↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SET024-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:06:02 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 0.82s
% Output   : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    6 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    7 (   1 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(unordered_pair2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X,universal_class)
    | member(X,unordered_pair(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',unordered_pair2) ).

cnf(singleton_set,axiom,
    unordered_pair(X,X) = singleton(X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',singleton_set) ).

cnf(prove_set_in_its_singleton_1,negated_conjecture,
    member(x,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_set_in_its_singleton_1) ).

cnf(prove_set_in_its_singleton_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(x,singleton(x)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_set_in_its_singleton_2) ).

cnf(155,plain,
    member(x,unordered_pair(x,X)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[unordered_pair2,prove_set_in_its_singleton_1]) ).

cnf(1230,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[155,singleton_set,theory(equality)]),prove_set_in_its_singleton_2]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SET024-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 08:09:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.46   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.46   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.47  "."
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T08:09:08
% 0.19/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n008.cluster.edu at 2022-07-10T08:09:08
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|unordered_pair| ?X ?Y) (|unordered_pair| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.60/0.82  ; Declaring unordered_pair to be commutative.
% 0.60/0.82  
% 0.60/0.82  #||
% 0.60/0.82  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/0.82  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.60/0.82  ||#
% 0.60/0.82  
% 0.60/0.82  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.60/0.82  ;      3254 formulas have been input or derived (from 144 formulas).
% 0.60/0.82  ;      1230 (38%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.60/0.82  ;           31 ( 3%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.60/0.82  ;         1199 (97%) are still being kept.
% 0.60/0.82  ; 
% 0.60/0.82  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.60/0.82  ;     0.021   6%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.60/0.82  ;     0.005   1%   Assert                       (123 calls)
% 0.60/0.82  ;     0.080  23%   Process new row              (2,883 calls)
% 0.60/0.82  ;     0.062  18%   Resolution                   (286 calls)
% 0.60/0.82  ;     0.006   2%   Paramodulation               (143 calls)
% 0.60/0.82  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (8 calls)
% 0.60/0.82  ;     0.016   5%   Condensing                   (862 calls)
% 0.60/0.82  ;     0.042  12%   Forward subsumption          (862 calls)
% 0.60/0.82  ;     0.028   8%   Backward subsumption         (605 calls)
% 0.60/0.82  ;     0.009   3%   Clause clause subsumption    (1,104 calls)
% 0.60/0.82  ;     0.032   9%   Forward simplification       (2,882 calls)
% 0.60/0.82  ;     0.011   3%   Backward simplification      (1,218 calls)
% 0.60/0.82  ;     0.006   2%   Ordering                     (2,491 calls)
% 0.60/0.82  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.60/0.82  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.60/0.82  ;     0.034  10%   Other
% 0.60/0.82  ;     0.352        Total
% 0.60/0.82  ;     0.354        Real time
% 0.60/0.82  ; 
% 0.60/0.82  ; Term-hash-array has 2,194 terms in all.
% 0.60/0.82  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 588 entries (588 at peak, 605 added, 17 deleted).
% 0.60/0.82  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 2,795 nodes (2,795 at peak, 2,935 added, 140 deleted).
% 0.60/0.82  ;  Retrieved 1,860 possibly forward subsuming rows in 862 calls.
% 0.60/0.82  ;  Retrieved 296 possibly backward subsumed rows in 605 calls.
% 0.60/0.82  ; Path-index has 2,200 entries (2,200 at peak, 2,249 added, 49 deleted).
% 0.60/0.82  ; Path-index has 3,334 nodes (3,334 at peak, 3,373 added, 39 deleted).
% 0.60/0.82  ; Trie-index has 2,200 entries (2,200 at peak, 2,249 added, 49 deleted).
% 0.60/0.82  ; Trie-index has 6,247 nodes (6,247 at peak, 6,354 added, 107 deleted).
% 0.60/0.82  ; Retrieved 3,070 generalization terms in 8,661 calls.
% 0.60/0.82  ; Retrieved 632 instance terms in 612 calls.
% 0.60/0.82  ; Retrieved 65,110 unifiable terms in 2,515 calls.
% 0.60/0.82  ; 
% 0.60/0.82  ; The agenda of rows to process has 143 entries:
% 0.60/0.82  ;     3 with value 9              40 with value 15               6 with value 23
% 0.60/0.82  ;     3 with value 10             16 with value 16               1 with value 24
% 0.60/0.82  ;    13 with value 11              3 with value 18               4 with value 25
% 0.60/0.82  ;     4 with value 12              6 with value 19               4 with value 27
% 0.60/0.82  ;     4 with value 13              6 with value 20               4 with value 34
% 0.60/0.82  ;    24 with value 14              2 with value 22
% 0.60/0.82  ; The agenda of rows to give has 1056 entries:
% 0.60/0.82  ;    24 with value (4 8)          29 with value (4 22)           3 with value (4 37)
% 0.60/0.82  ;    36 with value (4 9)          24 with value (4 23)           1 with value (4 38)
% 0.60/0.82  ;    59 with value (4 10)         41 with value (4 24)           1 with value (4 41)
% 0.60/0.82  ;    54 with value (4 11)         13 with value (4 25)           1 with value (4 42)
% 0.60/0.82  ;    41 with value (4 12)         27 with value (4 26)           1 with value (4 43)
% 0.60/0.82  ;   103 with value (4 13)         16 with value (4 27)           1 with value (4 44)
% 0.60/0.82  ;   140 with value (4 14)          8 with value (4 28)           1 with value (4 45)
% 0.60/0.82  ;    79 with value (4 15)         13 with value (4 29)           3 with value (4 46)
% 0.60/0.82  ;    45 with value (4 16)         14 with value (4 30)           1 with value (4 49)
% 0.60/0.82  ;    30 with value (4 17)          3 with value (4 31)           1 with value (4 51)
% 0.60/0.82  ;    74 with value (4 18)          9 with value (4 32)           1 with value (4 53)
% 0.60/0.82  ;    75 with value (4 19)          2 with value (4 33)           1 with value (4 59)
% 0.60/0.82  ;    28 with value (4 20)          4 with value (4 34)           1 with value (4 63)
% 0.60/0.82  ;    40 with value (4 21)          8 with value (4 35)
% 0.60/0.82  Evaluation took:
% 0.60/0.82    0.355 seconds of real time
% 0.60/0.82    0.313062 seconds of user run time
% 0.60/0.82    0.041183 seconds of system run time
% 0.60/0.82    [Run times include 0.01 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.60/0.82    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.60/0.82    0 page faults and
% 0.60/0.82    24,164,232 bytes consed.
% 0.60/0.82  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.60/0.82  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T08:09:08
% 0.60/0.82  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.60/0.82  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------