↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET017+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:35:19 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 16.94s 2.91s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 16.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  17 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   51 (  25 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   38 (  15   ~;   9   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   5 sgn   9   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(unordered_pair_defn,axiom,
    ! [U,X,Y] :
      ( member(U,unordered_pair(X,Y))
    <=> ( ( U = Y
          | U = X )
        & member(U,universal_class) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',unordered_pair_defn) ).

fof(left_cancellation,conjecture,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( ( unordered_pair(X,Y) = unordered_pair(X,Z)
        & member(Z,universal_class)
        & member(Y,universal_class) )
     => Y = Z ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',left_cancellation) ).

fof(left_cancellation_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X,Y,Z] :
        ( ( unordered_pair(X,Y) = unordered_pair(X,Z)
          & member(Z,universal_class)
          & member(Y,universal_class) )
       => Y = Z ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[left_cancellation]) ).

fof(nnf_42,plain,
    ? [X,Y,Z] :
      ( Z != Y
      & unordered_pair(X,Z) = unordered_pair(X,Y)
      & member(Z,universal_class)
      & member(Y,universal_class) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[left_cancellation_neg]) ).

fof(sk_left_cancellation_neg,plain,
    ( sK0 != sK1
    & unordered_pair(sK2,sK0) = unordered_pair(sK2,sK1)
    & member(sK0,universal_class)
    & member(sK1,universal_class) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK0,sK2]),skolemize(X,sK2),skolemize(Y,sK1),skolemize(Z,sK0)],[nnf_42]) ).

cnf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
    sK0 != sK1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_left_cancellation_neg]) ).

cnf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(sK2,sK0) = unordered_pair(sK2,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_left_cancellation_neg]) ).

cnf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK0,universal_class),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_left_cancellation_neg]) ).

cnf(c_67,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK1,universal_class),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_left_cancellation_neg]) ).

cnf(c_132,plain,
    ( A != C
    | ~ member(A,universal_class)
    | member(A,unordered_pair(B,C)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair_defn]) ).

cnf(c_134,plain,
    ( A = C
    | A = B
    | ~ member(A,unordered_pair(B,C)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair_defn]) ).

cnf(c_325,plain,
    ( sK1 != B
    | member(sK1,unordered_pair(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_132,c_67]) ).

cnf(c_326,plain,
    ( sK0 != B
    | member(sK0,unordered_pair(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_132,c_66]) ).

cnf(c_9157,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 != sK0,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_64]) ).

cnf(c_9158,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK1 = A
    | ~ member(sK1,unordered_pair(sK0,A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_134,c_9157]) ).

cnf(c_9159,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 != sK0,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_64]) ).

cnf(c_344,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(sK1,unordered_pair(sK0,sK0)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_9158,c_9159]) ).

cnf(c_7218,plain,
    member(sK1,unordered_pair(A,sK1)),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_325]) ).

cnf(c_7378,plain,
    member(sK0,unordered_pair(A,sK0)),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_326]) ).

cnf(c_7408,plain,
    member(sK0,unordered_pair(sK2,sK1)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_7378]) ).

cnf(c_9160,plain,
    ( sK0 = sK1
    | sK0 = sK2 ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_7408,c_134]) ).

cnf(c_7418,negated_conjecture,
    sK0 = sK2,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_9160]) ).

cnf(c_9161,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(sK1,unordered_pair(sK2,sK0)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_7418,c_344]) ).

cnf(c_7935,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(sK1,unordered_pair(sK2,sK2)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_7418,c_9161]) ).

cnf(c_9162,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(sK2,sK2) = unordered_pair(sK2,sK1),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_7418,c_65]) ).

cnf(c_7954,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(sK2,sK1) = unordered_pair(sK2,sK2),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_9162]) ).

cnf(c_9163,plain,
    member(sK1,unordered_pair(sK2,sK2)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_7954,c_7218]) ).

cnf(c_9156,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_7935,c_9163]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SET017+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.43  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.43  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 06:51:03 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.43  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.17/0.43  % Process 2425230 was started by sandbox on n014,
% 0.17/0.43  % Sat Sep 26 06:51:03 2026
% 0.17/0.43  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.17/0.46  
% 0.17/0.46  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 16.94/2.91  
% 16.94/2.91  % given #500 (F,wt=16): 1914 -member(f4(c1,universal_class),complement(universal_class)).  [resolve(932,a,114,b)].
% 16.94/2.91  
% 16.94/2.91  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 16.94/2.91  
% 16.94/2.91  % Proof 1 at 1.82 (+ 0.58) seconds.
% 16.94/2.91  % Length of proof is 18.
% 16.94/2.91  % Level of proof is 7.
% 16.94/2.91  % Maximum clause weight is 21.000.
% 16.94/2.91  % Given clauses 712.
% 16.94/2.91  
% 16.94/2.91  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------