%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SET060+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:08:48 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 6.60s 2.20s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 17 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_50,plain,
( member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1d14hub3/input.p',i_0_50) ).
cnf(i_0_69,negated_conjecture,
member(esk7_0,intersection(complement(esk6_0),esk6_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1d14hub3/input.p',i_0_69) ).
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
( ~ member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1d14hub3/input.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_49,plain,
( member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,intersection(X3,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1d14hub3/input.p',i_0_49) ).
cnf(c_0_74,plain,
( member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
i_0_50 ).
cnf(c_0_75,negated_conjecture,
member(esk7_0,intersection(complement(esk6_0),esk6_0)),
i_0_69 ).
cnf(c_0_76,plain,
( ~ member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_77,negated_conjecture,
member(esk7_0,complement(esk6_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_75]) ).
cnf(c_0_78,plain,
( member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,intersection(X3,X2)) ),
i_0_49 ).
cnf(c_0_79,plain,
~ member(esk7_0,esk6_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_77]) ).
cnf(c_0_80,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_78,c_0_75]),c_0_79]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SET060+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 15:57:39 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.46 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 6.60/2.20 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 6.60/2.20 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 6.60/2.20 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 6.60/2.20
% 6.60/2.20 # Proof found!
% 6.60/2.20 # SZS status Theorem
% 6.60/2.20 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.60/2.20 # Proof object total steps : 11
% 6.60/2.20 # Proof object clause steps : 7
% 6.60/2.20 # Proof object formula steps : 4
% 6.60/2.20 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 6.60/2.20 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 6.60/2.20 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 6.60/2.20 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 6.60/2.20 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 6.60/2.20 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 6.60/2.20 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 6.60/2.20 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.60/2.20 # Parsed axioms : 82
% 6.60/2.20 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 6.60/2.20 # Initial clauses : 82
% 6.60/2.20 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 6.60/2.20 # Initial clauses in saturation : 82
% 6.60/2.20 # Processed clauses : 86
% 6.60/2.20 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 6.60/2.20 # ...subsumed : 0
% 6.60/2.20 # ...remaining for further processing : 85
% 6.60/2.20 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5
% 6.60/2.20 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 6.60/2.20 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 6.60/2.20 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 6.60/2.20 # Generated clauses : 207
% 6.60/2.20 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 190
% 6.60/2.20 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 6.60/2.20 # Paramodulations : 200
% 6.60/2.20 # Factorizations : 0
% 6.60/2.20 # Equation resolutions : 7
% 6.60/2.20 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 6.60/2.20 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 6.60/2.20 # Current number of processed clauses : 81
% 6.60/2.20 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 13
% 6.60/2.20 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 6.60/2.20 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 6.60/2.20 # Non-unit-clauses : 66
% 6.60/2.20 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 186
% 6.60/2.20 # ...number of literals in the above : 498
% 6.60/2.20 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 6.60/2.20 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 6.60/2.20 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 887
% 6.60/2.20 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 822
% 6.60/2.20 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 6.60/2.20 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 66
% 6.60/2.20 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 6.60/2.20 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 6.60/2.20 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 6.60/2.20 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 6.60/2.20 # Condensation successes : 0
% 6.60/2.20 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7115
% 6.60/2.20
% 6.60/2.20 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.60/2.20 # User time : 0.015 s
% 6.60/2.20 # System time : 0.002 s
% 6.60/2.20 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 6.60/2.20 # ...preprocessing : 0.013 s
% 6.60/2.20 # ...main loop : 0.004 s
% 6.60/2.20 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 6.60/2.20
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------