↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET017-7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:35:20 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 10.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  24 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   48 (  25 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   26 (  13   ~;  13   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   9 sgn  15   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_left_cancellation_3,axiom,
    y != z,
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_left_cancellation_3) ).

cnf(c_33,plain,
    y != z,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_left_cancellation_3]) ).

cnf(c_34,plain,
    z != y,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_33]) ).

fof(prove_left_cancellation_2,axiom,
    member(ordered_pair(y,z),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_left_cancellation_2) ).

cnf(c_35,plain,
    member(ordered_pair(y,z),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_left_cancellation_2]) ).

fof(prove_left_cancellation_1,axiom,
    unordered_pair(x,y) = unordered_pair(x,z),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_left_cancellation_1) ).

cnf(c_36,plain,
    unordered_pair(x,y) = unordered_pair(x,z),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_left_cancellation_1]) ).

cnf(c_37,plain,
    unordered_pair(x,z) = unordered_pair(x,y),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_36]) ).

fof(commutativity_of_unordered_pair,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : unordered_pair(VAR_0,VAR_1) = unordered_pair(VAR_1,VAR_0),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_unordered_pair) ).

cnf(c_43,plain,
    unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_unordered_pair]) ).

fof(corollary_2_to_cartesian_product,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
      ( member(VAR_1,universal_class)
      | ~ member(ordered_pair(VAR_0,VAR_1),cross_product(VAR_2,VAR_3)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',corollary_2_to_cartesian_product) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    ( member(B,universal_class)
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(A,B),cross_product(C,D)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[corollary_2_to_cartesian_product]) ).

fof(corollary_1_to_cartesian_product,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
      ( member(VAR_0,universal_class)
      | ~ member(ordered_pair(VAR_0,VAR_1),cross_product(VAR_2,VAR_3)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',corollary_1_to_cartesian_product) ).

cnf(c_59,plain,
    ( member(A,universal_class)
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(A,B),cross_product(C,D)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[corollary_1_to_cartesian_product]) ).

fof(unordered_pair2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( member(VAR_0,unordered_pair(VAR_0,VAR_1))
      | ~ member(VAR_0,universal_class) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',unordered_pair2) ).

cnf(c_139,plain,
    ( member(A,unordered_pair(A,B))
    | ~ member(A,universal_class) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair2]) ).

fof(unordered_pair_member,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
      ( VAR_0 = VAR_2
      | VAR_0 = VAR_1
      | ~ member(VAR_0,unordered_pair(VAR_1,VAR_2)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',unordered_pair_member) ).

cnf(c_140,plain,
    ( A = C
    | A = B
    | ~ member(A,unordered_pair(B,C)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair_member]) ).

cnf(c_174,plain,
    unordered_pair(z,x) = unordered_pair(x,y),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_43,c_37]) ).

cnf(c_1298,plain,
    unordered_pair(x,z) = unordered_pair(y,x),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_43,c_37]) ).

cnf(c_175,plain,
    unordered_pair(y,x) = unordered_pair(x,z),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_1298]) ).

cnf(c_196,plain,
    member(z,universal_class),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_35]) ).

cnf(c_197,plain,
    member(y,universal_class),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_35]) ).

cnf(c_604,plain,
    member(z,unordered_pair(z,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_196,c_139]) ).

cnf(c_619,plain,
    member(y,unordered_pair(y,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_197,c_139]) ).

cnf(c_918,plain,
    member(z,unordered_pair(x,y)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_174,c_604]) ).

cnf(c_953,plain,
    member(y,unordered_pair(x,z)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_175,c_619]) ).

cnf(c_1299,plain,
    ( z = y
    | z = x ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_918,c_140]) ).

cnf(c_1005,plain,
    z = x,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_1299]) ).

cnf(c_1300,plain,
    x != y,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1005,c_34]) ).

cnf(c_1013,plain,
    y != x,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_1300]) ).

cnf(c_1301,plain,
    ( y = z
    | y = x ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_953,c_140]) ).

cnf(c_1302,plain,
    ( z = y
    | y = x ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_1301]) ).

cnf(c_1303,plain,
    z = y,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1013,c_1302]) ).

cnf(c_1297,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_1303]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET017-7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/10.37  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.10/10.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/10.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/10.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/10.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/10.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/10.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/10.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 06:52:18 UTC 2026
% 0.10/10.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/10.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/10.37  % Process 1048438 was started by sandbox on n004,
% 0.10/10.37  % Sat Sep 26 06:52:18 2026
% 0.10/10.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.10/10.38  
% 0.10/10.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.14/10.47  
% 0.14/10.47  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.14/10.47  
% 0.14/10.47  % Proof 1 at 0.06 (+ 0.02) seconds.
% 0.14/10.47  % Length of proof is 21.
% 0.14/10.47  % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.14/10.47  % Maximum clause weight is 21.000.
% 0.14/10.47  % Given clauses 192.
% 0.14/10.47  
% 0.14/10.47  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------