↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET063+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:35:34 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.08s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   24 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   19 (   9   ~;   4   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   1 sgn   5   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(empty_set_subset,axiom,
    ! [B] : subset(empty_set,B),
    file('theBenchmark.p',empty_set_subset) ).

fof(equal_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( B = C
    <=> ( subset(C,B)
        & subset(B,C) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',equal_defn) ).

fof(prove_subset_of_empty_set_is_empty_set,conjecture,
    ! [B] :
      ( subset(B,empty_set)
     => B = empty_set ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_subset_of_empty_set_is_empty_set) ).

fof(prove_subset_of_empty_set_is_empty_set_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B] :
        ( subset(B,empty_set)
       => B = empty_set ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_subset_of_empty_set_is_empty_set]) ).

fof(nnf_7,plain,
    ? [B] :
      ( B != empty_set
      & subset(B,empty_set) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[prove_subset_of_empty_set_is_empty_set_neg]) ).

fof(sk_prove_subset_of_empty_set_is_empty_set_neg,plain,
    ( sK0 != empty_set
    & subset(sK0,empty_set) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(B,sK0)],[nnf_7]) ).

cnf(c_11,negated_conjecture,
    sK0 != empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_subset_of_empty_set_is_empty_set_neg]) ).

cnf(c_12,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK0,empty_set),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_subset_of_empty_set_is_empty_set_neg]) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    ( ~ subset(A,B)
    | ~ subset(B,A)
    | A = B ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[equal_defn]) ).

cnf(c_21,plain,
    subset(empty_set,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[empty_set_subset]) ).

cnf(c_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(empty_set,sK0)
    | empty_set = sK0 ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_12]) ).

cnf(c_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(empty_set,sK0)
    | sK0 = empty_set ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_23]) ).

cnf(c_25,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(empty_set,sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_11,c_24]) ).

cnf(c_22,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_21,c_25]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET063+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 06:56:19 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.08/0.36  % Process 88011 was started by sandbox on n017,
% 0.08/0.36  % Sat Sep 26 06:56:19 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.08/0.37  
% 0.08/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.08/0.38  
% 0.08/0.38  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.08/0.38  
% 0.08/0.38  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.08/0.38  % Length of proof is 8.
% 0.08/0.38  % Level of proof is 2.
% 0.08/0.38  % Maximum clause weight is 9.000.
% 0.08/0.38  % Given clauses 5.
% 0.08/0.38  
% 0.08/0.38  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------