↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SET047-5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 14:20:18 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08  % Problem    : SET047-5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.06/0.26  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.26  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.26  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.26  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.06/0.26  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.06/0.26  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.06/0.26  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.06/0.26  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 12:34:23 EDT 2024
% 0.06/0.27  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.44  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.49  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.49  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.13/0.49  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.49  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.13/0.49  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.13/0.49  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.49  
% 0.13/0.49  % Result      :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.13/0.49  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.13/0.49  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.49  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.49  % File     : SET047-5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.13/0.49  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.13/0.49  % Problem  : Set equality is symmetric
% 0.13/0.49  % Version  : [Pel86] axioms : Incomplete.
% 0.13/0.49  % English  : Define set equality as having exactly the same members. Prove
% 0.13/0.49  %            set equality is symmetric.
% 0.13/0.49  
% 0.13/0.49  % Refs     : [DeC79] DeChampeaux (1979), Sub-problem Finder and Instance Ch
% 0.13/0.49  %          : [Pel86] Pelletier (1986), Seventy-five Problems for Testing Au
% 0.13/0.49  % Source   : [Pel86]
% 0.13/0.49  % Names    : Pelletier 43 [Pel86]
% 0.13/0.49  %          : p43.in [ANL]
% 0.13/0.49  
% 0.13/0.49  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.49  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.3.0, 0.14 v6.2.0, 0.00 v5.1.0, 0.09 v5.0.0, 0.07 v4.1.0, 0.12 v4.0.1, 0.00 v2.1.0, 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.13/0.49  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    6 (   0 unt;   2 nHn;   5 RR)
% 0.13/0.49  %            Number of literals    :   16 (   0 equ;   8 neg)
% 0.13/0.49  %            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
% 0.13/0.49  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.13/0.49  %            Number of predicates  :    2 (   2 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.13/0.49  %            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.13/0.49  %            Number of variables   :   10 (   0 sgn)
% 0.13/0.49  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 0.13/0.49  
% 0.13/0.49  % Comments :
% 0.13/0.49  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.49  cnf(element_substitution1,axiom,
% 0.13/0.49      ( ~ set_equal(X,Y)
% 0.13/0.49      | ~ element(Z,X)
% 0.13/0.49      | element(Z,Y) ) ).
% 0.13/0.49  
% 0.13/0.49  cnf(element_substitution2,axiom,
% 0.13/0.49      ( ~ set_equal(X,Y)
% 0.13/0.49      | ~ element(Z,Y)
% 0.13/0.49      | element(Z,X) ) ).
% 0.13/0.49  
% 0.13/0.49  cnf(clause_3,axiom,
% 0.13/0.49      ( element(f(X,Y),X)
% 0.13/0.49      | element(f(X,Y),Y)
% 0.13/0.49      | set_equal(X,Y) ) ).
% 0.13/0.49  
% 0.13/0.49  cnf(clause_4,axiom,
% 0.13/0.49      ( ~ element(f(X,Y),Y)
% 0.13/0.49      | ~ element(f(X,Y),X)
% 0.13/0.49      | set_equal(X,Y) ) ).
% 0.13/0.49  
% 0.13/0.49  cnf(prove_symmetry1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.13/0.49      ( set_equal(a,b)
% 0.13/0.49      | set_equal(b,a) ) ).
% 0.13/0.49  
% 0.13/0.49  cnf(prove_symmetry2,negated_conjecture,
% 0.13/0.49      ( ~ set_equal(b,a)
% 0.13/0.49      | ~ set_equal(a,b) ) ).
% 0.13/0.49  
% 0.13/0.49  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.49  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.49  % Proof found
% 0.13/0.49  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.49  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.13/0.49  %ClaNum:6(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.13/0.49  %VarNum:28(SingletonVarNum:10)
% 0.13/0.49  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.13/0.49  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.13/0.49  %SharedTerms:6
% 0.13/0.49  %goalClause: 1 2
% 0.13/0.49  [1]P1(a1,a2)+P1(a2,a1)
% 0.13/0.49  [2]~P1(a1,a2)+~P1(a2,a1)
% 0.13/0.49  [5]P1(x51,x52)+P2(f3(x51,x52),x52)+P2(f3(x51,x52),x51)
% 0.13/0.49  [6]P1(x61,x62)+~P2(f3(x61,x62),x62)+~P2(f3(x61,x62),x61)
% 0.13/0.49  [3]~P2(x31,x33)+P2(x31,x32)+~P1(x33,x32)
% 0.13/0.49  [4]~P2(x41,x43)+P2(x41,x42)+~P1(x42,x43)
% 0.13/0.49  %EqnAxiom
% 0.13/0.49  
% 0.13/0.49  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.50  cnf(8,plain,
% 0.13/0.50     (~P2(x81,a1)+P2(x81,a2)+P1(a2,a1)),
% 0.13/0.50     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,1])).
% 0.13/0.50  cnf(9,plain,
% 0.13/0.50     (~P2(x91,a2)+P2(x91,a1)+P1(a2,a1)),
% 0.13/0.50     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,1])).
% 0.13/0.50  cnf(12,plain,
% 0.13/0.50     (~P2(f3(a1,a2),a2)+~P2(f3(a1,a2),a1)+~P1(a2,a1)),
% 0.13/0.50     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,2])).
% 0.13/0.50  cnf(15,plain,
% 0.13/0.50     (~P2(x151,a2)+P2(x151,a1)+P1(a1,a2)),
% 0.13/0.50     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3])).
% 0.13/0.50  cnf(16,plain,
% 0.13/0.50     (~P2(f3(a1,a2),a2)+P1(a1,a2)+~P1(a2,a1)),
% 0.13/0.50     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,12])).
% 0.13/0.50  cnf(17,plain,
% 0.13/0.50     (P1(a1,a2)+P2(f3(a1,a2),a1)+~P1(a2,a1)),
% 0.13/0.50     inference(scs_inference,[],[16,5])).
% 0.13/0.50  cnf(18,plain,
% 0.13/0.50     (P2(f3(a1,a2),a1)+~P1(a2,a1)),
% 0.13/0.50     inference(scs_inference,[],[17,2])).
% 0.13/0.50  cnf(19,plain,
% 0.13/0.50     (~P1(x191,a1)+P2(f3(a1,a2),x191)+~P1(a2,a1)),
% 0.13/0.50     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,4])).
% 0.13/0.50  cnf(20,plain,
% 0.13/0.50     (~P2(f3(a1,a2),a1)+~P1(a2,a1)),
% 0.13/0.50     inference(scs_inference,[],[19,12])).
% 0.13/0.50  cnf(21,plain,
% 0.13/0.50     (~P1(a2,a1)),
% 0.13/0.50     inference(scs_inference,[],[20,18])).
% 0.13/0.50  cnf(23,plain,
% 0.13/0.50     (P2(x231,a2)+~P2(x231,a1)),
% 0.13/0.50     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,8])).
% 0.13/0.50  cnf(24,plain,
% 0.13/0.50     (P2(x241,a1)+~P2(x241,a2)),
% 0.13/0.50     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,9])).
% 0.13/0.50  cnf(28,plain,
% 0.13/0.50     (~P2(f3(a2,a1),a1)),
% 0.13/0.50     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,23,6])).
% 0.13/0.50  cnf(31,plain,
% 0.13/0.50     ($false),
% 0.13/0.50     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,28,5,24]),
% 0.13/0.50     ['proof']).
% 0.13/0.50  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.13/0.50  % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------