%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SET055-7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:13:19 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.08s 0.35s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.08s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 16 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_implies_equal,axiom,
( ~ subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ subclass(X1,X2)
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subclass_implies_equal) ).
cnf(prove_reflexivity,negated_conjecture,
~ equalish(x,x),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_reflexivity) ).
cnf(subclass_is_reflexive,axiom,
subclass(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subclass_is_reflexive) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ subclass(X1,X2)
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subclass_implies_equal]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ equalish(x,x),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_reflexivity]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ subclass(X1,X2)
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
subclass(X1,X1),
subclass_is_reflexive ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ equalish(x,x),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
equalish(X1,X1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_6])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01 % Problem : SET055-7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.02 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.05/0.31 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.05/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.05/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.05/0.31 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.05/0.31 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.05/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.05/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.05/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 04:47:53 UTC 2026
% 0.05/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.05/0.31 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.33 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.33 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.35 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.08/0.35 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.08/0.35 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.35 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.35 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.35 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.35 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.35 % sh5l with pid 1588034 completed with status 0
% 0.08/0.35 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.08/0.35 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.08/0.35 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.35 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.35 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.35 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.35 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.35 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.08/0.35 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.08/0.35 % Search class: FGHNM-FFLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.08/0.35 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.08/0.35 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.35 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1588041 completed with status 0
% 0.08/0.35 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.08/0.35 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.08/0.35 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.35 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.35 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.35 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.35 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.35 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.08/0.35 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.08/0.35 % Search class: FGHNM-FFLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.08/0.35 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.08/0.35 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.35 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.08/0.35
% 0.08/0.35 % Proof found!
% 0.08/0.35 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.08/0.35 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.08/0.35 % Parsed axioms : 165
% 0.08/0.35 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 5
% 0.08/0.35 % Initial clauses : 160
% 0.08/0.35 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.08/0.35 % Initial clauses in saturation : 160
% 0.08/0.35 % Processed clauses : 122
% 0.08/0.35 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.08/0.35 % ...subsumed : 4
% 0.08/0.35 % ...remaining for further processing : 118
% 0.08/0.35 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.08/0.35 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.08/0.35 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.08/0.35 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.08/0.35 % Generated clauses : 254
% 0.08/0.35 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 222
% 0.08/0.35 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.08/0.35 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.08/0.35 % Paramodulations : 254
% 0.08/0.35 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.08/0.35 % NegExts : 0
% 0.08/0.35 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.08/0.35 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.08/0.35 % Total rewrite steps : 8
% 0.08/0.35 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.08/0.35 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.08/0.35 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.08/0.35 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.08/0.35 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.08/0.35 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.08/0.35 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.08/0.35 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.35 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.35 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.35 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.35 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.35 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.35 % Current number of processed clauses : 117
% 0.08/0.35 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 23
% 0.08/0.35 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.08/0.35 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.08/0.35 % Non-unit-clauses : 94
% 0.08/0.35 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 260
% 0.08/0.35 % ...number of literals in the above : 631
% 0.08/0.35 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.08/0.35 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.08/0.35 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1872
% 0.08/0.35 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1394
% 0.08/0.35 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.08/0.35 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 28
% 0.08/0.35 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.08/0.35 % BW rewrite match attempts : 33
% 0.08/0.35 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.08/0.35 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.08/0.35 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.08/0.35 % Termbank termtop insertions : 7019
% 0.08/0.35 % Search garbage collected termcells : 276
% 0.08/0.35
% 0.08/0.35 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.08/0.35 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.08/0.35 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.08/0.35 % Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.08/0.35 % Maximum resident set size: 4028 pages
% 0.08/0.35
% 0.08/0.35 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.08/0.35 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.08/0.35 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.08/0.35 % Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.08/0.35 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.08/0.35 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------