↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SET015-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:22:33 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.45s 1.69s
% Output   : Refutation 1.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SET015-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 10:05:53 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.45/1.69  
% 1.45/1.69  SPASS V 3.9 
% 1.45/1.69  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 1.45/1.69  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.45/1.69  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 1.45/1.69  SPASS derived 4167 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 3605 clauses.
% 1.45/1.69  SPASS allocated 69785 KBytes.
% 1.45/1.69  SPASS spent	0:00:01.27 on the problem.
% 1.45/1.69  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 1.45/1.69  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 1.45/1.69  		0:00:00.06 for inferences.
% 1.45/1.69  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 1.45/1.69  		0:00:01.12 for the reduction.
% 1.45/1.69  
% 1.45/1.69  
% 1.45/1.69  Here is a proof with depth 6, length 38 :
% 1.45/1.69  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.45/1.69  1[0:Inp] ||  -> equal_sets(union(as,bs),cs)*l.
% 1.45/1.69  2[0:Inp] ||  -> equal_sets(union(bs,as),ds)*l.
% 1.45/1.69  3[0:Inp] || equal_sets(cs,ds)*l -> .
% 1.45/1.69  5[0:Inp] || subset(u,v)*+ member(w,u)* -> member(w,v)*.
% 1.45/1.69  6[0:Inp] ||  -> subset(u,v) member(member_of_1_not_of_2(u,v),u)*.
% 1.45/1.69  7[0:Inp] || member(member_of_1_not_of_2(u,v),v)* -> subset(u,v).
% 1.45/1.69  10[0:Inp] || member(u,v) -> member(u,union(v,w))*.
% 1.45/1.69  11[0:Inp] || member(u,v) -> member(u,union(w,v))*.
% 1.45/1.69  12[0:Inp] || member(u,union(v,w))* -> member(u,w) member(u,v).
% 1.45/1.69  17[0:Inp] || equal_sets(u,v) -> subset(v,u)*.
% 1.45/1.69  18[0:Inp] || subset(u,v)*+ subset(v,u)* -> equal_sets(u,v).
% 1.45/1.69  20[0:Inp] || equal_sets(u,v)* -> equal_sets(v,u).
% 1.45/1.69  26[0:Res:18.2,3.0] || subset(cs,ds)* subset(ds,cs) -> .
% 1.45/1.69  59[0:Res:17.1,5.0] || equal_sets(u,v)*+ member(w,v)* -> member(w,u)*.
% 1.45/1.69  164[0:Res:2.0,20.0] ||  -> equal_sets(ds,union(bs,as))*r.
% 1.45/1.69  165[0:Res:1.0,20.0] ||  -> equal_sets(cs,union(as,bs))*r.
% 1.45/1.69  245[0:Res:2.0,59.0] || member(u,ds) -> member(u,union(bs,as))*.
% 1.45/1.69  246[0:Res:1.0,59.0] || member(u,cs) -> member(u,union(as,bs))*.
% 1.45/1.69  250[0:Res:164.0,59.0] || member(u,union(bs,as))* -> member(u,ds).
% 1.45/1.69  251[0:Res:165.0,59.0] || member(u,union(as,bs))* -> member(u,cs).
% 1.45/1.69  267[0:Res:245.1,12.0] || member(u,ds) -> member(u,as)* member(u,bs).
% 1.45/1.69  273[0:Res:246.1,12.0] || member(u,cs) -> member(u,bs) member(u,as)*.
% 1.45/1.69  298[0:Res:11.1,250.0] || member(u,as)* -> member(u,ds).
% 1.45/1.69  299[0:Res:10.1,250.0] || member(u,bs)* -> member(u,ds).
% 1.45/1.69  407[0:Res:11.1,251.0] || member(u,bs)* -> member(u,cs).
% 1.45/1.69  408[0:Res:10.1,251.0] || member(u,as)* -> member(u,cs).
% 1.45/1.69  4632[0:Res:267.1,408.0] || member(u,ds) -> member(u,bs)* member(u,cs).
% 1.45/1.69  4662[0:MRR:4632.1,407.0] || member(u,ds) -> member(u,cs)*.
% 1.45/1.69  4719[0:Res:273.2,298.0] || member(u,cs) -> member(u,bs)* member(u,ds).
% 1.45/1.69  4748[0:MRR:4719.1,299.0] || member(u,cs)* -> member(u,ds).
% 1.45/1.69  4749[0:Res:4662.1,7.0] || member(member_of_1_not_of_2(u,cs),ds)* -> subset(u,cs).
% 1.45/1.69  4786[0:Res:6.1,4748.0] ||  -> subset(cs,u) member(member_of_1_not_of_2(cs,u),ds)*.
% 1.45/1.69  4949[0:Res:4786.1,7.0] ||  -> subset(cs,ds)* subset(cs,ds)*.
% 1.45/1.69  4965[0:Obv:4949.0] ||  -> subset(cs,ds)*.
% 1.45/1.69  4966[0:MRR:26.0,4965.0] || subset(ds,cs)* -> .
% 1.45/1.69  5122[0:Res:6.1,4749.0] ||  -> subset(ds,cs)* subset(ds,cs)*.
% 1.45/1.69  5158[0:Obv:5122.0] ||  -> subset(ds,cs)*.
% 1.45/1.69  5159[0:MRR:5158.0,4966.0] ||  -> .
% 1.45/1.69  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.45/1.69  Formulae used in the proof : a_union_b_is_c b_union_a_is_d prove_c_equals_d membership_in_subsets subsets_axiom1 subsets_axiom2 member_of_set1_is_member_of_union member_of_set2_is_member_of_union member_of_union_is_member_of_one_set set_equal_sets_are_subsets2 subsets_are_set_equal_sets symmetry_for_set_equal
% 1.45/1.69  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------