↑ Up

hopCoP---0.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : hopCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SET061+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 25 03:31:20 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.34s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    8 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    6 (   6   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   1 sgn   3   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(existence_of_null_class,plain,
    ? [X] :
    ! [Z] : ~ member(Z,X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_of_null_class) ).

fof(existence_of_null_class_negated,plain,
    ~ ? [X] :
      ! [Z] : ~ member(Z,X),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[existence_of_null_class]) ).

cnf(89,plain,
    member(sK10(X0),X0),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[existence_of_null_class_negated]) ).

cnf(l0,plain,
    member(sK10(null_class),null_class),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[89]) ).

fof(null_class_defn,plain,
    ! [X] : ~ member(X,null_class),
    file('Axioms/SET005+0.ax',null_class_defn) ).

cnf(31,plain,
    ~ member(X0,null_class),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[null_class_defn]) ).

cnf(l1,plain,
    ~ member(sK10(null_class),null_class),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[31]) ).

cnf(final,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ground_refutation,[status(thm)],[l0,l1]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SET061+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jul 21 19:37:49 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 3
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 1
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 4
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 5
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 2
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 6
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 7
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 8
% 0.13/0.34  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.34  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------