↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SET018-7 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZWldVtThYp true

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:51:10 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.61s 0.85s
% Output   : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : SET018-7 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZWldVtThYp true
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 13:14:38 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.36  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36  % Running in FO mode
% 0.57/0.66  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.57/0.66  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.57/0.66  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.60/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.60/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.60/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.60/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.60/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.60/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.61/0.82  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.61/0.85  % Solved by fo/fo7.sh.
% 0.61/0.85  % done 63 iterations in 0.051s
% 0.61/0.85  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.61/0.85  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.61/0.85  thf(universal_class_type, type, universal_class: $i).
% 0.61/0.85  thf(member_type, type, member: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.61/0.85  thf(y_type, type, y: $i).
% 0.61/0.85  thf(x_type, type, x: $i).
% 0.61/0.85  thf(z_type, type, z: $i).
% 0.61/0.85  thf(ordered_pair_type, type, ordered_pair: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.61/0.85  thf(w_type, type, w: $i).
% 0.61/0.85  thf(prove_ordered_pair_determines_components2_1, conjecture,
% 0.61/0.85    (( ordered_pair @ w @ x ) != ( ordered_pair @ y @ z ))).
% 0.61/0.85  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.61/0.85    (( ordered_pair @ w @ x ) = ( ordered_pair @ y @ z )),
% 0.61/0.85    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)],
% 0.61/0.85              [prove_ordered_pair_determines_components2_1])).
% 0.61/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl74, plain,
% 0.61/0.85      (((ordered_pair @ w @ x) = (ordered_pair @ y @ z))),
% 0.61/0.85      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.61/0.85  thf(prove_ordered_pair_determines_components2_2, conjecture,
% 0.61/0.85    (~( member @ x @ universal_class ))).
% 0.61/0.85  thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture, (member @ x @ universal_class),
% 0.61/0.85    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)],
% 0.61/0.85              [prove_ordered_pair_determines_components2_2])).
% 0.61/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl73, plain, ( (member @ x @ universal_class)),
% 0.61/0.85      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
% 0.61/0.85  thf(ordered_pair_determines_components2, axiom,
% 0.61/0.85    (( ( ordered_pair @ W @ X ) != ( ordered_pair @ Y @ Z ) ) | 
% 0.61/0.85     ( ~( member @ X @ universal_class ) ) | ( ( X ) = ( Z ) ))).
% 0.61/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl63, plain,
% 0.61/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.61/0.85         (((ordered_pair @ X2 @ X3) != (ordered_pair @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.61/0.85          | ~ (member @ X3 @ universal_class)
% 0.61/0.85          | ((X3) = (X1)))),
% 0.61/0.85      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ordered_pair_determines_components2])).
% 0.61/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl119, plain,
% 0.61/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.61/0.85         (((x) = (X0)) | ((ordered_pair @ X1 @ x) != (ordered_pair @ X2 @ X0)))),
% 0.61/0.85      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl73, zip_derived_cl63])).
% 0.61/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl167, plain,
% 0.61/0.85      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.61/0.85         (((ordered_pair @ X0 @ x) != (ordered_pair @ w @ x)) | ((x) = (z)))),
% 0.61/0.85      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl74, zip_derived_cl119])).
% 0.61/0.85  thf(prove_ordered_pair_determines_components2_3, conjecture, (( x ) = ( z ))).
% 0.61/0.85  thf(zf_stmt_2, negated_conjecture, (( x ) != ( z )),
% 0.61/0.85    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)],
% 0.61/0.85              [prove_ordered_pair_determines_components2_3])).
% 0.61/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl72, plain, (((x) != (z))),
% 0.61/0.85      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_2])).
% 0.61/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl169, plain,
% 0.61/0.85      (![X0 : $i]: ((ordered_pair @ X0 @ x) != (ordered_pair @ w @ x))),
% 0.61/0.85      inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 0.61/0.85                [zip_derived_cl167, zip_derived_cl72])).
% 0.61/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl171, plain, ($false),
% 0.61/0.85      inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl169])).
% 0.61/0.85  
% 0.61/0.85  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.61/0.85  
% 0.61/0.85  
% 0.61/0.85  % Terminating...
% 0.62/0.89  % Runner terminated.
% 0.62/0.90  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------