↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET062+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:35:33 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.07s 0.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   33 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   34 (  15   ~;  11   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   1 sgn  19   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(empty_set_defn,axiom,
    ! [B] : ~ member(B,empty_set),
    file('theBenchmark.p',empty_set_defn) ).

fof(subset_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( subset(B,C)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( member(D,B)
         => member(D,C) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).

fof(prove_empty_set_subset,conjecture,
    ! [B] : subset(empty_set,B),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_empty_set_subset) ).

fof(prove_empty_set_subset_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B] : subset(empty_set,B),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_empty_set_subset]) ).

fof(nnf_2,plain,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( ( ? [D] :
            ( ~ member(D,C)
            & member(D,B) )
        | subset(B,C) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( member(X0,C)
            | ~ member(X0,B) )
        | ~ subset(B,C) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset_defn]) ).

fof(sk_subset_defn_sk,plain,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( ( ( ~ member(sK0(B,C),C)
          & member(sK0(B,C),B) )
        | subset(B,C) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( member(X0,C)
            | ~ member(X0,B) )
        | ~ subset(B,C) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(D,sK0(B,C))],[nnf_2]) ).

fof(sk_subset_defn,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ member(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1)
        | subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( member(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_0)
        | subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( member(VAR_2,VAR_1)
        | ~ member(VAR_2,VAR_0)
        | ~ subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_subset_defn_sk]) ).

cnf(c_6,plain,
    ( member(sK0(A,B),A)
    | subset(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_subset_defn]) ).

fof(nnf_5,plain,
    ? [B] : ~ subset(empty_set,B),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[prove_empty_set_subset_neg]) ).

fof(sk_prove_empty_set_subset_neg,plain,
    ~ subset(empty_set,sK1),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(B,sK1)],[nnf_5]) ).

cnf(c_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(empty_set,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_empty_set_subset_neg]) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    ~ member(A,empty_set),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[empty_set_defn]) ).

cnf(c_18,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK0(empty_set,sK1),empty_set),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_6]) ).

cnf(c_19,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_18]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET062+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 07:01:04 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.35  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.07/0.35  % Process 2446008 was started by sandbox2 on n014,
% 0.07/0.35  % Sat Sep 26 07:01:04 2026
% 0.07/0.35  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.07/0.36  
% 0.07/0.36  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.07/0.37  
% 0.07/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.07/0.37  
% 0.07/0.37  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.07/0.37  % Length of proof is 8.
% 0.07/0.37  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.07/0.37  % Maximum clause weight is 3.000.
% 0.07/0.37  % Given clauses 0.
% 0.07/0.37  
% 0.07/0.37  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------