↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SET042-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:13:15 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   33 (  11 unt;   0 nHn;  33 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   80 (   9 equ;  53 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   44 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cross_product4,axiom,
    ( ~ member(second(X1),X3)
    | ~ member(first(X1),X2)
    | ~ ordered_pair_predicate(X1)
    | ~ little_set(X1)
    | member(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET003-0.ax',cross_product4) ).

cnf(ordered_pairs_are_small2,axiom,
    ( ~ ordered_pair_predicate(X1)
    | little_set(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ordered_pairs_are_small2) ).

cnf(prove_ordered_pair_is_in_cross_product,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(ordered_pair(a,b),cross_product(set_a,set_b)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ordered_pair_is_in_cross_product) ).

cnf(a2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | little_set(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET003-0.ax',a2) ).

cnf(property_of_second,axiom,
    ( ~ little_set(X2)
    | ~ little_set(X1)
    | second(ordered_pair(X1,X2)) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',property_of_second) ).

cnf(member_of_set_b,hypothesis,
    member(b,set_b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',member_of_set_b) ).

cnf(member_of_set_a,hypothesis,
    member(a,set_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',member_of_set_a) ).

cnf(property_of_first,axiom,
    ( ~ little_set(X2)
    | ~ little_set(X1)
    | first(ordered_pair(X1,X2)) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',property_of_first) ).

cnf(ordered_pair_predicate4,axiom,
    ( X1 != ordered_pair(X2,X3)
    | ~ little_set(X3)
    | ~ little_set(X2)
    | ordered_pair_predicate(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET003-0.ax',ordered_pair_predicate4) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ member(second(X1),X3)
    | ~ member(first(X1),X2)
    | ~ ordered_pair_predicate(X1)
    | ~ little_set(X1)
    | member(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cross_product4]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ ordered_pair_predicate(X1)
    | little_set(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ordered_pairs_are_small2]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(ordered_pair(a,b),cross_product(set_a,set_b)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_ordered_pair_is_in_cross_product]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ member(second(X1),X3)
    | ~ member(first(X1),X2)
    | ~ ordered_pair_predicate(X1)
    | ~ little_set(X1)
    | member(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) ),
    c_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ ordered_pair_predicate(X1)
    | little_set(X1) ),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | little_set(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[a2]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(ordered_pair(a,b),cross_product(set_a,set_b)),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ member(second(X1),X3)
    | ~ member(first(X1),X2)
    | ~ ordered_pair_predicate(X1)
    | member(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ little_set(X2)
    | ~ little_set(X1)
    | second(ordered_pair(X1,X2)) = X2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[property_of_second]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | little_set(X1) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
    member(b,set_b),
    member_of_set_b ).

cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
    member(a,set_a),
    member_of_set_a ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(second(ordered_pair(a,b)),set_b)
    | ~ member(first(ordered_pair(a,b)),set_a)
    | ~ ordered_pair_predicate(ordered_pair(a,b)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ little_set(X2)
    | ~ little_set(X1)
    | second(ordered_pair(X1,X2)) = X2 ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
    little_set(b),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
    little_set(a),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ little_set(X2)
    | ~ little_set(X1)
    | first(ordered_pair(X1,X2)) = X1 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[property_of_first]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( X1 != ordered_pair(X2,X3)
    | ~ little_set(X3)
    | ~ little_set(X2)
    | ordered_pair_predicate(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ordered_pair_predicate4]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(first(ordered_pair(a,b)),set_a)
    | ~ ordered_pair_predicate(ordered_pair(a,b)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_19]),c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ little_set(X2)
    | ~ little_set(X1)
    | first(ordered_pair(X1,X2)) = X1 ),
    c_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( X1 != ordered_pair(X2,X3)
    | ~ little_set(X3)
    | ~ little_set(X2)
    | ordered_pair_predicate(X1) ),
    c_0_26 ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ordered_pair_predicate(ordered_pair(a,b)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_20]),c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ little_set(X1)
    | ~ little_set(X2)
    | ordered_pair_predicate(ordered_pair(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_23]),c_0_24])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET042-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 04:47:13 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.46  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.46  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.46  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.46  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.46  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.46  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.46  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.46  % new_bool_3 with pid 868711 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.12/0.46  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.46  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.46  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.46  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.46  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.12/0.46  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.12/0.46  % Search class: FHUSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.46  % partial match(1): FHUSM-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.46  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.46  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.46  % SubtermCWHack with pid 868716 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.12/0.46  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.46  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.46  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.46  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.46  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.12/0.46  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.12/0.46  % Search class: FHUSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.46  % partial match(1): FHUSM-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.46  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.46  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.46  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.12/0.46  
% 0.12/0.46  % Proof found!
% 0.12/0.46  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.46  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.46  % Parsed axioms                        : 170
% 0.12/0.46  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 122
% 0.12/0.46  % Initial clauses                      : 48
% 0.12/0.46  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 48
% 0.12/0.46  % Processed clauses                    : 149
% 0.12/0.46  % ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.12/0.46  % ...subsumed                          : 19
% 0.12/0.46  % ...remaining for further processing  : 127
% 0.12/0.46  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 8
% 0.12/0.46  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.12/0.46  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Generated clauses                    : 295
% 0.12/0.46  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 276
% 0.12/0.46  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 4
% 0.12/0.46  % Paramodulations                      : 285
% 0.12/0.46  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Equation resolutions                 : 10
% 0.12/0.46  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Total rewrite steps                  : 17
% 0.12/0.46  % ...of those cached                   : 7
% 0.12/0.46  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.12/0.46  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.12/0.46  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.46  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.12/0.46  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.46  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.12/0.46  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.12/0.46  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.12/0.46  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.12/0.46  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.12/0.46  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.12/0.46  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.12/0.46  % Current number of processed clauses  : 117
% 0.12/0.46  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 10
% 0.12/0.46  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.46  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.12/0.46  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 105
% 0.12/0.46  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 175
% 0.12/0.46  % ...number of literals in the above   : 555
% 0.12/0.46  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.12/0.46  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 992
% 0.12/0.46  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 687
% 0.12/0.46  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 24
% 0.12/0.46  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.12/0.46  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 13
% 0.12/0.46  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 7556
% 0.12/0.46  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 698
% 0.12/0.46  
% 0.12/0.46  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.46  % User time                : 0.015 s
% 0.12/0.46  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.12/0.46  % Total time               : 0.019 s
% 0.12/0.46  % Maximum resident set size: 3784 pages
% 0.12/0.46  
% 0.12/0.46  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.46  % User time                : 0.019 s
% 0.12/0.46  % System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.12/0.46  % Total time               : 0.028 s
% 0.12/0.46  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.12/0.46  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------