%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SET062+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:46:19 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 3.06s 1.27s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.06s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 40 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 40 ( 19 ~; 12 |; 6 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 0 sgn 25 !; 3 ?; 4 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( subclass(X0,X1)
<=> ! [X2] :
( member(X2,X0)
=> member(X2,X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',subclass_defn) ).
fof(f16,axiom,
! [X0] : ~ member(X0,null_class),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',null_class_defn) ).
fof(f44,conjecture,
! [X0] : subclass(null_class,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',null_class_is_subclass) ).
fof(f45,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0] : subclass(null_class,X0),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f44]) ).
fof(f47,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( subclass(X0,X1)
<=> ! [X2] :
( ~ member(X2,X0)
| member(X2,X1) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f60,plain,
? [X0] : ~ subclass(null_class,X0),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f45]) ).
fof(f61,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ~ subclass(X0,X1)
| ! [X2] :
( ~ member(X2,X0)
| member(X2,X1) ) )
& ( ? [X2] :
( member(X2,X0)
& ~ member(X2,X1) )
| subclass(X0,X1) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f47]) ).
fof(f62,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ~ subclass(X0,X1)
| ! [X3] :
( ~ member(X3,X0)
| member(X3,X1) ) )
& ( ? [X2] :
( member(X2,X0)
& ~ member(X2,X1) )
| subclass(X0,X1) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f61]) ).
fof(f63,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ~ subclass(X0,X1)
| ! [X3] :
( ~ member(X3,X0)
| member(X3,X1) ) )
& ( ( member(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
& ~ member(sK0(X0,X1),X1) )
| subclass(X0,X1) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X2,sK0(X0,X1))],[f62]) ).
fof(f103,plain,
~ subclass(null_class,sK6),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK6]),skolemize(X0,sK6)],[f60]) ).
fof(f105,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( member(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
| subclass(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f63]) ).
fof(f135,plain,
! [X0] : ~ member(X0,null_class),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).
fof(f191,plain,
~ subclass(null_class,sK6),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f103]) ).
tcf(c_50,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( subclass(X0,X1)
| member(sK0(X0,X1),X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f105]) ).
tcf(c_77,plain,
! [X0: $i] : ~ member(X0,null_class),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f135]) ).
tcf(c_128,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(null_class,sK6),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f191]) ).
tcf(c_1552,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(null_class,sK6),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_128]) ).
tcf(c_2356,plain,
! [X0: $i] : subclass(null_class,X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_77]) ).
tcf(c_2357,plain,
$false,
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1552,c_2356]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SET062+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 09:35:24 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.36 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.41
% 0.10/0.41 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.41
% 0.10/0.41 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.42 % Proving...
% 3.06/1.27 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.06/1.27 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.06/1.27
% 3.06/1.27 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.06/1.27
% 3.06/1.27 % ------ iProver source info
% 3.06/1.27
% 3.06/1.27 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.06/1.27 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.06/1.27 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.06/1.27
% 3.06/1.27 % ------ Parsing...
% 3.06/1.27 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 3.06/1.27
% 3.06/1.27 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 4 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 3.06/1.27
% 3.06/1.27 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 3.06/1.27
% 3.06/1.27 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.06/1.27 % ------ Proving...
% 3.06/1.27 % ------ Problem Properties
% 3.06/1.27
% 3.06/1.27 %
% 3.06/1.27 % clauses 75
% 3.06/1.27 % conjectures 1
% 3.06/1.27 % EPR 8
% 3.06/1.27 % Horn 67
% 3.06/1.27 % unary 15
% 3.06/1.27 % binary 39
% 3.06/1.27 % lits 157
% 3.06/1.27 % lits eq 14
% 3.06/1.27 % fd_pure 0
% 3.06/1.27 % fd_pseudo 0
% 3.06/1.27 % fd_cond 4
% 3.06/1.27 % fd_pseudo_cond 3
% 3.06/1.27 % AC symbols 0
% 3.06/1.27
% 3.06/1.27 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 3.06/1.27
% 3.06/1.27 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.06/1.27
% 3.06/1.27
% 3.06/1.27 % ------
% 3.06/1.27 % Current options:
% 3.06/1.27 % ------
% 3.06/1.27
% 3.06/1.27
% 3.06/1.27 %
% 3.06/1.27
% 3.06/1.27 % ------ Proving...
% 3.06/1.27 %
% 3.06/1.27
% 3.06/1.27 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.06/1.27
% 3.06/1.27 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.06/1.27
% 3.06/1.27
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------