↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SET015-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:13:04 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.11s 0.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   53 (  12 unt;  13 nHn;  42 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  118 (  15 equ;  60 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   87 (  11 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(complement1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',complement1) ).

cnf(complement2,axiom,
    ( ~ little_set(X1)
    | member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',complement2) ).

cnf(union,axiom,
    union(X1,X2) = complement(intersection(complement(X1),complement(X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',union) ).

cnf(intersection3,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intersection3) ).

cnf(intersection1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intersection1) ).

cnf(intersection2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intersection2) ).

cnf(b_union_a_is_d,hypothesis,
    union(bs,as) = ds,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_union_a_is_d) ).

cnf(a2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | little_set(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a2) ).

cnf(a_union_b_is_c,hypothesis,
    union(as,bs) = cs,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_union_b_is_c) ).

cnf(extensionality2,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | member(f1(X1,X2),X2)
    | member(f1(X1,X2),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',extensionality2) ).

cnf(prove_c_equals_d,negated_conjecture,
    cs != ds,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_c_equals_d) ).

cnf(extensionality3,axiom,
    ( ~ member(f1(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ member(f1(X1,X2),X1)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',extensionality3) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement1]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ little_set(X1)
    | member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement2]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    union(X1,X2) = complement(intersection(complement(X1),complement(X2))),
    union ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection3]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection1]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ little_set(X1)
    | member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,union(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(complement(X2),complement(X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection2]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ little_set(X1)
    | member(X1,union(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,intersection(complement(X2),complement(X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,complement(X2))
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X3))
    | ~ member(X1,union(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
    union(bs,as) = ds,
    b_union_a_is_d ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | little_set(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[a2]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    c_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ little_set(X1)
    | member(X1,complement(X2))
    | member(X1,union(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
    union(as,bs) = cs,
    a_union_b_is_c ).

cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
    ( ~ member(X1,ds)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(bs))
    | ~ member(X1,complement(as)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | little_set(X1) ),
    c_0_26 ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ little_set(X1)
    | member(X1,complement(X3))
    | member(X1,union(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,hypothesis,
    ( ~ little_set(X1)
    | member(X1,cs)
    | member(X1,complement(as)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,hypothesis,
    ( ~ member(X1,ds)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(bs))
    | member(X1,as) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_18]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,hypothesis,
    ( ~ little_set(X1)
    | member(X1,cs)
    | member(X1,complement(bs)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,hypothesis,
    ( ~ member(X1,as)
    | member(X1,cs) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_33]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,hypothesis,
    ( ~ member(X1,ds)
    | member(X1,cs) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_31]),c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | member(f1(X1,X2),X2)
    | member(f1(X1,X2),X1) ),
    extensionality2 ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    cs != ds,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_c_equals_d]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( ~ member(f1(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ member(f1(X1,X2),X1)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[extensionality3]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,hypothesis,
    ( member(f1(ds,X1),X1)
    | member(f1(ds,X1),cs)
    | ds = X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    cs != ds,
    c_0_39 ).

cnf(c_0_43,hypothesis,
    ( ~ member(X1,cs)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(as))
    | ~ member(X1,complement(bs)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,hypothesis,
    ( ~ little_set(X1)
    | member(X1,ds)
    | member(X1,complement(as)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ( ~ member(f1(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ member(f1(X1,X2),X1)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    c_0_40 ).

cnf(c_0_46,hypothesis,
    member(f1(ds,cs),cs),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]),c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,hypothesis,
    ( ~ member(X1,cs)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(bs))
    | member(X1,as) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_18]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,hypothesis,
    ( ~ little_set(X1)
    | member(X1,ds)
    | member(X1,complement(bs)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,hypothesis,
    ( ~ member(X1,as)
    | member(X1,ds) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_44]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,hypothesis,
    ~ member(f1(ds,cs),ds),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]),c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,hypothesis,
    ( ~ member(X1,cs)
    | member(X1,ds) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]),c_0_31]),c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]),c_0_46])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET015-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 04:42:42 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.45  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % sh5l with pid 2021371 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Result found by sh5l
% 0.11/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.11/0.45  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.11/0.45  % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2021374 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.11/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.11/0.45  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.11/0.45  % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.45  
% 0.11/0.45  % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.45  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.11/0.45  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.45  % Parsed axioms                        : 15
% 0.11/0.45  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1
% 0.11/0.45  % Initial clauses                      : 14
% 0.11/0.45  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 14
% 0.11/0.45  % Processed clauses                    : 103
% 0.11/0.45  % ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.11/0.45  % ...subsumed                          : 34
% 0.11/0.45  % ...remaining for further processing  : 68
% 0.11/0.45  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Generated clauses                    : 281
% 0.11/0.45  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 244
% 0.11/0.45  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 12
% 0.11/0.45  % Paramodulations                      : 271
% 0.11/0.45  % Factorizations                       : 10
% 0.11/0.45  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Total rewrite steps                  : 31
% 0.11/0.45  % ...of those cached                   : 20
% 0.11/0.45  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  % Current number of processed clauses  : 68
% 0.11/0.45  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 7
% 0.11/0.45  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.11/0.45  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 59
% 0.11/0.45  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 153
% 0.11/0.45  % ...number of literals in the above   : 506
% 0.11/0.45  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 675
% 0.11/0.45  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 597
% 0.11/0.45  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 46
% 0.11/0.45  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21
% 0.11/0.45  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 4307
% 0.11/0.45  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 22
% 0.11/0.45  
% 0.11/0.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45  % User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.11/0.45  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.11/0.45  % Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.11/0.45  % Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 0.11/0.45  
% 0.11/0.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45  % User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.11/0.45  % System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.11/0.45  % Total time               : 0.018 s
% 0.11/0.45  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.11/0.45  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------