↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SET019+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:46:06 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.18s 1.26s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   46 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   46 (  20   ~;  12   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   0 sgn  18   !;   4   ?;   4   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( equal_set(X0,X1)
    <=> ( subset(X1,X0)
        & subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',equal_set) ).

fof(f12,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( subset(X1,X0)
        & subset(X0,X1) )
     => equal_set(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thI02) ).

fof(f13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( subset(X1,X0)
          & subset(X0,X1) )
       => equal_set(X0,X1) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f12]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( subset(X1,X0)
        & subset(X0,X1) )
     => equal_set(X0,X1) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(X1,X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | equal_set(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(X1,X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | equal_set(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X1,X0)
      & subset(X0,X1)
      & ~ equal_set(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X1,X0)
      & subset(X0,X1)
      & ~ equal_set(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ( subset(sK4,sK3)
    & subset(sK3,sK4)
    & ~ equal_set(sK3,sK4) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3,sK4]),skolemize(X0,sK3),skolemize(X1,sK4)],[f20]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(X1,X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | equal_set(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f68,plain,
    subset(sK4,sK3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

fof(f69,plain,
    subset(sK3,sK4),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

fof(f70,plain,
    ~ equal_set(sK3,sK4),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

tcf(c_52,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( equal_set(X0,X1)
      | ~ subset(X1,X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

tcf(c_76,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equal_set(sK3,sK4),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f70]) ).

tcf(c_77,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK3,sK4),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f69]) ).

tcf(c_78,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK4,sK3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f68]) ).

tcf(c_434,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ subset(X1,X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | ( X1 != sK4 )
      | ( X0 != sK3 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_76]) ).

tcf(c_435,plain,
    ( ~ subset(sK4,sK3)
    | ~ subset(sK3,sK4) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_434]) ).

tcf(c_436,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_435,c_77,c_78]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET019+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 09:14:18 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.41  % Proving...
% 1.18/1.26  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.18/1.26  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.18/1.26  
% 1.18/1.26  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.18/1.26  
% 1.18/1.26  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.18/1.26  
% 1.18/1.26  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.18/1.26  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.18/1.26  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.18/1.26  
% 1.18/1.26  % ------ Parsing...
% 1.18/1.26  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.18/1.26  
% 1.18/1.26  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s % 
% 1.18/1.26  
% 1.18/1.26  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.18/1.26  
% 1.18/1.26  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.18/1.26  
% 1.18/1.26  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------