↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SET047+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:46:15 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.71s 1.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (   1 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  119 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  142 (  58   ~;  68   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   0 sgn  42   !;   6   ?;  16   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( set_equal(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( element(X2,X0)
        <=> element(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pel43_1) ).

fof(f2,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( set_equal(X0,X1)
    <=> set_equal(X1,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pel43) ).

fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( set_equal(X0,X1)
      <=> set_equal(X1,X0) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( set_equal(X0,X1)
    <~> set_equal(X1,X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ set_equal(X0,X1)
        | ! [X2] :
            ( ( ~ element(X2,X0)
              | element(X2,X1) )
            & ( ~ element(X2,X1)
              | element(X2,X0) ) ) )
      & ( ? [X2] :
            ( ( element(X2,X0)
              | element(X2,X1) )
            & ( ~ element(X2,X0)
              | ~ element(X2,X1) ) )
        | set_equal(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ set_equal(X0,X1)
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ( ~ element(X3,X0)
              | element(X3,X1) )
            & ( ~ element(X3,X1)
              | element(X3,X0) ) ) )
      & ( ? [X2] :
            ( ( element(X2,X0)
              | element(X2,X1) )
            & ( ~ element(X2,X0)
              | ~ element(X2,X1) ) )
        | set_equal(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ set_equal(X0,X1)
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ( ~ element(X3,X0)
              | element(X3,X1) )
            & ( ~ element(X3,X1)
              | element(X3,X0) ) ) )
      & ( ( ( element(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
            | element(sK0(X0,X1),X1) )
          & ( ~ element(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
            | ~ element(sK0(X0,X1),X1) ) )
        | set_equal(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X2,sK0(X0,X1))],[f6]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ( set_equal(X0,X1)
        | set_equal(X1,X0) )
      & ( ~ set_equal(X0,X1)
        | ~ set_equal(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ( ( set_equal(sK1,sK2)
      | set_equal(sK2,sK1) )
    & ( ~ set_equal(sK1,sK2)
      | ~ set_equal(sK2,sK1) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK1),skolemize(X1,sK2)],[f8]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ! [X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ set_equal(X0,X1)
      | ~ element(X3,X0)
      | element(X3,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ set_equal(X0,X1)
      | ~ element(X3,X1)
      | element(X3,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( element(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
      | element(sK0(X0,X1),X1)
      | set_equal(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ element(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
      | ~ element(sK0(X0,X1),X1)
      | set_equal(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ( set_equal(sK1,sK2)
    | set_equal(sK2,sK1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ( ~ set_equal(sK1,sK2)
    | ~ set_equal(sK2,sK1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( set_equal(X0,X1)
      | ~ element(sK0(X0,X1),X1)
      | ~ element(sK0(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( set_equal(X0,X1)
      | element(sK0(X0,X1),X1)
      | element(sK0(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tcf(c_51,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( element(X2,X0)
      | ~ element(X2,X1)
      | ~ set_equal(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

tcf(c_52,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( element(X2,X1)
      | ~ element(X2,X0)
      | ~ set_equal(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

tcf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ set_equal(sK1,sK2)
    | ~ set_equal(sK2,sK1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tcf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_equal(sK1,sK2)
    | set_equal(sK2,sK1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

tcf(c_111,plain,
    ( set_equal(sK1,sK2)
    | ~ element(sK0(sK1,sK2),sK1)
    | ~ element(sK0(sK1,sK2),sK2) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).

tcf(c_112,plain,
    ( set_equal(sK1,sK2)
    | element(sK0(sK1,sK2),sK1)
    | element(sK0(sK1,sK2),sK2) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_50]) ).

tcf(c_113,plain,
    ( set_equal(sK2,sK1)
    | element(sK0(sK2,sK1),sK1)
    | element(sK0(sK2,sK1),sK2) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_50]) ).

tcf(c_114,plain,
    ( set_equal(sK2,sK1)
    | ~ element(sK0(sK2,sK1),sK1)
    | ~ element(sK0(sK2,sK1),sK2) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).

tcf(c_115,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( element(sK0(sK2,sK1),X0)
      | ~ set_equal(X0,sK2)
      | ~ element(sK0(sK2,sK1),sK2) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_51]) ).

tcf(c_116,plain,
    ( element(sK0(sK2,sK1),sK1)
    | ~ set_equal(sK1,sK2)
    | ~ element(sK0(sK2,sK1),sK2) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_115]) ).

tcf(c_123,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( element(sK0(sK1,sK2),X0)
      | ~ set_equal(sK2,X0)
      | ~ element(sK0(sK1,sK2),sK2) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_52]) ).

tcf(c_124,plain,
    ( element(sK0(sK1,sK2),sK1)
    | ~ set_equal(sK2,sK1)
    | ~ element(sK0(sK1,sK2),sK2) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_123]) ).

tcf(c_125,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( element(sK0(sK1,sK2),X1)
      | ~ set_equal(X1,X0)
      | ~ element(sK0(sK1,sK2),X0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_51]) ).

tcf(c_135,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( element(sK0(sK1,sK2),sK2)
      | ~ set_equal(sK2,X0)
      | ~ element(sK0(sK1,sK2),X0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_125]) ).

tcf(c_136,plain,
    ( element(sK0(sK1,sK2),sK2)
    | ~ set_equal(sK2,sK1)
    | ~ element(sK0(sK1,sK2),sK1) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_135]) ).

tcf(c_146,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( element(sK0(sK2,sK1),X0)
      | ~ set_equal(sK1,X0)
      | ~ element(sK0(sK2,sK1),sK1) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_52]) ).

tcf(c_152,plain,
    ( element(sK0(sK2,sK1),sK2)
    | ~ set_equal(sK1,sK2)
    | ~ element(sK0(sK2,sK1),sK1) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_146]) ).

tcf(c_162,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_152,c_136,c_124,c_116,c_113,c_114,c_112,c_111,c_53,c_54]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET047+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 09:26:13 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.42  
% 0.09/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.09/0.42  
% 0.09/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.09/0.43  % Proving...
% 1.71/1.27  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.71/1.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.71/1.27  
% 1.71/1.27  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.71/1.27  
% 1.71/1.27  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.71/1.27  
% 1.71/1.27  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.71/1.27  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.71/1.27  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.71/1.27  
% 1.71/1.27  % ------ Parsing...
% 1.71/1.27  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.71/1.27  
% 1.71/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.71/1.27  
% 1.71/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 1.71/1.27  % ------ Proving...
% 1.71/1.27  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.71/1.27  
% 1.71/1.27  % 
% 1.71/1.27  % clauses                               6
% 1.71/1.27  % conjectures                           2
% 1.71/1.27  % EPR                                   4
% 1.71/1.27  % Horn                                  4
% 1.71/1.27  % unary                                 0
% 1.71/1.27  % binary                                2
% 1.71/1.27  % lits                                  16
% 1.71/1.27  % lits eq                               0
% 1.71/1.27  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.71/1.27  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.71/1.27  % fd_cond                               0
% 1.71/1.27  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 1.71/1.27  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.71/1.27  
% 1.71/1.27  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.71/1.27  
% 1.71/1.27  % ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 1.71/1.27  
% 1.71/1.27  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.71/1.27  
% 1.71/1.27  
% 1.71/1.27  % ------ 
% 1.71/1.27  % Current options:
% 1.71/1.27  % ------ 
% 1.71/1.27  
% 1.71/1.27  
% 1.71/1.27  % 
% 1.71/1.27  
% 1.71/1.27  % ------ Proving...
% 1.71/1.27  % 
% 1.71/1.27  
% 1.71/1.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.71/1.27  
% 1.71/1.27  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.71/1.27  
% 1.71/1.27  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------