↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SET059-7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:46:18 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.28s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.28s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (  14 unt;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   36 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   21 (  12   ~;   9   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   0 sgn   8   !;   0   ?;   4   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subclass(X0,X1)
      | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members2) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X1
      | ~ subclass(X1,X0)
      | ~ subclass(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_implies_equal) ).

fof(f107,negated_conjecture,
    member(not_subclass_element(x,y),y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_equality4_1) ).

fof(f108,negated_conjecture,
    member(not_subclass_element(y,x),x),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_equality4_2) ).

fof(f109,negated_conjecture,
    x != y,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_equality4_3) ).

tcf(c_151,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subclass(X0,X1)
      | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_155,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ subclass(X1,X0)
      | ~ subclass(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_230,negated_conjecture,
    member(not_subclass_element(x,y),y),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f107]) ).

tcf(c_231,negated_conjecture,
    member(not_subclass_element(y,x),x),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f108]) ).

tcf(c_232,negated_conjecture,
    x != y,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f109]) ).

tcf(c_2774,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = not_subclass_element(y,x),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_2775,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = not_subclass_element(x,y),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_2776,negated_conjecture,
    x != y,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_232]) ).

tcf(c_2777,negated_conjecture,
    member(iPr_def_10,x),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_231,c_2774]) ).

tcf(c_2778,negated_conjecture,
    member(iPr_def_11,y),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_230,c_2775]) ).

tcf(c_3638,plain,
    ( subclass(x,y)
    | ~ member(iPr_def_11,y) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2775,c_151]) ).

tcf(c_3639,plain,
    ( subclass(y,x)
    | ~ member(iPr_def_10,x) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2774,c_151]) ).

tcf(c_3640,plain,
    subclass(y,x),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3639,c_2777]) ).

tcf(c_3641,plain,
    subclass(x,y),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3638,c_2778]) ).

tcf(c_3910,plain,
    ( ( x = y )
    | ~ subclass(x,y) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3640,c_155]) ).

tcf(c_3914,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3910,c_2776,c_3641]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET059-7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 09:33:43 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.42  
% 0.11/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.11/0.42  
% 0.11/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.11/0.43  % Proving...
% 2.28/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.28/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.28/1.28  
% 2.28/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.28/1.28  
% 2.28/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.28/1.28  
% 2.28/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.28/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.28/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.28/1.28  
% 2.28/1.28  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 2.28/1.28  
% 2.28/1.28  
% 2.28/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.28/1.28  
% 2.28/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.28/1.28  
% 2.28/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.28/1.28  
% 2.28/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.28/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 2.28/1.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.28/1.28  
% 2.28/1.28  % 
% 2.28/1.28  % clauses                               77
% 2.28/1.28  % conjectures                           3
% 2.28/1.28  % EPR                                   16
% 2.28/1.28  % Horn                                  69
% 2.28/1.28  % unary                                 20
% 2.28/1.28  % binary                                36
% 2.28/1.28  % lits                                  161
% 2.28/1.28  % lits eq                               23
% 2.28/1.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.28/1.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.28/1.28  % fd_cond                               3
% 2.28/1.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        3
% 2.28/1.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.28/1.28  
% 2.28/1.28  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.28/1.28  
% 2.28/1.28  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.28/1.28  
% 2.28/1.28  
% 2.28/1.28  % ------ 
% 2.28/1.28  % Current options:
% 2.28/1.28  % ------ 
% 2.28/1.28  
% 2.28/1.28  
% 2.28/1.28  % 
% 2.28/1.28  
% 2.28/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 2.28/1.28  % 
% 2.28/1.28  
% 2.28/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.28/1.28  
% 2.28/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.28/1.28  
% 2.28/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------