↑ Up

hopCoP---0.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : hopCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SET027+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 25 03:31:11 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.68s 0.82s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   28 (  12   ~;  10   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn   9   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(transitivity,plain,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( ( subclass(X,Y)
        & subclass(Y,Z) )
     => subclass(X,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transitivity) ).

fof(transitivity_negated,plain,
    ~ ! [X,Y,Z] :
        ( ( subclass(X,Y)
          & subclass(Y,Z) )
       => subclass(X,Z) ),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[transitivity]) ).

cnf(89,plain,
    subclass(sK10,sK11),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[transitivity_negated]) ).

cnf(l0,plain,
    subclass(sK10,sK11),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[89]) ).

fof(subclass_defn,plain,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( subclass(X,Y)
    <=> ! [U] :
          ( member(U,X)
         => member(U,Y) ) ),
    file('Axioms/SET005+0.ax',subclass_defn) ).

cnf(0,plain,
    ( ~ subclass(X0,X1)
    | ~ member(X2,X0)
    | member(X2,X1) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[subclass_defn]) ).

cnf(l1,plain,
    ( ~ subclass(sK10,sK11)
    | ~ member(sK1(sK10,sK12),sK10)
    | member(sK1(sK10,sK12),sK11) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[0]) ).

cnf(1,plain,
    ( subclass(X0,X1)
    | member(sK1(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[subclass_defn]) ).

cnf(l30,plain,
    ( subclass(sK10,sK12)
    | member(sK1(sK10,sK12),sK10) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

cnf(91,plain,
    ~ subclass(sK10,sK12),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[transitivity_negated]) ).

cnf(l31,plain,
    ~ subclass(sK10,sK12),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[91]) ).

cnf(l3,plain,
    ( ~ subclass(sK11,sK12)
    | ~ member(sK1(sK10,sK12),sK11)
    | member(sK1(sK10,sK12),sK12) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[0]) ).

cnf(90,plain,
    subclass(sK11,sK12),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[transitivity_negated]) ).

cnf(l63,plain,
    subclass(sK11,sK12),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[90]) ).

cnf(2,plain,
    ( ~ member(sK1(X0,X1),X1)
    | subclass(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[subclass_defn]) ).

cnf(l5,plain,
    ( ~ member(sK1(sK10,sK12),sK12)
    | subclass(sK10,sK12) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

cnf(l9,plain,
    ~ subclass(sK10,sK12),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[91]) ).

cnf(final,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ground_refutation,[status(thm)],[l0,l1,l30,l31,l3,l63,l5,l9]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SET027+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jul 21 19:23:34 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 5
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 8
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 4
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 2
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 3
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 6
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 7
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 1
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 9
% 0.13/0.35  % launching worker at depth: 10
% 0.19/0.51  % launching worker at depth: 11
% 3.68/0.82  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 3.68/0.82  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------