↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SET045-5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 14:20:17 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.52s 0.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.52s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem    : SET045-5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.11  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.10/0.32  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 12:29:08 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.50/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.59  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.52/0.59  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.59  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.52/0.59  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.52/0.59  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.52/0.59  
% 0.52/0.59  % Result      :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.52/0.59  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.52/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60  % File     : SET045-5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.52/0.60  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.52/0.60  % Problem  : No Universal Set
% 0.52/0.60  % Version  : [Pel86] axioms : Incomplete.
% 0.52/0.60  % English  : The restricted comprehension axiom says : given a set
% 0.52/0.60  %            z, there is a set all of whose members are drawn from z and
% 0.52/0.60  %            which satisfy some property. If there were a universal set,
% 0.52/0.60  %            then the Russell set could be formed, using this axiom.
% 0.52/0.60  %            So given the appropriate instance of this axiom, there
% 0.52/0.60  %            is no universal set.
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  % Refs     : [Pel86] Pelletier (1986), Seventy-five Problems for Testing Au
% 0.52/0.60  % Source   : [Pel86]
% 0.52/0.60  % Names    : Pelletier 41 [Pel86]
% 0.52/0.60  %          : p41.in [ANL]
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.52/0.60  % Rating   : 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.52/0.60  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    4 (   1 unt;   1 nHn;   3 RR)
% 0.52/0.60  %            Number of literals    :    8 (   0 equ;   4 neg)
% 0.52/0.60  %            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
% 0.52/0.60  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.52/0.60  %            Number of predicates  :    1 (   1 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.52/0.60  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
% 0.52/0.60  %            Number of variables   :    7 (   2 sgn)
% 0.52/0.60  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  % Comments :
% 0.52/0.60  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60  cnf(clause_1,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60      ( ~ element(X,f(Y))
% 0.52/0.60      | element(X,Y) ) ).
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  cnf(clause_2,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60      ( ~ element(X,f(Y))
% 0.52/0.60      | ~ element(X,X) ) ).
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  cnf(clause_3,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60      ( ~ element(X,Y)
% 0.52/0.60      | element(X,X)
% 0.52/0.60      | element(X,f(Y)) ) ).
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  cnf(clause_4,negated_conjecture,
% 0.52/0.60      element(X,a) ).
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60  % Proof found
% 0.52/0.60  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.60  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.52/0.60  %ClaNum:4(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.52/0.60  %VarNum:15(SingletonVarNum:7)
% 0.52/0.60  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.52/0.60  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.52/0.60  %SharedTerms:1
% 0.52/0.60  %goalClause: 1
% 0.52/0.60  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.52/0.60  [1]P1(x11,a1)
% 0.52/0.60  [2]P1(x21,x22)+~P1(x21,f2(x22))
% 0.52/0.60  [3]~P1(x31,x31)+~P1(x31,f2(x32))
% 0.52/0.60  [4]~P1(x41,x42)+P1(x41,x41)+P1(x41,f2(x42))
% 0.52/0.60  %EqnAxiom
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60  cnf(6,plain,
% 0.52/0.60     ($false),
% 0.52/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,3]),
% 0.52/0.60     ['proof']).
% 0.52/0.60  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.52/0.60  % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------