↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET045+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:35:28 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.04s 0.31s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.04s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   37 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   42 (  20   ~;  14   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (   2 sgn  16   !;   5   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(pel41_1,axiom,
    ! [Z] :
    ? [Y] :
    ! [X] :
      ( element(X,Y)
    <=> ( ~ element(X,X)
        & element(X,Z) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',pel41_1) ).

fof(pel41,conjecture,
    ~ ? [Z] :
      ! [X] : element(X,Z),
    file('theBenchmark.p',pel41) ).

fof(pel41_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ? [Z] :
        ! [X] : element(X,Z),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[pel41]) ).

fof(nnf_1,plain,
    ! [Z] :
    ? [Y] :
    ! [X] :
      ( ( element(X,X)
        | ~ element(X,Z)
        | element(X,Y) )
      & ( ( ~ element(X,X)
          & element(X,Z) )
        | ~ element(X,Y) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[pel41_1]) ).

fof(sk_pel41_1_sk,plain,
    ! [Z,X] :
      ( ( element(X,X)
        | ~ element(X,Z)
        | element(X,sK0(Z)) )
      & ( ( ~ element(X,X)
          & element(X,Z) )
        | ~ element(X,sK0(Z)) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(Y,sK0(Z))],[nnf_1]) ).

fof(sk_pel41_1,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( element(VAR_0,VAR_0)
        | ~ element(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | element(VAR_0,sK0(VAR_1)) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ element(VAR_0,VAR_0)
        | ~ element(VAR_0,sK0(VAR_1)) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( element(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | ~ element(VAR_0,sK0(VAR_1)) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_pel41_1_sk]) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    ( ~ element(A,A)
    | ~ element(A,sK0(B)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_pel41_1]) ).

cnf(c_5,plain,
    ( element(A,A)
    | ~ element(A,B)
    | element(A,sK0(B)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_pel41_1]) ).

fof(nnf_2,plain,
    ? [Z] :
    ! [X] : element(X,Z),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[pel41_neg]) ).

fof(sk_pel41_neg,plain,
    ! [X] : element(X,sK1),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(Z,sK1)],[nnf_2]) ).

cnf(c_6,negated_conjecture,
    element(A,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_pel41_neg]) ).

cnf(c_7,plain,
    ~ element(sK0(A),sK0(A)),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_4]) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    ( ~ element(sK0(A),A)
    | element(sK0(A),sK0(A)) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_5]) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    ~ element(sK0(A),A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_7,c_10]) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_6]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SET045+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.04/0.29  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.04/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.04/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.04/0.29  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.04/0.29  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/0.29  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.04/0.29  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 06:59:05 UTC 2026
% 0.04/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.04/0.30  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.04/0.30  % Process 4142289 was started by sandbox2 on n012,
% 0.04/0.30  % Sat Sep 26 06:59:05 2026
% 0.04/0.30  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.04/0.30  
% 0.04/0.30  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.04/0.31  
% 0.04/0.31  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.04/0.31  
% 0.04/0.31  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.04/0.31  % Length of proof is 8.
% 0.04/0.31  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.04/0.31  % Maximum clause weight is 10.000.
% 0.04/0.31  % Given clauses 0.
% 0.04/0.31  
% 0.04/0.31  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------