↑ Up

hopCoP---0.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : hopCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SET056+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 25 03:31:18 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   45 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   44 (  18   ~;  18   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (   0 sgn   9   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(equality1,plain,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( X = Y
      | ? [U] :
          ( member(U,X)
          & ~ member(U,Y) )
      | ? [W] :
          ( member(W,Y)
          & ~ member(W,X) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equality1) ).

fof(equality1_negated,plain,
    ~ ! [X,Y] :
        ( X = Y
        | ? [U] :
            ( member(U,X)
            & ~ member(U,Y) )
        | ? [W] :
            ( member(W,Y)
            & ~ member(W,X) ) ),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[equality1]) ).

cnf(89,plain,
    sK10 != sK11,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[equality1_negated]) ).

cnf(l0,plain,
    sK10 != sK11,
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[89]) ).

fof(extensionality,plain,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( X = Y
    <=> ( subclass(X,Y)
        & subclass(Y,X) ) ),
    file('Axioms/SET005+0.ax',extensionality) ).

cnf(6,plain,
    ( ~ subclass(X0,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X0)
    | X0 = X1 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[extensionality]) ).

cnf(l1,plain,
    ( ~ subclass(sK10,sK11)
    | ~ subclass(sK11,sK10)
    | sK10 = sK11 ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

fof(subclass_defn,plain,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( subclass(X,Y)
    <=> ! [U] :
          ( member(U,X)
         => member(U,Y) ) ),
    file('Axioms/SET005+0.ax',subclass_defn) ).

cnf(2,plain,
    ( ~ member(sK1(X0,X1),X1)
    | subclass(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[subclass_defn]) ).

cnf(l7,plain,
    ( ~ member(sK1(sK11,sK10),sK10)
    | subclass(sK11,sK10) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

cnf(l2,plain,
    ( ~ member(sK1(sK10,sK11),sK11)
    | subclass(sK10,sK11) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

cnf(91,plain,
    ( ~ member(X0,sK11)
    | member(X0,sK10) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[equality1_negated]) ).

cnf(l8,plain,
    ( ~ member(sK1(sK11,sK10),sK11)
    | member(sK1(sK11,sK10),sK10) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[91]) ).

cnf(1,plain,
    ( subclass(X0,X1)
    | member(sK1(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[subclass_defn]) ).

cnf(l9,plain,
    ( subclass(sK11,sK10)
    | member(sK1(sK11,sK10),sK11) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

cnf(90,plain,
    ( ~ member(X0,sK10)
    | member(X0,sK11) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[equality1_negated]) ).

cnf(l3,plain,
    ( ~ member(sK1(sK10,sK11),sK10)
    | member(sK1(sK10,sK11),sK11) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[90]) ).

cnf(l6,plain,
    ( subclass(sK10,sK11)
    | member(sK1(sK10,sK11),sK10) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

cnf(final,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ground_refutation,[status(thm)],[l0,l1,l7,l2,l8,l9,l3,l6]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SET056+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jul 21 19:36:49 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 2
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 7
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 4
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 1
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 5
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 6
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 3
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 8
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 9
% 0.13/0.38  % launching worker at depth: 10
% 0.13/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.39  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------