↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET044+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:35:28 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   38 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   43 (  18   ~;  13   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   0 sgn  12   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(pel40,conjecture,
    ( ? [Y] :
      ! [X] :
        ( element(X,Y)
      <=> element(X,X) )
   => ~ ! [X1] :
        ? [Y1] :
        ! [Z] :
          ( element(Z,Y1)
        <=> ~ element(Z,X1) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',pel40) ).

fof(pel40_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ? [Y] :
        ! [X] :
          ( element(X,Y)
        <=> element(X,X) )
     => ~ ! [X1] :
          ? [Y1] :
          ! [Z] :
            ( element(Z,Y1)
          <=> ~ element(Z,X1) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[pel40]) ).

fof(nnf_1,plain,
    ( ! [X1] :
      ? [Y1] :
      ! [Z] :
        ( ( element(Z,X1)
          | element(Z,Y1) )
        & ( ~ element(Z,X1)
          | ~ element(Z,Y1) ) )
    & ? [Y] :
      ! [X] :
        ( ( ~ element(X,X)
          | element(X,Y) )
        & ( element(X,X)
          | ~ element(X,Y) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[pel40_neg]) ).

fof(sk_pel40_neg,plain,
    ( ! [X1,Z] :
        ( ( element(Z,X1)
          | element(Z,sK1(X1)) )
        & ( ~ element(Z,X1)
          | ~ element(Z,sK1(X1)) ) )
    & ! [X] :
        ( ( ~ element(X,X)
          | element(X,sK0) )
        & ( element(X,X)
          | ~ element(X,sK0) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(Y,sK0),skolemize(Y1,sK1(X1))],[nnf_1]) ).

cnf(c_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( element(A,A)
    | ~ element(A,sK0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_pel40_neg]) ).

cnf(c_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ element(A,A)
    | element(A,sK0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_pel40_neg]) ).

cnf(c_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ element(A,B)
    | ~ element(A,sK1(B)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_pel40_neg]) ).

cnf(c_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( element(A,B)
    | element(A,sK1(B)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_pel40_neg]) ).

cnf(c_6,plain,
    ( element(sK1(A),sK0)
    | element(sK1(A),A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_5,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_7,plain,
    element(sK1(sK0),sK0),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_6]) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    element(sK1(sK0),sK1(sK0)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_7,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ element(sK1(sK0),sK1(sK0)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_7]) ).

cnf(c_10,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_9,c_11]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET044+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 06:57:08 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.38  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.38  % Process 3060848 was started by sandbox on n007,
% 0.09/0.38  % Sat Sep 26 06:57:08 2026
% 0.09/0.38  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.38  
% 0.09/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.09/0.39  
% 0.09/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.39  
% 0.09/0.39  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.09/0.39  % Length of proof is 9.
% 0.09/0.39  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.09/0.39  % Maximum clause weight is 8.000.
% 0.09/0.39  % Given clauses 6.
% 0.09/0.39  
% 0.09/0.39  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------