↑ Up

LisaST---0.9.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LisaST---0.9
% Problem  : SET054+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:31:46 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 17.74s 8.06s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 17.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   13 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    8 (   3   ~;   3   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   0 sgn   5   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(subclass_defn,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subclass(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( member(X2,X0)
         => member(X2,X1) ) ) ).

fof(reflexivity_of_subclass,conjecture,
    ! [X0] : subclass(X0,X0) ).

fof(negated_conjecture,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] : subclass(X0,X0),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[reflexivity_of_subclass]) ).

cnf(c1,plain,
    ( member(sK3(X0,X1),X0)
    | subclass(X0,X1) ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[subclass_defn]) ).

cnf(c2,plain,
    ( ~ member(sK3(X0,X1),X1)
    | subclass(X0,X1) ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[subclass_defn]) ).

cnf(c89,plain,
    ~ subclass(sK90,sK90),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[negated_conjecture]) ).

cnf(d0,plain,
    ( subclass(X0,X0)
    | subclass(X0,X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c2,c1]) ).

cnf(d1,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d0,c89]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SET054+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/5.44  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.18/5.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/5.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/5.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/5.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/5.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/5.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/5.44  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 06:59:53 UTC 2026
% 0.18/5.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/5.45  Running casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 17.74/8.06  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 17.74/8.06  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------