member(D,C)
          & ~ member(D,B) ) )
      & ( member(D,C)
        | member(D,B)
        | ~ member(D,union(B,C)) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[union_defn]) ).

fof(f_1_2,plain,
    ! [U_2,U_1,U_0] :
      ( ( member(U_0,union(U_2,U_1))
        | ( ~ member(U_0,U_1)
          & ~ member(U_0,U_2) ) )
      & ( member(U_0,U_1)
        | member(U_0,U_2)
        | ~ member(U_0,union(U_2,U_1)) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_1_1]) ).

fof(f_1_3,plain,
    ( ! [U_8,U_6,U_4] :
        ( member(U_4,union(U_8,U_6))
        | ( ~ member(U_4,U_6)
          & ~ member(U_4,U_8) ) )
    & ! [U_7,U_5,U_3] :
        ( member(U_3,U_5)
        | member(U_3,U_7)
        | ~ member(U_3,union(U_7,U_5)) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[f_1_2]) ).

cnf(f_1_4,plain,
    ( member(U_3,U_5)
    | member(U_3,U_7)
    | ~ member(U_3,union(U_7,U_5)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_3]) ).

fof(f_2_1,plain,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( ( subset(B,C)
        | ? [D] :
            ( ~ member(D,C)
            & member(D,B) ) )
      & ( ! [D] :
            ( member(D,C)
            | ~ member(D,B) )
        | ~ subset(B,C) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset_defn]) ).

fof(f_2_2,plain,
    ! [U_12,U_11] :
      ( ( subset(U_12,U_11)
        | ? [U_10] :
            ( ~ member(U_10,U_11)
            & member(U_10,U_12) ) )
      & ( ! [U_9] :
            ( member(U_9,U_11)
            | ~ member(U_9,U_12) )
        | ~ subset(U_12,U_11) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_2_1]) ).

fof(f_2_3,plain,
    ( ! [U_16,U_14] :
        ( subset(U_16,U_14)
        | ? [U_10] :
            ( ~ member(U_10,U_14)
            & member(U_10,U_16) ) )
    & ! [U_15,U_13] :
        ( ! [U_9] :
            ( member(U_9,U_13)
            | ~ member(U_9,U_15) )
        | ~ subset(U_15,U_13) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[f_2_2]) ).

fof(f_2_4,plain,
    ( ! [U_16,U_14] :
        ( subset(U_16,U_14)
        | ( ~ member(sK1(U_16,U_14),U_14)
          & member(sK1(U_16,U_14),U_16) ) )
    & ! [U_15,U_13] :
        ( ! [U_9] :
            ( member(U_9,U_13)
            | ~ member(U_9,U_15) )
        | ~ subset(U_15,U_13) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(U_10,sK1(U_16,U_14))],[f_2_3]) ).

cnf(f_2_5,plain,
    ( member(U_9,U_13)
    | ~ member(U_9,U_15)
    | ~ subset(U_15,U_13) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_2_4]) ).

cnf(f_2_6,plain,
    ( member(sK1(U_16,U_14),U_16)
    | subset(U_16,U_14) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_2_4]) ).

cnf(f_2_7,plain,
    ( ~ member(sK1(U_16,U_14),U_14)
    | subset(U_16,U_14) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_2_4]) ).

fof(f_6_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B,C,D] :
        ( ( subset(D,C)
          & subset(B,C) )
       => subset(union(B,D),C) ),
    inference(negate,[status(cth)],[prove_union_subset]) ).

fof(f_6_2,negated_conjecture,
    ? [B,C,D] :
      ( ~ subset(union(B,D),C)
      & subset(D,C)
      & subset(B,C) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[f_6_1]) ).

fof(f_6_3,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_34,U_33,U_32] :
      ( ~ subset(union(U_34,U_32),U_33)
      & subset(U_32,U_33)
      & subset(U_34,U_33) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_6_2]) ).

fof(f_6_4,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_33,U_32] :
      ( ~ subset(union(sK4,U_32),U_33)
      & subset(U_32,U_33)
      & subset(sK4,U_33) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4]),skolemize(U_34,sK4)],[f_6_3]) ).

fof(f_6_5,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_32] :
      ( ~ subset(union(sK4,U_32),sK5)
      & subset(U_32,sK5)
      & subset(sK4,sK5) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK5]),skolemize(U_33,sK5)],[f_6_4]) ).

fof(f_6_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(union(sK4,sK6),sK5)
    & subset(sK6,sK5)
    & subset(sK4,sK5) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK6]),skolemize(U_32,sK6)],[f_6_5]) ).

fof(f_6_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(union(sK4,sK6),sK5)
    & subset(sK6,sK5)
    & subset(sK4,sK5) ),
    inference(definitional_conversion,[status(esa)],[f_6_6]) ).

cnf(f_6_8,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK4,sK5),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_6_7]) ).

cnf(f_6_9,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK6,sK5),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_6_7]) ).

cnf(f_6_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(union(sK4,sK6),sK5),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_6_7]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    ~ subset(union(sK4,sK6),sK5),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[f_6_10]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( ~ member(sK1(union(sK4,sK6),sK5),sK5)
    | subset(union(sK4,sK6),sK5) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[f_2_7]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    ( ~ member(sK1(union(sK4,sK6),sK5),sK6)
    | ~ subset(sK6,sK5)
    | member(sK1(union(sK4,sK6),sK5),sK5) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[f_2_5]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    subset(sK6,sK5),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:2)],[f_6_9]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t4:2]) ).

cnf(t8,plain,
    ( member(sK1(union(sK4,sK6),sK5),sK4)
    | ~ member(sK1(union(sK4,sK6),sK5),union(sK4,sK6))
    | member(sK1(union(sK4,sK6),sK5),sK6) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:3)],[f_1_4]) ).

cnf(t9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t4:3]) ).

cnf(t10,plain,
    ( subset(union(sK4,sK6),sK5)
    | member(sK1(union(sK4,sK6),sK5),union(sK4,sK6)) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t8:2)],[f_2_6]) ).

cnf(t11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t10:1)],[t10:1,t8:2]) ).

cnf(t12,plain,
    $false,
    inference(reduction,[status(thm),parent(t10:2)],[t10:2,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t13,plain,
    ( member(sK1(union(sK4,sK6),sK5),sK5)
    | ~ subset(sK4,sK5)
    | ~ member(sK1(union(sK4,sK6),sK5),sK4) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t8:3)],[f_2_5]) ).

cnf(t14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t13:1)],[t13:1,t8:3]) ).

cnf(t15,plain,
    subset(sK4,sK5),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t13:2)],[f_6_8]) ).

cnf(t16,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t15:1)],[t15:1,t13:2]) ).

cnf(t17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(reduction,[status(thm),parent(t13:3)],[t13:3,t2:2]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET014+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 19 21:24:19 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.35/0.61  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.35/0.61  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------