↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SET063+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:46:20 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.59s 11.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   41 (  15 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   38 (  17   ~;  11   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn  15   !;   1   ?;   3   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0] : subset(empty_set,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',empty_set_subset) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X1
    <=> ( subset(X1,X0)
        & subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equal_defn) ).

fof(f7,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( subset(X0,empty_set)
     => X0 = empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_subset_of_empty_set_is_empty_set) ).

fof(f8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( subset(X0,empty_set)
       => X0 = empty_set ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f7]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( subset(X0,empty_set)
      & empty_set != X0 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( X0 != X1
        | ( subset(X1,X0)
          & subset(X0,X1) ) )
      & ( ~ subset(X1,X0)
        | ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( X0 != X1
        | ( subset(X1,X0)
          & subset(X0,X1) ) )
      & ( ~ subset(X1,X0)
        | ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ( subset(sK1,empty_set)
    & empty_set != sK1 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK1)],[f10]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ! [X0] : subset(empty_set,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(X1,X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | X0 = X1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    subset(sK1,empty_set),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    empty_set != sK1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : subset(empty_set,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ subset(X1,X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

tcf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
    empty_set != sK1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

tcf(c_59,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK1,empty_set),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

tcf(c_169,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK1,empty_set),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_59]) ).

tcf(c_170,negated_conjecture,
    empty_set != sK1,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_58]) ).

tcf(c_314,plain,
    ( ( empty_set = sK1 )
    | ~ subset(empty_set,sK1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_169,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_315,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_314,c_170,c_49]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET063+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/10.37  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.10/10.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/10.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/10.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/10.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/10.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/10.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/10.37  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 09:32:29 UTC 2026
% 0.10/10.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/10.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/10.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/10.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/10.43  
% 0.13/10.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/10.43  
% 0.13/10.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/10.44  % Proving...
% 1.59/11.29  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.59/11.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.59/11.29  
% 1.59/11.29  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.59/11.29  
% 1.59/11.29  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.59/11.29  
% 1.59/11.29  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.59/11.29  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.59/11.29  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.59/11.29  
% 1.59/11.29  % ------ Parsing...
% 1.59/11.29  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.59/11.29  
% 1.59/11.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.59/11.29  
% 1.59/11.29  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 1.59/11.29  
% 1.59/11.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.59/11.29  % ------ Proving...
% 1.59/11.29  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.59/11.29  
% 1.59/11.29  % 
% 1.59/11.29  % clauses                               9
% 1.59/11.29  % conjectures                           2
% 1.59/11.29  % EPR                                   7
% 1.59/11.29  % Horn                                  8
% 1.59/11.29  % unary                                 5
% 1.59/11.29  % binary                                2
% 1.59/11.29  % lits                                  15
% 1.59/11.29  % lits eq                               2
% 1.59/11.29  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.59/11.29  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.59/11.29  % fd_cond                               0
% 1.59/11.29  % fd_pseudo_cond                        1
% 1.59/11.29  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.59/11.29  
% 1.59/11.29  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.59/11.29  
% 1.59/11.29  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.59/11.29  
% 1.59/11.29  
% 1.59/11.29  % ------ 
% 1.59/11.29  % Current options:
% 1.59/11.29  % ------ 
% 1.59/11.29  
% 1.59/11.29  
% 1.59/11.29  % 
% 1.59/11.29  
% 1.59/11.29  % ------ Proving...
% 1.59/11.29  % 
% 1.59/11.29  
% 1.59/11.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.59/11.29  
% 1.59/11.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.59/11.29  
% 1.59/11.29  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------